Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 77 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 75 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 220 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

New physical insights about Tidal Disruption Events from a comprehensive observational inventory at X-ray wavelengths (1611.02291v2)

Published 7 Nov 2016 in astro-ph.HE

Abstract: We perform a comprehensive study of the X-ray emission from 70 transient sources which have been classified as a tidal disruption event (TDE) in the literature. We explore the properties of these candidates using nearly three decades of X-ray observations to quantify the properties and characteristics of X-ray TDEs observationally. We find that the emission from X-ray TDEs increase by two to four orders of magnitude compared to pre-flare constraints, which evolves significantly with time and decays with powerlaw indices that are typically shallower than the canonical $t{-5/3}$ decay law, implying that X-ray TDEs are viscously delayed. These events exhibit enhanced column densities relative to Galactic and are quite soft in nature, with no strong correlation between the amount of detected soft and hard emission. At peak, jetted events have an X-ray to optical ratio $\gg$1, while non-jetted events have a ratio $\sim$1, which suggests that these events undergo reprocessing at different rates. X-ray TDEs have long $T_{90}$ values consistent with that expected from a viscously-driven accretion disk formed by the disruption of a main-sequence star by a black hole with a mass $<$$10{7}M_{\odot}$. The isotropic luminosities of X-ray TDEs is bimodal such that jetted and non-jetted events are separated by a "reprocessing valley" which we suggest is naturally populated by optical/UV TDEs that most likely produce X-rays, but due to reprocessing this emission is "veiled" from observations. Our results suggest that non-jetted X-ray TDEs likely originate from partial disruptions and/or disruptions of low mass stars.

Citations (186)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube