Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Broader View on Bias in Automated Decision-Making: Reflecting on Epistemology and Dynamics (1807.00553v2)

Published 2 Jul 2018 in cs.LG, cs.AI, cs.SY, math.DS, and stat.ML

Abstract: Machine learning (ML) is increasingly deployed in real world contexts, supplying actionable insights and forming the basis of automated decision-making systems. While issues resulting from biases pre-existing in training data have been at the center of the fairness debate, these systems are also affected by technical and emergent biases, which often arise as context-specific artifacts of implementation. This position paper interprets technical bias as an epistemological problem and emergent bias as a dynamical feedback phenomenon. In order to stimulate debate on how to change machine learning practice to effectively address these issues, we explore this broader view on bias, stress the need to reflect on epistemology, and point to value-sensitive design methodologies to revisit the design and implementation process of automated decision-making systems.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Roel Dobbe (19 papers)
  2. Sarah Dean (37 papers)
  3. Thomas Gilbert (30 papers)
  4. Nitin Kohli (8 papers)
Citations (37)