Proteina Atomistica: Atom-by-Atom Protein Modeling

• Proteina Atomistica is a framework that models protein structures atom-by-atom, providing precise mapping of backbones, side chains, and active sites.
• It harnesses advanced generative methods—including conditional flows and Transformer layers—to jointly predict sequence, backbone, and side-chain conformations.
• The approach enables high-fidelity validation using experimental data and quantum-level insights, improving metrics like co-designability and side-chain RMSD.

Proteina Atomistica, or fully atomistic protein modeling and design, encompasses both the methodology and the computational frameworks devoted to the explicit, atom-by-atom representation, prediction, and generative modeling of protein structures. The field integrates advances in machine learning, molecular physics, and structural biology to jointly address the spatial arrangement of all atoms in a protein—backbone, side chains, and, in some cases, electronic degrees of freedom—at a resolution suitable for interpreting fine chemical and functional properties.

1. Atomistic Representation and Its Rationale

Atomistic protein modeling refers to representations that assign explicit spatial coordinates to every non-hydrogen and (optionally) hydrogen atom in the protein macromolecule. This allows detailed analyses of packing, side-chain rotameric states, local hydrogen-bonding networks, and the microenvironment of active sites and binding pockets.

Key motivations for atomistic modeling include:

• The requirement for detailed energetics to distinguish between functional and nonfunctional folds, especially for hydrophobic core packing, stereochemistry, and hydrogen bonding.
• The necessity for accurate side-chain modeling in applications such as de novo design, protein–ligand docking, and mutational stability prediction, where residue-level or backbone-only representations are insufficient (Gaines et al., 2017, Du et al., 2020, Geffner et al., 13 Jul 2025).
• The capacity for quantitative comparisons of structural models to experimental reference data (e.g., PDB, cryo-EM, or neutron scattering), which are inherently atom-resolved (Na et al., 2018, Trellet et al., 2020).

2. Atomistic Generative Modeling Frameworks

Recent advances in deep learning have produced architectures capable of learning the joint distribution of all-atom protein structures, sequences, and side-chain conformations. Notable frameworks include:

Proteina Atomistica: This is a unified, flow-based generative model designed to capture the coupled distribution over backbone coordinates ($X_{bb}$), sequence ($X_{seq}$), and side-chain atom positions ($X_{sc}$) in a single end-to-end trainable framework. The model uses conditional flow matching for continuous variables (coordinates) and discrete flows for sequence generation. All modalities exchange information via cross-attention and pair-biased Transformer layers, and side-chain atoms are handled via the Atom37 scheme, with local frame-based coordinate prediction (Reidenbach et al., 1 Dec 2025).

La-Proteina: A partially latent variant, La-Proteina, introduces a per-residue continuous latent variable $z$, compressing sequence and side-chain information, while modeling the backbone ($C_\alpha$) explicitly. The generative process then couples explicit backbone coordinates with decoded side chains and sequence via a learned VAE. This allows for efficient, scalable atomistic generation, even for proteins up to 800 residues in length (Geffner et al., 13 Jul 2025).

Energy-Based Models (EBMs): The Atom Transformer EBM assigns a scalar energy $E_\theta(x, c) = f_\theta(A(x,c))$ to a candidate side-chain conformation $x$ in context $c$, modeling the Boltzmann distribution of rotameric states at atomic resolution using a 6-layer atom-based Transformer. The model directly learns from crystallized protein data and captures physicochemical constraints such as packing and hydrogen bonding (Du et al., 2020).

3. Training, Datasets, and Atomistic Fidelity

Atomistic generative models require datasets that provide sequence, structural, and side-chain detail in a mutually consistent format. The recent "𝒟_SYN" dataset aligns synthetic sequences generated with ProteinMPNN to predicted structures, resulting in highly co-designable sequence–structure pairs. Models trained on 𝒟_SYN demonstrate substantial improvements in all-atom structural diversity (+73%) and co-designability (+5%) when compared to models trained on non-aligned or AFDB datasets. The CODES-AA metric (proportion of generated proteins with side-chain RMSD < 2 Å between design and predicted structure) directly quantifies atomistic co-design success (Reidenbach et al., 1 Dec 2025, Geffner et al., 13 Jul 2025).

