Hierarchical Category and Attribute Tokens

• Hierarchical category and attribute tokens are discrete, structured representations capturing multi-level semantic and stylistic features for improved model interpretability and control.
• They enable fine-grained classification and controllable synthesis across modalities such as vision, speech, and product catalogs by leveraging explicit taxonomies and learned decompositions.
• Their extraction relies on specialized architectures and loss functions to maintain accurate token hierarchies and preserve both category and attribute integrity.

Hierarchical category and attribute tokens are structured, discrete representations that encode multilevel semantic, structural, or stylistic information within a range of machine learning and multimodal systems. Such tokens explicitly reflect the compositional, hierarchical nature of real-world taxonomies, ontologies, or signal decompositions, facilitating fine-grained classification, interpretability, and controllable generation across domains including vision, language, speech, graph data, and structured product catalogs.

1. Formal Definitions and Types of Hierarchical Tokens

In contemporary research, hierarchical tokens fall into two principal classes:

• Category tokens: Discrete codes indicating class membership, traversing from coarse-grained to fine-grained levels (e.g., supercategory, category, subcategory, instance). In speech, these often encode "content-preference" (linguistic content); in vision, they represent taxonomic layers or object labels.
• Attribute tokens: Discrete or continuous representations capturing properties, styles, or attributes orthogonal to pure category labels. These may include stylistic features in TTS ("prompt-preference" tokens such as prosody, emotion, scenario), structured product attributes (color, material), or semantic/visual properties (e.g., texture, shape, function) (Nie et al., 23 Sep 2025, Nan et al., 20 Nov 2025, Krishnan et al., 2019, Li et al., 12 Dec 2024, Ding et al., 15 Oct 2024).

Tokens are typically derived from either explicit taxonomies/ontologies (where hierarchies are given), data-driven factorization (via supervised or unsupervised learning), or model-based decomposition using codecs or generative models.

2. Architectures and Token Extraction Mechanisms

Architectural strategies for hierarchical tokenization are tailored to the signal and modality.

• In vision and multimodal models, backbone encoders (e.g., CNNs, Vision Transformers) extract global or ROI (Region-of-Interest) features; token generators (e.g., BART or Q-Former style architectures) then produce ordered token sequences: category tokens at increasing granularity followed by property–value pairs (attributes) (Nan et al., 20 Nov 2025).
• In TTS systems, a latent speech representation is split by a dedicated codec into content-preference (semantic) tokens and prompt-preference (style/attribute) tokens. A hierarchical decoder then reconstructs the full acoustic token stream conditioned on these factors, enabling precise stepwise control (Nie et al., 23 Sep 2025).
• For products and ontologies, hierarchical paths (class-paths) are explicitly constructed via the is-a graph; attribute tokens encode structured (name, value) information via custom tokenization and feature-extraction modules (CNN/LSTM blocks for sequences) (Krishnan et al., 2019, Jiang et al., 2019).

A summary of canonical token hierarchies across domains:

Domain	Category Tokens	Attribute Tokens
Vision/Object Recognition	[Superclass, Category, Subclass]	[Property, Value]
TTS	Content-preference (semantic)	Prompt-preference (style)
Product Categorization	Taxonomic path nodes	Structured attributes
Ontology	Class-path (via hypernymy)	Entity/class attributes
Molecule/Graph	[Atom, Motif, Graph]	Atom/motif-level properties

3. Training Objectives and Factorization Principles

Hierarchical models jointly leverage category and attribute tokens using specialized loss functions reflecting their role in compositional semantics or controllable generation.

• Reconstruction losses (e.g., causal cross-entropy for conditional generation) enforce correct synthesis of sequences mediated by tokens (Nie et al., 23 Sep 2025).
• Attribute-related tokens are forced to align with external objectives: ASR loss for semantic tokens, contrastive style (CLAP) loss for prompt-preference (attribute) tokens.
• In ontology and structured data (TransATT), margin-based ranking or translation-based objectives assure that class-path encodings and attribute embeddings are congruent, with attention layers weighting plausible class–attribute combinations (Jiang et al., 2019).
• In vision–LLMs, multi-level contrastive losses (per-attribute expert tokens and global tokens) and regularization toward frozen CLIP spaces ensure token-level alignment and prevent drift (Ding et al., 15 Oct 2024).

Furthermore, joint decompositions (e.g., sparse coding of category tokens as a supercategory plus sparse attributes (Hwang et al., 2014)) enforce a hierarchical, interpretable embedding.

