Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

High-Definition Stereo Video Dataset

Updated 11 December 2025
  • High-definition stereo video datasets are collections of synchronized left/right image sequences captured with calibrated dual-lens rigs, enabling precise 3D correspondence and depth estimation.
  • They use rigorous calibration protocols—including intrinsic/extrinsic calibration, rectification, and temporal synchronization—to ensure geometric and temporal fidelity.
  • These datasets support applications such as stereo matching, view synthesis, super-resolution, and SLAM, providing dense disparity and depth annotations for benchmarking.

A high-definition stereo video dataset is a collection of temporally coherent stereo image pairs (i.e., left/right video streams) captured, constructed, or curated with sufficient spatial and temporal resolution to support modern 3D vision research, including stereo matching, depth/disparity estimation, view synthesis, and algorithmic benchmarking. Such datasets are indispensable for evaluating and training learning-based methods in scenarios demanding precise correspondence, temporal stability, and geometric realism. Contemporary datasets span real-world, synthetic, and hybrid domains, with varying levels of calibration, ground-truth density, modality diversity, and licensing constraints.

1. Dataset Construction and Calibration Protocols

High-definition stereo video datasets are acquired using dual-lens rigs, synchronized multi-sensor arrays, or extracted from existing 3D movie content. Rigorous calibration protocols are fundamental for geometric fidelity:

  • Intrinsic Calibration: Estimation of focal length, principal point, and lens distortion for each camera, often via checkerboard-based approaches (e.g., Zhang's method).
  • Extrinsic Calibration: Left-to-right rotation RR and translation TT between sensors, typically computed once per session; ensures consistent epipolar geometry (Zhang et al., 16 Dec 2024).
  • Rectification: Computation of rectifying transforms aligns corresponding scanlines horizontally, enabling pixelwise disparity search.
  • Temporal Synchronization: Hardware triggering or internal clocks achieve sub-millisecond frame alignment for dynamic scenes, critical for accurate temporal correspondence, as in the Canon RF-S DUAL-lens, ZED, or RED Scarlet-X capture systems (Zhang et al., 16 Dec 2024, Choudhary et al., 2022, Banitalebi-Dehkordi, 2018).
  • Sensor and Baseline Choices: Stereo baselines typically span 8–120 mm, balancing depth sensitivity and eye comfort; some datasets emulate the human interpupillary distance (IPD ≈ 65 mm) for XR/VR compatibility (Xing et al., 10 Dec 2025).

2. Representative High-Definition Stereo Video Datasets

Empirical diversity, spatial fidelity, and annotation richness differentiate existing datasets. Table 1 presents core statistics:

Dataset Seqs Frames Resolution/view FPS Baseline Calib GT Disp License
StereoV1K 1,000 >500,000 1180 × 1180 50 ≈60 mm Full Dense CC BY-NC
StereoWorld-11M 142,520 ≈11,000,000 1920 × 1080 24 55–75 mm (IPD) Inherited Dense CC BY-NC-SA
WSVD 10,788 ≈1,500,000 up to 1920 × 1080 30 Unknown None Semi Research
SVD 310 ≈300,000 1080p–2200² 30 19–63 mm Full Dense CC BY
SHDR 11 6,600 1920 × 1080 30 80 mm Partial Absent* Open/research
SVSR-Set 71 85,200 1920 × 1080 30 ≈120 mm Full Sparse Academic
Helvipad 29 39,553 1920 × 512 eqr 10 191 mm (vert.) Full Dense† CC BY-4.0

*SHDR demonstrates depth map synthesis, but does not release framewise ground truth. †Helvipad combines partial LiDAR and label-dense depth-completion.

Key design parameters include side-by-side (SBS) encoding for consumer content, high frame rates for XR/AR (≥50 Hz), and ground-truth disparity generated either through classical stereo matchers (e.g., IGEV, SGBM) or via active sensors (LiDAR, ZED SDK).

3. Scene, Motion, and Illumination Diversity

Dataset content is engineered or curated to maximize coverage over key environmental and object parameters:

  • Environments: Indoor (offices, homes, retail), outdoor (streets, parks, facades), natural scenes, urban scenes, and synthetic environments (XR indoor modeling) (Zhang et al., 16 Dec 2024, Cheng et al., 2023, Choudhary et al., 2022).
  • Lighting and HDR: Datasets address both low-light (night, shadow), daylight, mixed, and high dynamic range (HDR) scenarios; some incorporate multi-exposure brackets and true HDR capture (18 F-stops, SHDR) (Choudhary et al., 2022, Banitalebi-Dehkordi, 2018).
  • Temporal and Motion Statistics: Camera can be static, stabilized, or freely moving, and scenes may contain objects in rigid, articulated, or deformable motion (people, cars, foliage). Scene descriptors and associated metadata are commonly provided (Zhang et al., 16 Dec 2024).
  • Non-Rigid Content: Internet-mined datasets (WSVD, YouTube-SBS, H2-Stereo) are rich in non-rigid targets such as people and crowds, a critical regime for depth learning (Wang et al., 2019, Shi et al., 30 Sep 2024).
  • Distribution and Sampling: Datasets such as StereoWorld-11M and YouTube-SBS sample from 3D movies and web uploads to achieve statistical coverage over genre, scene type, and lighting (Xing et al., 10 Dec 2025, Shi et al., 30 Sep 2024).

