Representation Vectors: Methods & Applications

Updated 19 February 2026

Representation vectors are mathematical objects that map entities to fixed-dimensional spaces, preserving semantic and structural information.
They are constructed using methods such as dense neural embeddings, sparse hand-crafted features, and order-based techniques to ensure both faithfulness and expressiveness.
These vectors underpin key applications in language modeling, image retrieval, and hierarchical encoding, driving advances in deep learning and computational reasoning.

A representation vector is a mathematical object—usually an element of ℝᵈ or {0,1}ᵈ—that encodes the semantic, structural, or relational information of an entity, event, or structure in a manner suitable for computation, storage, and downstream learning. In contemporary machine learning and theoretical computer science, the paradigm of transforming objects (such as words, images, sets, classes, or process traces) into suitable vectors underpins nearly all forms of automated reasoning, classification, and retrieval.

1. Core Definitions and Theoretical Foundations

Representation vectors formalize the notion of mapping structured or unstructured objects into a (typically fixed-dimensional) vector space. The vector may be dense (ℝᵈ, ℂᵈ), sparse ({0,1}ᵈ, with only a few nonzero coordinates), or even drawn from non-Euclidean spaces (hyperbolic, box, or order embeddings).

Two fundamental requirements are generally imposed:

Faithfulness: The mapping preserves semantic or structural equivalence; semantically close or equivalent objects should map to nearby vectors, and crucial relations—such as permutation invariance (for sets), order (for hierarchies), or compositionality (for logic or language)—should be realized as simple operations (e.g., addition, binding, or elementwise comparison) in vector space.
Expressiveness: The representation is sufficiently rich to encode all necessary distinctions for the task, up to universality in some cases (the ability to approximate any target function to arbitrary accuracy using the space of representations).

A canonical instance is the sum-decomposable form for permutation-invariant set functions, which asserts that any multiset function f(X) can be written as

$f(X) = \rho\left(\sum_{x\in X} \phi(x)\right)$

with suitable encoders φ and decoders ρ (Tabaghi et al., 2023).

For hierarchical structures and partial orders, representation vectors may be further constrained, for example, by requiring that a binary vector b encodes a concept such that $b_a \wedge b_b = b_b$ if and only if $a$ is-a $b$ in the hierarchy (Gyurek et al., 2024).

2. Major Methodological Classes

Representation vectors span a wide methodological spectrum:

(a) Distributional and Neural Embeddings

Data-driven, continuous embeddings (e.g., word2vec, BERT, doc2vec) are trained to position similar entities close together in ℝᵈ via gradient optimization on objective functions derived from word co-occurrence, next-token prediction, or masked-language modeling (Grzegorczyk, 2019, Yunus et al., 2022).

(b) Non-Distributional or Hand-Crafted Sparse Embeddings

Vectors constructed by assigning a dimension to each interpretable linguistic or symbolic property: for word representations, each bit in a high-dimensional, sparse binary vector signals the presence or absence of a linguistic feature, e.g., dictionary sense, sentiment, part-of-speech, color association. This offers fully interpretable, hand-engineered representations (Faruqui et al., 2015).

(c) Structure-Preserving and Order-Based Embeddings

To encode hierarchies or partial orders, vectors are subjected to geometric constraints: order embeddings in ℝ⁺ᵈ, hyperbolic embeddings, Boolean vector order-embeddings (e.g., Binder), and region-based embeddings (boxes). Each approach enforces that relations such as $a$ is-a $b$ correspond to inclusion, order, or implication in vector space, with trade-offs in expressiveness, optimization complexity, and parameter efficiency (Gyurek et al., 2024).

(d) Aggregation, Summation, and Decomposition

When representing collections, classes, or sets, vectors are typically aggregated by addition, averaging, or more general sum-decomposable functions. The theoretical underpinnings of universal approximation for permutation-invariant functions show that, for discrete or continuous element spaces, linear summation or more advanced polynomial features over the set can encode any desired function, though with rapidly increasing latent dimension in general (Tabaghi et al., 2023).

(e) Concept and Bias Vectors in Deep Models

Deep representation engineering surfaces abstraction-aligned directions (concept vectors) in activation space: extracting such a vector (e.g., gender, sentiment, refusal) entails forming a supervised or self-supervised linear combination over hidden states, typically by a weighted average across examples with known concept magnitude. This vector can be used both diagnostically (for measurement) and algorithmically (for intervention/steering) (Cyberey et al., 27 Feb 2025, Cyberey et al., 23 Apr 2025).

3. Representation Vector Construction: Universal, Class-Based, and Structured Methods

Universal Representation of sets, multisets, and tensors

The Deep Sets paradigm asserts that the sum of element embeddings suffices for all continuous permutation-invariant functions on finite sets, with improved lower bounds for identifiably labeled elements (latent dimension 2dN suffices for N-element multisets of d-dimensional vectors) (Tabaghi et al., 2023).

Class or Ontology Prototype Vectors

Selecting a single vector to represent an entire class or ontology concept from instance embeddings is non-trivial. Canonical candidates include:

mean (centroid)
coordinatewise median
geometric median
medoid (most centrally located instance)
Chebyshev/min-max center
density-weighted and eigenvector-centrality-weighted centroids

These can be combined, e.g., by a supervised linear model, to yield a more robust representative vector, surpassing naïve mean or median for downstream similarity or clustering tasks (Jayawardana et al., 2017).

