Spectral PINNSformer (S-Pformer)

• The S-Pformer is a neural architecture that integrates Fourier feature embeddings and attention mechanisms to represent and solve PDEs efficiently.
• It mitigates spectral bias by explicitly modeling high-frequency components, leading to exponential convergence and reduced computational costs.
• Empirical results show significant accuracy gains and memory savings, making S-Pformers effective for complex, multi-scale PDE problems.

The Spectral PINNSformer (S-Pformer) is a class of neural architectures and algorithmic frameworks for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) using deep learning, with a focus on explicit handling of spectral properties, mitigation of spectral bias, and enhanced convergence of high-frequency components. S-Pformer models integrate architectural innovations such as Fourier feature embeddings, attention-based mechanisms, frequency-adaptive initializations, and training in the spectral domain. These models address persistent limitations of conventional Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs)—notably slow convergence of high-frequency modes and high computational cost for complex PDEs—by leveraging domain knowledge from spectral analysis and signal processing.

1. Spectral Bias in Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Spectral bias is the empirically and theoretically established phenomenon by which neural networks, including PINNs, preferentially and more rapidly learn low-frequency (smooth) components of the target function over high-frequency (oscillatory) ones. Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) theory demonstrates that for fully coupled ANNs trained with mean square error loss and small learning rates, error along the $i$th NTK eigen-direction decays as $e^{-\lambda_i t}$, where $\lambda_i$ increases for lower-frequency modes. This bias persists in PINNs, which, while minimizing PDE residuals rather than pointwise error, still exhibit slow convergence of solutions' high-frequency spectral components (Deshpande et al., 2023, Seroussi et al., 2023).

Numerical experiments on multi- and single-frequency sinusoids confirm that low-frequency solution content is resolved with orders-of-magnitude fewer iterations than high-frequency features. Crucially, once the coefficients of the differential operators are normalized to remove trivial scaling (e.g., damping terms like $1/k^2$), spectral bias becomes more pronounced, particularly for higher-order PDEs—e.g., the iteration ratio between fastest (low) and slowest (high) frequency convergence increases with equation order. Thus, PINNs' limitations in resolving high-frequency and multi-scale phenomena can be attributed to this intrinsic bias.

2. Spectral PINNSformer Architectures and Frequency-Aware Mechanisms

To address spectral bias, S-Pformers incorporate explicit spectral-domain representations and operations into the network design. These strategies include:

• Fourier Feature Embeddings: Inputs $v \in \mathbb{R}^d$ are mapped to $[ \cos(2\pi B v),\ \sin(2\pi B v) ]$ for a frequency matrix $B$ sampled from Gaussian, Laplace, or uniform distributions (Ding et al., 5 Sep 2024, Arni et al., 6 Oct 2025). This embedding lifts spatial and temporal inputs into a basis suited to representing high-frequency content, promoting more uniform learning across the spectrum.
• Attention-Driven Decoders: S-Pformer architectures replace standard MLPs or encoder-decoder attention modules with a streamlined, decoder-only transformer design that emphasizes multi-head self-attention (Arni et al., 6 Oct 2025), often combined with frequency-adaptive activations (e.g., a parameterized Wavelet activation: $\omega_1 \sin(x) + \omega_2 \cos(x)$) (Zhao et al., 2023). Positional encodings are layered with Fourier embeddings to preserve local dependencies while capturing multiscale behavior.
• Spectral/Physical Feature Calibration: Mechanisms such as point-calibrated spectral mixing (modulating classical spectral basis functions—Fourier or Laplace-Beltrami eigenfunctions—by pointwise-learned gates) allow the network to adapt basis functions locally, effectively combining the domain-wide smoothness of spectral operators with the locality of attention (Yue et al., 15 Oct 2024).
• Spectral Plane-Wave Layers: In some variants, plane-wave or Fourier decomposition is built directly into the network as an activation or transformation layer, e.g., $\sigma(z, t, \omega) = z\,e^{i\omega t}$, yielding networks optimized for oscillatory and wave-type PDEs (Clements et al., 31 Mar 2025).

The table below compiles architectural components commonly encountered in S-Pformer literature:

Spectral Component	Description	Cited Papers
Fourier Feature Embedding	Map coordinates to periodic basis via $Bv$	(Ding et al., 5 Sep 2024Arni et al., 6 Oct 2025)
Wavelet/Spectral Activation	Adaptive sine/cosine-based nonlinear functions	(Zhao et al., 2023Clements et al., 31 Mar 2025)
Attention-Driven Decoder	Multi-head self-attention without encoder	(Arni et al., 6 Oct 2025)
Point-Calibrated Spectral Mix	Local gating of spectral basis	(Yue et al., 15 Oct 2024)

3. PINNs Training in the Spectral Domain

A substantial computational bottleneck in classical PINNs is the cost of computing high-order derivatives via automatic differentiation, especially for deep or high-dimensional models. S-Pformer approaches mitigate this by operating directly in the spectral (Fourier) domain, reformulating differential operators as frequency multiplications (e.g., $\partial_x u \to i k \tilde u$) (Yu et al., 29 Aug 2024). This spectral reformulation leads to:

• Memory and speed advantages: The memory footprint for computing derivatives scales with the function representation (number of modes) but not derivative order; in contrast, PINNs' memory usage increases exponentially with derivative order due to repeated AD calls.
• Exponential convergence: For smooth (analytic) solutions, spectral approximations converge exponentially, with error rates $o(N^{-s})$ for all $s>0$ as the number of spectral modes $N$ increases, surpassing the $O(N^{-1/2})$ Monte Carlo error typical of PINNs.
• Spectral weighting strategies: Emphasis can be placed on important spectral modes using sampling-by-importance (SI) probability densities $p(k)$ or by weighting loss terms according to spectral shell importance, compensating for the energy distribution across frequencies (Yu et al., 29 Aug 2024).

