Home-made Diffusion Model (HDM)

• HDM is a generative modeling approach characterized by modular architectures like Cross-U-Transformer and token routing that enhance resource efficiency and compositional fidelity.
• HDM employs novel training strategies such as shifted square crop and progressive resolution scaling to boost convergence speed and maintain high output quality.
• HDM’s strong mathematical foundations, including score matching and SDE parameterization, ensure rigorous convergence guarantees and fidelity in generated samples.

The Home-made Diffusion Model (HDM) refers to a class of generative modeling approaches—often designed and implemented by individual researchers or small organizations—that leverage theoretical, architectural, and algorithmic innovations to construct efficient, high-quality diffusion models, adapted for tractable deployment and extensibility. HDM approaches span textual, image, motion, and anomaly detection domains, characterized by modular architecture, democratized computational requirements, and tailored algorithmic interventions. The term “HDM” is used in multiple recent works to denote either specific architectural advances (e.g., Cross-U-Transformer for text-to-image (Yeh, 7 Sep 2025)), algorithmic generalizations (e.g., random feature methods (Saha et al., 2023)), hierarchical motion synthesis (Xie et al., 2023), and unified anomaly detection (Weng et al., 26 Feb 2025), making it central in the contemporary literature on custom and scalable diffusion models.

1. Architectural Innovations

Home-made Diffusion Models distinguish themselves from canonical architectures (U-Nets, ConvNets, standard Transformers) through several design choices:

• Cross-U-Transformer (XUT): HDM for text-to-image generation employs a transformer architecture with U-shaped encoder–decoder symmetry, where skip connections are replaced by cross-attention modules. This modifies feature propagation; decoder queries attend to encoder representations via attention weights $y = \text{softmax}(QK^T/\sqrt{d_k})V$, with $Q$ as queries, $K$ as keys, and $V$ as values, ensuring robust integration of spatial-semantic information. Cross-attentional skips provide compositional consistency not achievable with direct concatenation or addition (Yeh, 7 Sep 2025).
• Token Routing (TREAD Acceleration): Building on efficient token selection during training, only the most relevant feature tokens are forwarded and updated in intermediate layers. This reduces computational load, accelerates convergence, and maintains image quality by concentrating modeling resources on “active” tokens.
• Hierarchical and Modular Designs: In B2A-HDM for motion synthesis, the architecture is split into basic (low-dimensional) and advanced (high-dimensional) diffusion stages, with multi-denoiser frameworks adapting reverse process complexity via multiple specialized denoisers (Xie et al., 2023).

The sum effect is improved resource efficiency, adaptive feature handling, and enhanced generative capabilities relative to monolithic models.

2. Training Strategies and Optimization

HDMs introduce novel approaches for efficient, scalable training:

• Shifted Square Crop Strategy: For images, instead of fixed region cropping, crops shift systematically across epochs, improving spatial coverage, mitigating edge artifacts, and increasing sample diversity.
• Progressive Resolution Scaling: Training commences on low-resolution samples and incrementally introduces higher resolutions, following curriculum learning that first fits global structures before refining local details. This results in improved optimization stability and generation fidelity.
• Integrated Loss Functions: In human motion modeling and anomaly detection, HDM incorporates domain-specific geometric (e.g., position, velocity, foot contact) losses (Tevet et al., 2022), or joint generative–discriminative objectives combining mean squared and cross-entropy components (Weng et al., 26 Feb 2025), ensuring physical plausibility and robust classification.

Such strategies directly contribute to convergence speed, reduced overfitting, and highest sample quality per compute-dollar expended.

3. Mathematical Foundations and Theoretical Guarantees

Mathematical rigor underpins HDM formulations:

• Kernel and SDE Parameterization: Flexible parameterization of forward SDEs via learnable drift and anisotropic metrics (e.g., Riemannian metric $R(x)$ and symplectic form $\omega$) enables HDM to generalize classical VP/VE SDEs, with convergence guarantees to target distributions and ergodicity preserved by anti-symmetric dynamics (Du et al., 2022).
• Score Matching and Variational Bounds: Core objectives reduce to denoising score matching and maximizing the ELBO, with loss terms taking the form:

$$\mathcal{L}_{\text{DM}} = \mathbb{E}_{x_0,t,\epsilon} \|\epsilon_\theta(x_t,t) - \epsilon\|^2$$

and for image generation,

$$x_t = \sqrt{\bar{\alpha}_t}x_0 + \sqrt{1-\bar{\alpha}_t}\epsilon$$

• Random Feature Generalization Bounds: In interpretable HDMs, the function class (at each time step) is equivalent to standard random feature expansions and admits non-asymptotic bounds on sample generation error:

$$\|f^\sharp - f^*\|_2 \leq \frac{C\sqrt{d}}{\sqrt{N}}(1+\sqrt{2\log(1/\delta)})$$

with total variation bounds on the gap between generated and true distributions (Saha et al., 2023).

Mathematical structuring ensures both expressive and theoretically tractable generative models.

4. Domain-Specific Extensions and Applications

HDMs can be specialized for domain applications:

• Text-to-Image Generation: The HDM (Yeh, 7 Sep 2025) achieves competitive 1024x1024 quality with only $535-620 training cost and four RTX5090 GPUs. Cross-attention, TREAD, and progressive scaling result in not only superior image quality (as measured by FID), but also emergent features such as camera viewpoint control.
• Human Motion Synthesis: Transformer-based HDMs (Tevet et al., 2022, Xie et al., 2023) enable both text-to-motion and action-to-motion. Multi-denoiser structures and hierarchical latent as well as geometric loss design establish high fidelity in both overall and fine-grained motion outputs, setting state-of-the-art on HumanML3D and KIT-ML.
• Anomaly Detection: Unified hybrid architectures merge generative (Diffusion Anomaly Generation Module) and discriminative (Diffusion Discriminative Module) processes. The probability optimization module further refines pixel and feature-level distributions, leading to outstanding AUROC in industrial and medical defect detection (Weng et al., 26 Feb 2025).
• Efficient Data Synthesis and Denoising: Random feature HDMs facilitate interpretable models trainable with smaller datasets and fewer parameters, validated on Fashion-MNIST and audio data (Saha et al., 2023).

These domain-driven innovations illustrate HDM’s adaptability across tasks including generative modeling, restoration, detection, and structured data generation.

5. Performance Metrics and Comparative Studies

Empirical evaluation of HDM highlights:

• FID, IS, NLL: Across benchmarks (ImageNet, LSUN, CIFAR10, HumanML3D, MVTec-AD), HDMs consistently reach or surpass the best-known scores, often with fewer trainable parameters or reduced step counts. For example, HDM achieves FID 3.05 on CIFAR10 (Zhang et al., 28 Apr 2025); in anomaly detection, near-perfect AUROC of 99.5%/99.1% for image/pixel-level tasks (Weng et al., 26 Feb 2025).
• Efficiency: Training time and cost are substantially reduced (cf. classic diffusion models), with novel architectures and algorithms enabling model deployment on non-premium hardware. Ablation studies confirm that key innovations such as cross-attention and multi-denoiser frameworks are critical to gains.
• Emergent Properties: Some HDMs display capabilities absent in baseline models—e.g., controllable scene composition, editability, detail consistency, and even inpainting and in-shot control in text-to-image systems.

The result is a paradigm shift away from brute-force scaling toward architectural and algorithmic ingenuity.

6. Implications for Model Democratization and Future Research

HDM marks a shift in the scaling paradigm for generative modeling:

• Lowered Hardware Requirements: By reducing computational intensity, HDMs enable high-quality generative AI for broader audiences, moving beyond elite institutional compute clusters.
• Open-Source and Reproducibility: Published implementations and model weights encourage experimentation, benchmarking, and personalized extension.
• Potential Proliferation and Innovation: With democratized access, new and niche applications are foreseeable, including domain-specific models and integrations into industrial, medical, and creative workflows.
• Research Directions: The literature identifies future focal points on improving sampling efficiency and inference via coefficient matrix optimization (Zheng et al., 11 Mar 2025), extending hierarchical and modular architectures, and tackling domain-specific challenges such as extreme anomaly complexity or latent-space inversion.

HDM’s comprehensive approach thus signals broader accessibility and continuous evolution in diffusion-based generative modeling.

7. Connections to Foundational Theory and Methodological Unification

HDMs often distill and unify core ideas from the broader diffusion modeling literature:

• Paper-to-Code Standardization: Utilizing unified notational conventions (Ding et al., 22 Dec 2024)—e.g., expressing forward process as $$x_t = \sqrt{\bar{\alpha}_t}x_0 + \sqrt{1-\bar{\alpha}_t}\epsilon$$ and reverse process as denoising steps—facilitates rapid prototyping, fair comparison, and transparent implementation of various diffusion approaches.
• Score-Matching and ELBO Equivalence: Training objectives across models can be mapped to noise prediction, score matching, or direct sample prediction strategies, further blurred by parameterizations (e.g., $\epsilon$-prediction, x-prediction, v-prediction), which are transformable within unified frameworks.
• Methodological Extensions: HDMs incorporate post-training methods including progressive and consistency distillation, as well as reward-based fine-tuning—a toolkit for accelerating inference or adapting outputs to reward functions or external criteria.

HDMs integrate foundational innovations with practical implementation guidance, experimental validation, and a path for ongoing extensibility.

---

In summary, the Home-made Diffusion Model (HDM) concept encapsulates the convergence of theoretical generalization, architectural modularity, computational democratization, and empirical efficiency in modern generative modeling. By leveraging domain expertise, innovative training and architecture, and explicit mathematical formalization, HDM provides a robust framework for scalable, high-quality diffusion modeling accessible to a diverse research community.