Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

FaceForensics: A Large-scale Video Dataset for Forgery Detection in Human Faces (1803.09179v1)

Published 24 Mar 2018 in cs.CV

Abstract: With recent advances in computer vision and graphics, it is now possible to generate videos with extremely realistic synthetic faces, even in real time. Countless applications are possible, some of which raise a legitimate alarm, calling for reliable detectors of fake videos. In fact, distinguishing between original and manipulated video can be a challenge for humans and computers alike, especially when the videos are compressed or have low resolution, as it often happens on social networks. Research on the detection of face manipulations has been seriously hampered by the lack of adequate datasets. To this end, we introduce a novel face manipulation dataset of about half a million edited images (from over 1000 videos). The manipulations have been generated with a state-of-the-art face editing approach. It exceeds all existing video manipulation datasets by at least an order of magnitude. Using our new dataset, we introduce benchmarks for classical image forensic tasks, including classification and segmentation, considering videos compressed at various quality levels. In addition, we introduce a benchmark evaluation for creating indistinguishable forgeries with known ground truth; for instance with generative refinement models.

An Academic Overview of "FaceForensics: A Large-scale Video Dataset for Forgery Detection in Human Faces"

The presented paper, "FaceForensics: A Large-scale Video Dataset for Forgery Detection in Human Faces," introduces an extensive and novel dataset aimed at advancing research in the domain of digital forensics, particularly focusing on the detection of manipulated facial videos. Given the rapid advancements in facial video manipulation technologies, this research addresses the pressing need for sophisticated methods to detect such forgeries, which often elude human perception, especially after video compression common in social media platforms.

Key Contributions and Methodologies

The primary contribution of this paper is the creation of a comprehensive dataset composed of over 500,000 manipulated images from 1004 unique videos. The dataset is unprecedented in its size and the fidelity of manipulation it presents, exceeding existing datasets by an order of magnitude. The manipulations have been generated using the state-of-the-art Face2Face approach, allowing for both source-to-target reenactment and self-reenactment within the dataset.

The paper focuses on several classical image forensics tasks facilitated by this dataset:

  1. Forgery Classification and Segmentation: The paper benchmarks various state-of-the-art methods for identifying whether images have been forged and pinpointing exact manipulated regions within an image. These tasks are particularly challenging when dealing with compressed data, where manipulation artifacts are prone to being masked.
  2. Forged Image Refinement: The dataset has been utilized to evaluate the potential of generative models, particularly in enhancing the plausibility of synthetic images, with a focus on refining facial forgeries to make detection more challenging.

Numerical Results and Observations

The paper evaluates several state-of-the-art models, including CNN architectures optimized for image forensics. Notably, the fully developed dataset provides a robust platform for assessing these models in a realistic Internet-scenario setting (with varying levels of video compression). The XceptionNet and models proposed by Zhou et al. display high accuracy in classifying manipulations, even under compression conditions. The classification tasks show resilience to compression artifacts, whereas segmentation tasks have shown significant degradation under high compression—demonstrating the challenges in pixel-level detection.

Furthermore, a novel application of the dataset is the refinement of fake images using an autoencoder designed to enhance facial forgery realism. Interestingly, while the autoencoder refinement enhances visual quality for subjective human judgment, advanced classifiers still detect these refinements with notable accuracy.

Implications and Speculations

The implications of this research extend far beyond the development of deepfake detection systems. The availability of such a large and detailed dataset could incentivize future research into both the detection and generation realms of synthetic media, facilitating the development of more robust image and video forensics tools. The dataset’s capability to train algorithms on heavily compressed data opens new avenues for deploying detection systems in environments where resource optimization is critical, such as mobile and edge computing devices.

In terms of future developments, the paper suggests further exploration into generative adversarial networks (GANs) that can produce more deceptive refinements, posing a novel challenge to current forgery detection frameworks. Additionally, the balance between creating sophisticated forgeries and building detection systems that can generalize across different manipulation techniques will inevitably drive significant advancements in digital media reliability and security.

Conclusion

In summation, "FaceForensics: A Large-scale Video Dataset for Forgery Detection in Human Faces" provides an invaluable resource to the research community tasked with the ongoing challenge of face forgery detection. By quantitatively and qualitatively evaluating current detection and refinement methodologies, this paper sets a strong foundation for future explorations. The insights drawn from this work highlight the dual nature of technological advancement, where improvements in synthesis prompt parallel advancements in detection, ensuring the integrity and authenticity of digital media.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Andreas Rössler (10 papers)
  2. Davide Cozzolino (36 papers)
  3. Luisa Verdoliva (51 papers)
  4. Christian Riess (36 papers)
  5. Justus Thies (62 papers)
  6. Matthias Nießner (177 papers)
Citations (354)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com