4. Spectral Bias Mitigation: Algorithms and Theoretical Analysis

Multiple S-Pformer variants employ explicit spectral bias mitigation strategies:

• Spectral Initialization and Multistage Learning: Dominant Spectral Pattern (DSP) extraction (via discrete Fourier transform of PINN residuals) identifies modes with maximum error contribution. These dominant frequencies, amplitudes, and phases are then used to initialize subsequent network stages, guiding learning toward difficult residual components. Spectrum-weighted Random Fourier Feature (RFF) embeddings bias initial layers toward modes with highest power spectral density (Li et al., 25 Aug 2025).
• Spectral Decomposition of PDE Residuals: The source term $\phi$ of a PDE can be decomposed onto the eigenfunctions of the composite operator $L \hat K L^\dagger$, where $K$ is the GP kernel encoding network architecture and $L$ the PDE operator (Seroussi et al., 2023). This analysis allows quantifying which spectral modes are "matched" or favored by the current network instantiation.
• Task–Kernel Alignment Metrics: The "kernel–task alignment" is quantified through figures of merit such as $Q_n[\phi, g]$ and spectral cumulative functions. These measures inform architectural or hyperparameter selection to maximize the overlap of easy-to-learn modes with high-energy components of the solution (Seroussi et al., 2023).

5. Empirical Validation and Performance Benchmarks

S-Pformer architectures consistently demonstrate substantial improvements over standard PINNs in terms of convergence speed, memory efficiency, and solution fidelity for PDEs with rich spectral content:

• Accuracy Gains: Across convection, reaction, wave, and high-dimensional Navier–Stokes benchmarks, S-Pformers achieve lower relative mean absolute errors and root mean squared errors. For instance, the S-Pformer achieves an $r$MAE of $1.15 \times 10^{-3}$ on 1D-reaction equations, with error reductions in high-frequency bands of up to 30% compared to classical decoder-only baselines (Arni et al., 6 Oct 2025). Spectral approaches (e.g., SINN) further reduce training loss to the level of $10^{-7}$ on the Burgers equation (Li et al., 25 Aug 2025).
• Computational Savings: Memory scaling is independent of derivative order in spectral-domain S-Pformers, enabling efficient resolution of high-order PDEs infeasible for classical PINNs. Training times are also shortened (e.g., SINN achieves solutions up to twice as fast as PINNs for equivalent accuracy (Yu et al., 29 Aug 2024)).
• Generalization and Zero-Shot Transfer: The use of static or locally-adaptive spectral bases provides resolution-invariant representations, supporting zero-shot generalization to unseen spatial discretizations or boundary conditions. S-Pformers trained on a randomized set of boundary conditions generalize to out-of-distribution inputs with robust accuracy (Clements et al., 31 Mar 2025), while point-calibrated spectral models show consistent error reduction across variable mesh resolutions (Yue et al., 15 Oct 2024).

6. Extensions, Applications, and Future Directions

The Spectral PINNSformer framework is actively applied in domains requiring high-fidelity resolution of multi-scale and oscillatory PDE solutions, including:

• Seismic wave simulation in complex, nonsmooth media: S-Pformers with Fourier feature embeddings yield accurate modeling of high-frequency wave propagation with absorbing boundary constraints, enabling realistic forward modeling and inversion tasks in geophysics (Ding et al., 5 Sep 2024).
• Structural Health Monitoring (SHM): PINNs equipped with plane-wave decomposition and randomized boundary condition training serve as efficient, generalizable engines for predicting system responses under arbitrary excitations, minimizing retraining requirements (Clements et al., 31 Mar 2025).
• Computational fluid dynamics, electromagnetics, and beyond: Multistage S-Pformers with dominant spectral pattern initialization efficiently resolve Burgers and Helmholtz equations and are indicated for broader adoption in physical sciences and engineering (Li et al., 25 Aug 2025).

Potential research avenues include adaptive or learnable frequency selection for Fourier embeddings, hybridization of transformer and MLP architectures, incorporation of wavelet or alternative nonstationary spectral bases, and utilization of quantum spectral algorithms for high-dimensional problems (Arni et al., 6 Oct 2025, Li et al., 25 Aug 2025). The integration of spectral priors with local adaptivity and efficient attention continues to be a central theme in next-generation operator learning for PDEs.

7. Comparisons and Synthesis with Alternative Architectures

The S-Pformer paradigm stands at the intersection of spectral (global, resolution-invariant) and attention-based (local, adaptive) methods. For example, the Holistic Physics Mixer (HPM) integrates calibrated spectral transforms with multi-head attention, enabling flexible adaptation of classical basis functions via learned gating (Yue et al., 15 Oct 2024). Such architectures inherit the strong generalization and data efficiency of spectral methods while matching the adaptability of attention networks—demonstrating lower Relative L2 errors and robust zero-shot transfer across complex domains.

In contrast to classical PINNs (MLP-based) or fixed-encoder-decoder transformers, S-Pformer models deliver superior spectral convergence, reduced parameter overhead, and systematic control over spectral bias. This evidences a shift toward model specialization grounded in prior knowledge of the governing physics, spectrum, and solution structure, rather than homogeneous black-box approximation.

---