4. Decoding and Inference in Hierarchical Structures

Generating outputs (e.g., speech, captions, object labels, attribute sets) from hierarchical tokens is performed in a strictly ordered or staged fashion:

• Hierarchical Decoding (HD-PPT): At each timestep, semantic content (T_c) is predicted first, establishing the "what", followed by style or attribute tokens (T_p: "how"), then finally producing the full signal realization (T_s). The conditional factorization:

$$p(T_{h,j}, T_{c,j}, T_{p,j}, T_{s,j} | T_t, T_{s,<j}) = p(T_{h,j}|...) \cdot p(T_{c,j}|...) \cdot p(T_{p,j}|...) \cdot p(T_{s,j}|...)$$

yields accurate transcription and controllability (Nie et al., 23 Sep 2025).

• Coarse-to-Fine Generation (UniDGF): Decoder predicts [c¹, c², c³, p, v] in sequence, ensuring that detailed property recognition is conditioned on coarse semantic context. Property-conditioned attribute recognition is naturally supported, allowing dynamic querying for arbitrary attributes (Nan et al., 20 Nov 2025).
• Diffusion-based Text-to-Image (DiT/AST): Tokens are embedded uniformly but are shown to differentially dominate certain layers/stages of attention, justifying layer-wise tuning for control. Instance/category tokens influence early layers, while attribute tokens modulate later layers, enabling targeted manipulation via tuning masks (Zhang et al., 14 Apr 2025).

5. Applications Across Modalities and Empirical Outcomes

Hierarchical category and attribute tokens have been shown to improve fine-grained recognition, controllable synthesis, interpretability, and generalization.

• Speech Synthesis (HD-PPT): Explicit token decomposition yields state-of-the-art instruction adherence and naturalness, with ablation confirming the necessity of both token types for intelligibility and style (Nie et al., 23 Sep 2025).
• Object Recognition (UniDGF): Joint detection and hierarchical semantic prediction surpass similarity-based and multi-stage baselines, with hierarchical tokenization leading to higher category and attribute accuracy on benchmarks such as MSCOCO, Objects365, and e-commerce catalogs (Nan et al., 20 Nov 2025).
• Product Cataloging: Structured attribute tokens combined with category hierarchy boost flat classification accuracy by ∼2.7% and can generalize to open list attributes, demonstrating practical benefits in large-scale multi-level classification (Krishnan et al., 2019).
• Ontological Reasoning (TransATT): LSTM-encoded class-paths and attribute embeddings achieve high attribute prediction precision, with attention over pathways uncovering entity-specific attribute saliency (Jiang et al., 2019).
• Molecule–Language Alignment (HIGHT): Multi-level graph tokenization substantially reduces surface hallucination and improves both classification and captioning performance across benchmarks, underscoring the value of encoding mid-level "motif" structure (Chen et al., 20 Jun 2024).
• Prompt Learning (TAP, ATPrompt): Embedding structured attribute hierarchies into prompt formulations drives zero-shot and few-shot gains across vision-language transfer tasks, moving beyond category-only approaches (Ding et al., 15 Oct 2024, Li et al., 12 Dec 2024).

6. Interpretability, Controllability, and Theoretical Justification

Hierarchical token decompositions admit compositional interpretations and controllability:

• In unified semantic embeddings, each category token is represented as a parent plus a sparse set of discriminative attribute tokens, enabling interpretable class definitions (e.g., "tiger" = "feline" + "striped") (Hwang et al., 2014).
• Visualizations (e.g., Grad-CAMs for TAP) show that attribute-specific tokens and prompts activate spatially aligned regions, confirming alignment between hierarchy and model attention (Ding et al., 15 Oct 2024).
• Step-layer-wise scheduling of attention tuning in diffusion models prevents over-saturation and isolates layerwise influence of category or attribute tokens, affirming the empirically emergent interaction between hierarchy and model depth (Zhang et al., 14 Apr 2025).

Hierarchical tokenization alleviates the burden of extracting all relevant information from low-level features, allowing models to leverage explicit priors and to separate invariant (category) from variable (attribute) information.

7. Future Directions and Open Challenges

Recent work points toward several promising avenues:

• Universal integration of multi-level token hierarchies across LLM-augmented multimodal systems, especially for open-vocabulary, compositional, or zero/few-shot scenarios.
• Improved interpretability and transparency for decision making, via enforced or learnable attribute hierarchies.
• Extension of hierarchical tokenization to domains beyond current applications, such as hierarchical graph-structured data, cross-lingual or cross-modal transfer, and complex scientific ontologies (Chen et al., 20 Jun 2024).
• Further investigation into joint training strategies, complementary regularization, and alignment losses that exploit these structured decompositions.

Potential challenges remain around attribute set discovery, scalability to very deep or dynamic hierarchies, and efficient inference in extremely fine-grained or open-ended settings.

---

References

(Nie et al., 23 Sep 2025, Nan et al., 20 Nov 2025, Krishnan et al., 2019, Li et al., 12 Dec 2024, Ding et al., 15 Oct 2024, Zhang et al., 14 Apr 2025, Jiang et al., 2019, Hwang et al., 2014, Chen et al., 20 Jun 2024)