Flow-matching objectives are used for both continuous and discrete components. For continuous modalities (backbone and side chains), the loss is the mean-squared difference between denoiser output and true velocity along the data-to-noise path; for sequence, a cross-entropy loss against the true amino acid is employed.

4. Atomistic Packing, Density, and Structural Principles

Atomistic representations reveal fundamental principles of protein packing:

• Protein cores exhibit a packing fraction $\phi \approx 0.56$ (explicit hydrogens, calibrated radii), lower than classical “extended-atom” estimates ($\phi\approx0.74$). This agrees quantitatively with disordered, jammed packings of non-spherical, bumpy particles, rationalizing observed core densities in the absence of crystalline order (Gaines et al., 2017).
• Systematic atom-density distribution analysis across 21,255 non-redundant structures shows significant heterogeneity. Atomic density, defined by the local mass within a sphere centered on each atom, correlates inversely with protein size (larger proteins are more loosely packed) and directly with B-factor (lower mobility for densely packed regions) and water content (Touliopoulos et al., 24 May 2025).
• Specialized motifs—coiled-coils, cytochromes—populate high-density clusters, reflecting their structural and functional requirements.
• Accurate modeling of side-chain repacking and mutations requires explicit hydrogen atoms and realistic atomic radii to match experimental rotamer populations and predict destabilizing core mutations (Gaines et al., 2017).

5. Atomistic Normal Modes, Flexibility, and Allostery

Atomistic models enable detailed analysis of protein flexibility and functional motion:

• Normal mode analysis (NMA) using all-atom coordinates, with either full Cartesian or internal (dihedral) degrees of freedom, consistently reproduces the slowest collective modes—such as active-site opening/closing—across different force fields and coordinate representations (Na et al., 2018).
• Persistent homology at atomic resolution, analyzed via atom-specific conjugated simplicial complexes and Wasserstein/Bottleneck metrics, provides rich local descriptors for machine learning models to predict atomic B-factors and thermal fluctuations (consensus r=0.61–0.73) (Bramer et al., 2019).
• Atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations at the million-atom scale resolve both local (active-site) and long-range, allosteric effects, capturing atomic-level interactions, hydrogen bonds, salt bridges, and conformational signalling upon ligand binding (Kolář et al., 2020).

6. Reconstruction, Visualization, and Experimental Validation

Atomistic details are crucial for structure determination and validation:

• Virtual reality–based all-atom reconstruction can infer heavy-atom positions from backbone ($C_\alpha$) coordinates by projecting into discrete Frenet frames, mapping atoms onto spheres, and detecting rotamer clusters dependent on local secondary structure. This method improves rotamer recovery and exposes outlier side-chain conformations (Peng et al., 2014).
• Differentiable molecular libraries such as TorchProteinLibrary provide efficient and analytic gradients for the mapping from internal dihedral angles to full Cartesian atomic coordinates, essential for deep learning pipelines (Derevyanko et al., 2018).
• Integration of experimental data—particularly cryo-EM density maps—enables sub-angstrom atomic model building via protocols embedding EM-derived energy terms into force fields for structure refinement. HADDOCK-EM achieves $0.6\pm0.4$ Å interface RMSD from 9.8 Å maps, confirming the ability to realize "Proteina Atomistica" accuracy from medium-resolution experiments (Trellet et al., 2020).

7. Quantum-Mechanical and Atomistic Electronics

A frontier in atomistic modeling is the explicit quantum treatment of protein electronic structure:

• "Quantum proteomics" leverages linear-scaling quantum chemistry to compute electronic wavefunctions, energy levels, charge distributions, and molecular dipole moments for entire proteins, facilitating electronic fingerprints and refined electrostatics for interaction studies (Pichierri, 2011).
• Neutron scattering measurements of temperature-dependent atomic mean-square displacement in proteins, combined with quantum multi-well models, reveal quantized vibrational states and suggest applications of proteins as atom traps for quantum information at elevated temperatures (Koniukov, 25 Mar 2024).

---

The Proteina Atomistica paradigm defines both the technical frontier and central organizing principle of modern generative, analytic, and functional protein modeling at atomic detail. It constitutes the methodological basis for next-generation protein engineering, mechanistic biophysics, and the integration of computational and experimental structure determination.