4. Ground-Truth Annotation, Data Formats, and Benchmarking

Datasets differ substantially in annotation scope, modality, and access protocols:

5. Applications and Algorithmic Benchmarks

High-definition stereo video datasets address and enable research across multiple 3D vision domains:

  • Stereo and Disparity Estimation: Supervised pre-training, algorithmic benchmarking, and development of advanced cost aggregation/feature matching algorithms (Zhang et al., 16 Dec 2024, Cheng et al., 2023).
  • Monocular-to-Stereo and Novel View Synthesis: Training/evaluating monocular-to-stereo conversion frameworks, exploiting depth-warping, blend-inpainting, or geometry-aware video diffusion with explicit loss formulations (e.g., depth–disparity constraint Z=fB/dZ = fB/d) (Zhang et al., 16 Dec 2024, Xing et al., 10 Dec 2025).
  • Super-Resolution and Quality Enhancement: Datasets such as SVSR-Set and SVD serve as targets for super-resolution, denoising, view enhancement, and QoE assessment tasks, with ground-truth for both LR↔HR and stereo pairs (Imani et al., 2022, Izadimehr et al., 6 Jun 2025).
  • SLAM, Visual Odometry, and XR Applications: Datasets with frame-level calibration and pose annotation (Synchronized Stereo/Plenoptic, XR-Stereo) provide standard testbeds for VO benchmarking using scale/rotation/translation/trajectory drift metrics (Zeller et al., 2018, Cheng et al., 2023).
  • Panoramic and Omnidirectional Stereo: Helvipad extends to equirectangular and top–bottom rigs, enabling full 360° stereo depth estimation under real-world conditions, benchmarked with adapted models (Zayene et al., 27 Nov 2024).
  • HDR and Multi-Exposure Fusion: SHDR and IIT-M datasets allow paper of 3D HDR coding, tone mapping, stereo depth under extreme dynamic ranges, and the effect of multi-exposure fusion (Choudhary et al., 2022, Banitalebi-Dehkordi, 2018).

6. Limitations and Open Directions

Despite advances in scale, fidelity, and diversity, high-definition stereo video datasets exhibit several limitations:

  • Scene Coverage and Annotation Completeness: Synthetic datasets may lack non-rigid motion, semantic diversity, or environmental variability; web-mined sets trade calibration and ground-truth density for breadth.
  • Temporal Consistency: Many datasets achieve high spatial resolution but may lack high frame rates or temporal length necessary for video-based applications and learning (Imani et al., 2022, Shi et al., 30 Sep 2024).
  • Calibration Consistency: In-the-wild sources (WSVD, YouTube-SBS) lack calibration and may have temporally inconsistent baselines, requiring normalization via special loss functions (e.g., NMG) (Wang et al., 2019).
  • Licensing: Commercial content (e.g., Blu-ray, YouTube) imposes significant limitations on use and redistribution (Xing et al., 10 Dec 2025, Shi et al., 30 Sep 2024).
  • Benchmark Gaps: Some datasets do not release quantitative benchmarks (SHDR), nor do they uniformly support HDR or multi-exposure analysis (Banitalebi-Dehkordi, 2018, Choudhary et al., 2022).

Continued progress is marked by the pursuit of IPD-aligned, temporally stable, annotated, and open-access datasets that combine synthetic scalability with real-world capture fidelity. Multi-modal synchronization (RGB, depth, events, LiDAR), panoramic rigs, and XR/AR integration remain key future axes.

7. Summary Table

Dataset Size Resolution FPS Calib Annotations License
StereoV1K 1,000 × 1,000 1180 × 1180 50 Full Dense disp., scene tags, GPS CC BY-NC
StereoWorld-11M 142K × 81 1920 × 1080 24/12 Inherited Dense disp./depth CC BY-NC-SA
WSVD 10,788 up to 1920×1080 30 None Semi-dense disp., objects Research
SVD 310 1080p–2200×2,200 30 Full Disparity, depth, pose, SI/TI CC BY
SHDR 11 1920 × 1080 30 Partial HDR, depth bracket, SI/TI Open
SVSR-Set 71 1920 × 1080 30 Full (Some) Disparity, motion labels Academic
Helvipad 29 1920 × 512 eqr 10 Full Depth, disparity, completion CC BY-4.0

All statistics and characterizations trace directly to the reviewed primary literature (Zhang et al., 16 Dec 2024, Xing et al., 10 Dec 2025, Wang et al., 2019, Shi et al., 30 Sep 2024, Cheng et al., 2023, Choudhary et al., 2022, Banitalebi-Dehkordi, 2018, Zayene et al., 27 Nov 2024, Izadimehr et al., 6 Jun 2025, Imani et al., 2022, Zeller et al., 2018).

Whiteboard

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to High-Definition Stereo Video Dataset.