Internal Classifiers: Deep Learning & Category Theory

• Internal classifiers (ICs) are context-dependent mechanisms that function as lightweight prediction heads in neural networks and as universal algebraic classifiers in category theory.
• In deep learning, ICs are implemented as shallow MLPs at intermediate layers, enabling early exit through ensemble voting and mutual information maximization.
• In category theory, internal classifiers are constructed as codescent objects of simplicial T-algebras, providing universal properties for algebraic extensions and robust operad constructions.

An internal classifier (IC) is a context-dependent term encompassing technically distinct but conceptually unified phenomena in both deep learning and category theory. In deep learning, an IC is typically a lightweight prediction module attached to an intermediate layer of a neural network, enabling early predictions and facilitating inference-time computation-accuracy trade-offs. In higher category theory and abstract algebra, an internal algebra classifier is a universal ambient structure encapsulating models of an algebraic theory internal to a given context, and is foundational in the theory of algebraic Kan extensions, operads, and codescent objects. This article presents a comprehensive exposition of both paradigms, elucidating their definitions, universal properties, objectives, computational mechanisms, and theoretical implications, with emphasis on authoritative findings and rigorous formalism from the referenced literature.

1. Internal Classifiers in Deep Learning Models

A deep learning internal classifier is a prediction head—usually a shallow multi-layer perceptron (MLP)—attached to an intermediate hidden state of a deep model, such as a transformer. Given a model with $L$ layers and associated hidden states $h_1, h_2, \ldots, h_L$, an IC $f_\theta$ injected at layer $i$ yields a predictive distribution:

$X_i = f_\theta(h_i)$

where $X_i$ denotes a probability distribution over task labels. The key operational advantage is that $X_i$ can serve as a prediction, allowing the sample to "exit" inference early rather than necessarily traversing all subsequent layers ("early exit") (Sun et al., 2021).

2. Ensemble Theory and Training Objectives for Internal Classifiers

Instead of training each IC in isolation, recent advances treat $\{X_1, \ldots, X_L\}$ as an ensemble to maximize the mutual information $I(X_{1:L}; Y)$ between all IC outputs and the true label $Y$. Leveraging results from Fano’s and Hellman–Raviv inequalities, reducing prediction error corresponds to maximizing $I(X_{1:l};Y)$. An ensemble-theoretic decomposition yields the lower bound [Zhou & Li, 2010]:

$$I(X_{1:l};Y) \geq \sum_{i=1}^l I(X_i; Y) - \sum_{i=2}^l I(X_i; X_{1:i-1}),$$

approximating $I(X_i;Y)$ by cross-entropy (CE) with the ground truth and $I(X_i; X_{1:i-1})$ by the maximal pairwise mutual information.

The per-sample objective is:

$$L = L_{\mathrm{rel}} + L_{\mathrm{div}} = \sum_{i=1}^L \mathrm{CE}(X_i, Y) - \lambda \sum_{i=2}^L \min_{j<i} \mathrm{CE}(X_i, X_j)$$

where

• $\mathrm{CE}(X_i, Y)$ is the standard cross-entropy loss for accuracy ("relevancy loss"),
• $\mathrm{CE}(X_i, X_j)$ is the cross-entropy between two classifier outputs,
• $\lambda \in (0,1)$ adjusts the trade-off between accuracy and diversity.

The diversity loss encourages differences among IC predictions, facilitating ensemble complementarities and error decorrelation (Sun et al., 2021).

3. Computational Role and Mechanistic Details of the Diversity Term

To efficiently approximate the intractable mutual information $I(X_i; X_{1:i-1})$, the diversity component focuses on the most correlated predecessor: $\max_{j < i} I(X_i; X_j)$. Since KL-divergence-based mutual information maximization is approximated by minimizing cross-entropy between $X_i$ and $X_j$, the diversity loss per layer $i$ becomes:

$$L_{\mathrm{div},i} = - \min_{j < i} \mathrm{CE}(X_i, X_j)$$

This encourages each new IC to introduce a distribution most different from its closest prior IC, resulting in a set of classifiers providing ensemble diversity that can be exploited for robust predictions (Sun et al., 2021).