Hierarchical and Order-Encoded Representations

Order or hierarchy can be encoded in the binary domain by enforcing $b_{i,j}=1 \implies b_{a,j}=1$ for every $j$ such that $a$ is-a $i$ , making use of Boolean implications. This geometric partial order is natively transitive and highly compact (Gyurek et al., 2024).

4. Representation Vectors in Model Architecture: End-to-End and Fixed Strategies

In neural classifiers, end-to-end learned class-representative vectors (class prototypes) are standard. However, freezing randomly initialized prototypes—i.e., sampling the last-layer class vectors from a near-orthogonal distribution and holding them fixed—yields increased inter-class separability, intra-class compactness, and often improved or matched classification accuracy. This approach forces the encoder to resolve all class geometry, precluding the classifier from encoding unwanted class similarities (Shalev et al., 2020).

Representation vectors also underpin efficient retrieval (binary document hashes), word sense disambiguation (multi-prototype word representations with Gumbel-Softmax relaxations), and interpretable, debiased representations via correction vectors (where corrections to original feature space are learned as explicit $\mathbb{R}^d$ offsets) (Grzegorczyk, 2019, Cerrato et al., 2022).

5. Algebraic, Algorithmic, and Combinatorial Aspects

Decomposition and Set Reasoning

Given a vector that sums several basis vectors (e.g., semantic word vectors), certain sparse decomposition techniques such as LASSO-style optimization or Dual Polytope Projection can, under information-theoretic bounds, exactly recover which basis elements and weights comprise the set (Summers-Stay et al., 2018). This enables precise set-level reasoning, analogical inference, and class simplex identification entirely in vector spaces.

Positional Vector Systems

Generalizing positional number systems $(b, D)$ to $\mathbb{R}^m$ , one can represent a vector via

$x = \sum_{k=0}^n M^k d_k, \quad d_k \in D \subset \mathbb{Z}^m,$

with non-singular matrix base $M$ , supporting efficient parallel addition and guaranteeing eventually periodic expansions for rational coordinates under suitable $M$ and $D$ (Farkas et al., 2023).

Vector Symbolic Architectures

VSAs formalize high-dimensional vector-based encoding for objects, roles, and sequences. Binding/unbinding, structure encoding, and phrase composition are achieved via addition and random-matrix multiplication, enabling linear-time encoding and exact perceptron learnability properties for large-scale, structured representations (Gallant et al., 2015).

6. Applications and Empirical Outcomes

Representation vectors are the backbone of:

Language modeling (word, sentence, document embeddings; BERT, doc2vec) (Grzegorczyk, 2019)
Image and video retrieval (VLAD, VLAC, flexgrid2vec) (Hamdi et al., 2020, Abbas et al., 2015)
Fair and interpretable debiased learning (correction vectors) (Cerrato et al., 2022)
Bias measurement and steering in LLMs via learned concept directions (Cyberey et al., 27 Feb 2025, Cyberey et al., 23 Apr 2025)
Hierarchical knowledge encoding (Binder’s binary vectors) (Gyurek et al., 2024)
Set function learning, graph and tensor neural architectures via universal sum-decomposable models (Tabaghi et al., 2023)

Empirical studies demonstrate the effectiveness of these constructions: fixed class-vectors often outperform learned ones in classification accuracy and robustness (Shalev et al., 2020), dense and sparse semantic vectors unlock set-level reasoning capabilities (Summers-Stay et al., 2018), and binary correction-based debiasing yields performance and fairness indistinguishable from unconstrained methods but with full interpretability (Cerrato et al., 2022).

7. Challenges, Limitations, and Future Directions

Although highly expressive, representation vector methodologies confront several open issues:

Dimensionality vs. expressiveness trade-offs: Universal set function representations may require dimension O(N^d) in the most general case (Tabaghi et al., 2023), but identifiability and structure can dramatically lower requirements.
Interpretability: Dense, learned representations are less interpretable than sparse or hand-coded alternatives, motivating hybrid schemes and vector-based correction/debiasing modules (Faruqui et al., 2015, Cerrato et al., 2022).
Multi-dimensionality of concepts: Steering with a single concept vector is limited when semantic axes are largely non-linear or multi-dimensional (Cyberey et al., 27 Feb 2025).
Efficiency of algebraic computation: Exact decomposition and parallel algorithms are theoretically sound but may be prohibitive for very large-scale real-world settings or require further advances in screening and matrix-based computation (Summers-Stay et al., 2018, Farkas et al., 2023).
Cross-modal and multi-entity compositionality: Extensions to hybrid and multi-modal spaces (text+images+structured knowledge) are active areas, as are models that aggregate or bind inputs from heterogeneous sources (Behera et al., 2017, Tabaghi et al., 2023).

Future work entails: joint learning and decomposition of dictionary elements and decomposition weights; extending order or region-based representations to encode more nuanced relations efficiently; scaling parallel arithmetic and universal set encodings to massive data; and systematic characterization of multi-dimensional concept steering, especially in deeply layered architectures.

References: