Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Multivalued BSDEs with Jumps

Updated 27 November 2025
  • Multivalued backward stochastic differential equations with jumps are defined by incorporating maximal monotone operators to enforce time-dependent constraints.
  • They integrate both Brownian motion and jump processes, modeled via Poisson random measures, to capture system uncertainties and moving boundaries.
  • Analytical techniques like penalization methods and Itô’s formula with jump components ensure the existence, uniqueness, and stability of solutions.

A multivalued backward stochastic differential equation (MBSDE) with jumps is a backward SDE in which the drift or reflection term is governed by a multivalued maximal monotone operator or, equivalently, a constraint that forces the unknown process to remain within a time-dependent (possibly random) domain. The noise driving the SDE includes both a Brownian motion and a jump source, typically modeled by a Poisson random measure. MBSDEs with jumps frequently arise in stochastic control, constrained optimization, and mathematical finance where solutions must remain feasible with respect to moving constraints or domains.

1. Mathematical Formulation

The general framework for MBSDEs with jumps is as follows. Consider a filtered probability space (Ω,F,P)(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, \mathbf{P}) supporting:

  • a dd-dimensional Brownian motion WW,
  • an independent Poisson random measure p(dt,de)p(dt, de) on [0,T]×U[0, T] \times U (for some UR{0}U \subset \mathbb{R}^\ell \setminus \{0\}),
  • and its compensated martingale measure μ~(dt,de)=p(dt,de)λ(de)dt\tilde{\mu}(dt, de) = p(dt, de) - \lambda(de) dt.

The unknowns are quadruples (Y,Z,V,K)(Y, Z, V, K) of processes (whose precise regularity depends on the setting). The MBSDE with jumps in a time-dependent domain has the abstract form

Yt=ξ+tTf(s,Ys,Zs,Vs())dstTZsdWstTUVs(e)μ~(ds,de)+KTKt, YtDt for all t, 0TYsx,dKs0 x:xsDs,\begin{aligned} Y_t &= \xi + \int_t^T f(s, Y_s, Z_s, V_s(\cdot)) ds - \int_t^T Z_s dW_s - \int_t^T\int_U V_s(e) \tilde{\mu}(ds, de) + K_T - K_t, \ Y_t &\in D_t \text{ for all } t, \ \int_0^T \langle Y_{s-} - x, dK_s \rangle &\le 0 \quad \forall\ x: x_s \in D_s, \end{aligned}

where KK is a finite-variation adapted process enforcing the constraint, and the Skorokhod-type condition ensures that the increments of KK are active only when YY is on the boundary of DtD_t (Fakhouri et al., 2015). In one dimension or with special domain geometry, the multivalued term can be written via maximal monotone operators kt()k_t(\cdot), leading to the generalized BSDE

Yt+tTUsds=ξ+tTf(s,Ys,Zs,ψs)dstTZsdWstTUψs(e)N~(ds,de),Y_t + \int_t^T U_s ds = \xi + \int_t^T f(s, Y_s, Z_s, \psi_s) ds - \int_t^T Z_s dW_s - \int_t^T\int_{\mathcal{U}} \psi_s(e) \tilde{N}(ds, de),

with Utkt(Yt)U_t \in k_t(Y_t) (Elmansouri et al., 26 Nov 2025). Equivalently, the multivalued reflection is encoded by dKtIDt(Yt)dtdK_t \in \partial I_{D_t}(Y_t)\,dt, where IDt\partial I_{D_t} is the subdifferential of the indicator of DtD_t.

2. Maximal Monotone Operators and Time-Dependent Domains

The mathematical representation of multivaluedness is via maximal monotone operators. In the multidimensional (convex domain) case, the operator corresponds to the inward-normal cone to DtD_t. In the one-dimensional setting relevant to moving boundaries, each time tt is associated with an operator ktk_t induced by an increasing, right-continuous function k(t,)k(t, \cdot) with domain Dt={x:x>at}{at if k(t,at)>}\mathcal{D}_t = \{x: x > a_t\} \cup \{a_t \text{ if } k(t, a_t) > -\infty\}, where ata_t is a (possibly random) lower boundary. The graph of ktk_t is

Gr(kt)={(x,y):xDt,y[k(t,x),k(t,x)]},\operatorname{Gr}(k_t) = \{ (x, y): x \in \mathcal{D}_t,\, y \in [k_-(t, x),\, k(t, x)] \},

with k(t,x)k_-(t,x) being the left limit. Notably, maximal monotone structure guarantees well-posedness and admits penalization approaches in the existence proofs (Elmansouri et al., 26 Nov 2025).

For multidimensional domains, D=(Dt)t[0,T]D = (D_t)_{t \in [0, T]} is assumed closed, convex, nonempty-interior, Ft\mathcal{F}_t-adapted, and continuous in the Hausdorff metric. This flexibility is essential to encode time-dependent constraints such as stochastic barriers or moving obstacles (Fakhouri et al., 2015).

3. Main Assumptions and Technical Conditions

The typical set of hypotheses for well-posedness consists of:

  • Terminal condition: ξ\xi square-integrable, lying a.s. in the terminal domain, e.g., ξL2\xi \in L^2 with ξDT\xi \in D_T (Fakhouri et al., 2015), or ξaT\xi \geq a_T in the moving boundary setting (Elmansouri et al., 26 Nov 2025).
  • Driver conditions: ff is measurable, square-integrable at zero, and Lipschitz in unknowns; for jump components, monotonicity in the jump parameter is required (e.g., for ψ\psi, see (A.2)(iv)) and in general

f(t,y,z,v)f(t,y,z,v)L(yy+zz+vvL2(U,λ))\|f(t, y, z, v) - f(t, y', z', v')\| \leq L \bigl( \|y - y'\| + \|z - z'\| + \|v - v'\|_{L^2(U, \lambda)} \bigr)

(Fakhouri et al., 2015).

  • Domain conditions: The family DtD_t (or ata_t for 1D) is adapted, with regularity to ensure that projections ΠDt\Pi_{D_t} and Hausdorff-continuity arguments apply.
  • Operator integrability: For moving boundaries, local-in-time L1L^1 and L2L^2 conditions for k(t,y)k(t, y) on compact intervals above the lower boundary (see (B.1)-(B.2) in (Elmansouri et al., 26 Nov 2025)), supporting uniform estimates in penalized equations.
  • Interior point condition: Existence of a suitable interior point process AtA_t strictly inside DtD_t for all tt, with a nonzero minimum distance to the boundary, as in the multidimensional framework (Fakhouri et al., 2015).

4. Existence, Uniqueness, and Penalization Methods

The existence and uniqueness of solutions rely on approximating the multivalued problem with a sequence of standard BSDEs with single-valued penalized drivers, and then passing to the limit.

Penalization for Multidimensional RBSDEs:

Penalized equations take the form

{Ytn=ξ+tTf(s,Ysn,Zsn,Vsn)dstTZsndWstTUVsn(e)μ~(ds,de)+(KTnKtn), Ktn=n0t(YsnΠDs(Ysn))ds,\begin{cases} Y^n_t = \xi + \int_t^T f(s, Y^n_s, Z^n_s, V^n_s) ds - \int_t^T Z^n_s dW_s - \int_t^T\int_U V^n_s(e) \tilde{\mu}(ds, de) + (K^n_T - K^n_t), \ K^n_t = -n \int_0^t (Y^n_s - \Pi_{D_s}(Y^n_s)) ds, \end{cases}

where ΠDs\Pi_{D_s} is the Euclidean projection onto DsD_s (Fakhouri et al., 2015). Existence and unique solvability for each nn is standard; convergence as nn \to \infty is established using uniform estimates, stability, and monotonicity.

Penalization for 1D Moving Boundary:

A monotone sequence of Lipschitz approximations knk_n to kk is constructed so that

Ytn=ξ+tT(f(s,Ysn,Zsn,ψsn)kn(s,Ysn))dstTZsndWstTUψsn(e)N~(ds,de),Y^n_t = \xi + \int_t^T (f(s, Y^n_s, Z^n_s, \psi^n_s) - k_n(s, Y^n_s)) ds - \int_t^T Z^n_s dW_s - \int_t^T\int_U \psi^n_s(e) \tilde{N}(ds, de),

and the associated finite variation process is Ktn=0tkn(s,Ysn)dsK^n_t = -\int_0^t k_n(s, Y^n_s) ds (Elmansouri et al., 26 Nov 2025). The monotonicity ensures YnY^n increases to the solution, and that Zn,ψn,KnZ^n, \psi^n, K^n converge in the appropriate norms.

Both frameworks utilize Itô’s formula (including jump terms and local times) to derive the required a priori estimates and establish convergence.

5. Core Estimates and Skorokhod-Type Conditions

A priori estimates are critical, both to ensure tightness in solution spaces and to pass to the multivalued limit. These typically take the form: $\E\left[ \sup_{0 \leq t \leq T} |Y_t|^2 + \int_0^T |Z_s|^2 ds + \int_0^T \int_U |V_s(e)|^2 \lambda(de) ds + |K_T|^2 \right] \leq C \cdot \text{(data norm)},$ where constants depend on the data and domain geometry (Fakhouri et al., 2015).

Skorokhod conditions generalize normal reflection to the multivalued/jump setup. For domains, the constraint is that

0TYsx,dKs0,x adapted with xsDs,\int_0^T \langle Y_{s-} - x, dK_s \rangle \leq 0, \quad \forall\, x \text{ adapted with } x_s \in D_s,

ensuring that KK pushes minimally to confine YY to DtD_t. In the maximal monotone formalism, this becomes the condition

0T(Ysαs)(dKs+βsds)0(αs,βs)Graph(ks),\int_0^T (Y_s - \alpha_s)\, (dK_s + \beta_s ds) \leq 0 \quad \forall\, (\alpha_s, \beta_s) \in \text{Graph}(k_s),

encoding both reflection on the boundary and non-intrusive evolution in the interior (Elmansouri et al., 26 Nov 2025).

6. Extensions: Unbounded Domains and Local Theory

The theory accommodates unbounded time-varying domains provided growth-control conditions for k(t,x)k(t, x) are imposed (cf. assumption (C) in (Elmansouri et al., 26 Nov 2025)), ensuring that penalization remains well-posed and solutions do not explode. The existence–uniqueness methodology is local-in-time on stopping intervals and then patched globally via monotonicity and a comparison principle.

Local results for RBSDEs with jumps on subintervals are also established in the multidimensional theory, allowing for patching of local solutions when the domain is only piecewise constant in time (Fakhouri et al., 2015).

7. Functional Settings and Notation

Common function spaces for well-posedness are as follows:

  • S2(Rm)S^2(\mathbb{R}^m): càdlàg adapted processes YY with $\E [\sup_{t \leq T} |Y_t|^2]<\infty$,
  • M2(Rm×d)M^2(\mathbb{R}^{m \times d}): predictable processes ZZ with $\E \int_0^T \|Z_s\|^2 ds<\infty$,
  • L2(μ~;Rm)L^2(\tilde{\mu}; \mathbb{R}^m): predictable V(s,e)V(s,e) with $\E \int_0^T\int_U |V_s(e)|^2 \lambda(de) ds < \infty$,
  • A2(Rm)A^2(\mathbb{R}^m): adapted, nondecreasing, vanishing at zero, $\E|K_T|^2<\infty$,
  • Hausdorff metric for moving convex sets, and analogous spaces (S2,H2,Hπ2,A2\mathcal{S}^2, \mathcal{H}^2, \mathcal{H}^2_\pi, \mathcal{A}^2) in the 1D setting (Fakhouri et al., 2015, Elmansouri et al., 26 Nov 2025).

These frameworks allow uniform estimates to be derived and ensure the requisite compactness for passing to the limit in penalizations.


For precise statements, assumptions, and proofs, see "Reflected backward stochastic differential equations with jumps in time-dependent random convex domains" (Fakhouri et al., 2015) and "Multivalued backward stochastic differential equations with jumps and moving boundary" (Elmansouri et al., 26 Nov 2025).

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Multivalued Backward Stochastic Differential Equation with Jumps.