4. Early Exit Strategies via Ensemble Voting

At inference, an early-exit decision is made by aggregating predictions from all current and earlier ICs using a voting-based strategy:

1. For each layer $l = 1, \dots, L$:
   • Compute $X_l$ and derive hard prediction $p_l = \arg\max_c X_l(c)$.
   • Tally votes $v_c = |\{j \leq l: p_j = c\}|$ for class $c$.
   • Compute scaled max-vote statistic $V_l = \max_c v_c / l^k$ with $k \in [0,1)$.
   • If $V_l \geq \delta$ (threshold), exit and output $c^* = \arg\max_c v_c$.
2. If no exit, use the prediction at layer $L$.

Varying $(\delta, k)$ allows control of the accuracy-versus-computation trade-off: lower thresholds favor speed, while stricter thresholds favor accuracy (Sun et al., 2021).

5. Empirical Performance in NLP Benchmarks

Experiments on GLUE-style binary tasks (CoLA, MRPC, QQP, RTE, SST-2) and multiclass tasks (AG's News, SST-5, TREC) using ALBERT-base and BERT-base demonstrate that jointly optimizing IC accuracy and diversity, coupled with the voting-based early-exit mechanism, yields superior accuracy–speed trade-offs compared to both independently trained ICs and single-IC exit methods. Notably:

• On ALBERT-base (≈1.5× speed-up), ensemble-trained ICs with voting reach 83.7% average accuracy, outperforming PABEE (82.8%) by 0.9 points.
• On multiclass tasks (≈2.0× speed-up), accuracy improves by 0.8 points over PABEE (82.4% vs. 81.6%).
• Similar gains are registered on BERT (e.g., SST-2, ~0.8–1.0% accuracy improvement) (Sun et al., 2021).

6. Internal Algebra Classifiers in Category Theory

In higher category theory, an internal algebra classifier is a universal object that mediates between algebraic structures internal to a base category. Given a 2-monad $(\K, T)$ and an "internalisable adjunction of 2-monads" $F: (C, S) \to (K, T)$, the strict $T$-algebra

$T^S = \operatorname{CoDesc}(R^F S)$

serves as the internal $S$-algebra classifier, characterized by a strict universal property:

$$F\textrm{-}\mathrm{Alg}(T^S, A) \simeq S\textrm{-}\mathrm{Alg}_\ell(1, F^*A).$$

Morphisms between such classifiers correspond to left Kan extensions, subject to Guitart-exactness conditions, which ensure that algebraic structure is preserved. This theory unifies the construction of free algebras, PROPs, Feynman categories, and the modular envelope of operads via codescent objects of crossed internal categories (Weber, 2015, Weber, 2015).

7. Universal Properties, Codescent, and Theoretical Significance

Internal algebra classifiers are constructed as codescent objects of simplicial $T$-algebras built from adjunctions of 2-monads. Sufficient conditions for existence include:

• Finiteness of monads,
• Existence and preservation of codescent objects,
• Stability of opfibrations under relevant functors (Weber, 2015).

In operad theory, this realization provides a systematic underpinning for constructions such as free symmetric monoidal categories containing a monoid, PROPs, and the transfer of model structures along forgetful functors. The Guitart-exactness of the square corresponding to a morphism of classifiers guarantees that the associated left Kan extension remains within the category of algebras, establishing a robust framework for automatic algebraicity in a wide variety of contexts including Feynman categories and polynomial monads (Weber, 2015).

---

Table: Comparison of Internal Classifier Paradigms

Aspect	Deep Learning ICs	Categorical Internal Algebra Classifiers
Definition	Intermediate prediction heads in neural nets	Universal ambient objects in 2-category theory
Construction	Lightweight MLPs over hidden states	Codescent objects of simplicial $T$-algebras
Objective	Early exit, speed–accuracy trade-off	Mediate algebraic left Kan extensions
Key Theoretical Tools	Ensemble mutual information, cross-entropy, voting	Codescent, monad adjunctions, Guitart-exactness
Notable Applications	NLP inference acceleration	Operads, Feynman categories, PROP construction

Both manifestations of internal classifiers provide rigorous, universal tools—either for efficient computation in machine learning models, or for unifying constructions in higher algebra and category theory. Their formal properties, as established in the referenced literature, undergird a host of modern developments at the intersection of computation and algebraic structure (Sun et al., 2021, Weber, 2015, Weber, 2015).