Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Green's Function Comparison Method

Updated 5 January 2026
  • Green's Function Comparison Method is a technique for comparing pluricomplex Green functions on matrix domains using holomorphic symmetrization.
  • It establishes equality for cyclic matrices and strict inequality for derogatory ones through a rigorous analysis of nilpotence and Jordan decomposition.
  • The method integrates pluripotential theory with spectral analysis to differentiate classical invariants like the Carathéodory distance and Green function in higher dimensions.

The Green's function comparison method is a technique for relating the pluricomplex Green functions on two distinct domains linked via a holomorphic mapping, with a particular focus on the spectral ball Ωspec\Omega_{\rm spec} and the symmetrized polydisk GnG_n in several complex variables. Core results establish precise inequalities and characterizations for the Green functions on these domains, especially highlighting the distinction between cyclic (non-derogatory) and derogatory matrices and the role of nilpotence in the behavior of these functions. The method is rigorously developed in Thomas–Trao–Zwonek, "Green functions of the spectral ball and symmetrized polydisk" (Thomas et al., 2010).

1. Spectral Ball, Symmetrized Polydisk, and Symmetrization Map

Let MnM_n denote the space of n×nn \times n complex matrices. The spectral ball is defined as

Ωspec={AMn:ρ(A)<1},\Omega_{\rm spec} = \{ A \in M_n : \rho(A) < 1 \},

where ρ(A)=max{λ:λsp(A)}\rho(A)=\max\{|\lambda|: \lambda \in\operatorname{sp}(A)\} is the spectral radius of AA.

Given the characteristic polynomial PA(t)=det(tIA)=tns1(A)tn1++(1)nsn(A)P_A(t)=\det(tI-A)=t^n - s_1(A) t^{n-1} + \cdots + (-1)^n s_n(A), the symmetrization map

π:ΩspecCn,π(A)=(s1(A),...,sn(A))\pi: \Omega_{\rm spec}\to\mathbb{C}^n, \qquad \pi(A) = (s_1(A),...,s_n(A))

maps AA to the vector of its elementary symmetric functions. The image Gn=π(Ωspec)CnG_n = \pi(\Omega_{\rm spec})\subset\mathbb{C}^n is called the symmetrized polydisk, which is a bounded, complete hyperbolic, and hyperconvex domain.

The pluricomplex Green function with pole at pDCmp\in D\subset\mathbb{C}^m is

gD(p,z)=sup{u(z):uPSH(D),u(w)logwp+O(1)},g_D(p,z) = \sup\{ u(z): u\in \operatorname{PSH}(D),\, u(w)\leq \log|w-p|+O(1) \},

with gΩ(A,B)g_\Omega(A,B) for D=ΩspecD=\Omega_{\rm spec} and gGn(z,w)g_{G_n}(z,w) for D=GnD=G_n (Thomas et al., 2010).

2. Main Comparison Theorem and Inequality

For any A,BΩspecA,B\in\Omega_{\rm spec}, the Green's function on the spectral ball dominates the pullback via symmetrization: gΩspec(A,B)gGn(π(A),π(B))\boxed{ g_{\Omega_{\rm spec}}(A,B) \geq g_{G_n}\big(\pi(A),\pi(B)\big) } If AA is cyclic (non-derogatory), i.e. it has a single Jordan block per eigenvalue, then equality holds for every BB: A cyclic    gΩ(A,B)=gGn(π(A),π(B))A\ \mathrm{cyclic} \implies g_{\Omega}(A,B) = g_{G_n}\big(\pi(A),\pi(B)\big) If AA is derogatory (it has a repeated eigenvalue and more than one Jordan block per eigenvalue), the inequality is always strict. The difference

Δ(A,B)=gΩ(A,B)gGn(π(A),π(B))\Delta(A,B) = g_\Omega(A,B) - g_{G_n}\big(\pi(A),\pi(B)\big)

is strictly positive and estimates for this gap depend on the orders of nilpotence in the Jordan decomposition of AA (Thomas et al., 2010).

3. Role of Derogatory Poles and Nilpotence

To formalize strictness, conjugate AA into Jordan form. For eigenvalue λ\lambda,

$n(\lambda) = \dim\ker(A-\lambda I),\quad m(\lambda) = \min\{k: (A-\lambda I)^k=0\, \text{on the %%%%21%%%%-block}\}$

AA is derogatory iff for some λ\lambda one has m(λ)<n(λ)m(\lambda)<n(\lambda).

For a nilpotent matrix VV, λ=0\lambda=0, n(0)=nn(0)=n, m(0)=mn1m(0)=m\leq n-1. For small perturbation V+XV+X,

logρ(V+X)1mlogX+O(1)    gΩ(V,V+X)mlogX+O(1)\log\rho(V+X)\leq \frac1m \log\|X\| + O(1) \implies g_{\Omega}(V,V+X)\geq m\log\|X\| + O(1)

Homogeneity of the elementary symmetric polynomials yields

gGn(π(V),π(V+X))nlogX+O(1)g_{G_n}(\pi(V),\pi(V+X))\leq n\log\|X\| + O(1)

Therefore,

Δ(V,V+X)(mn)logX+O(1)\Delta(V,V+X)\geq (m-n)\log\|X\|+O(1)

is strictly positive for small XX when m<nm<n.

For general derogatory AA with repeated eigenvalue λ0\lambda_0 and m(λ0)<n(λ0)m(\lambda_0)<n(\lambda_0), one applies a Möbius-type automorphism moving λ0\lambda_0 to $0$ and repeats the estimation with the same order distinction, confirming strict inequality (Thomas et al., 2010).

4. Isospectral Fibres, Cyclicity, and the Proof Strategy

The Green function gΩg_\Omega is constant along fibers of the symmetrization map: gΩ(A,B)=gΩ(A,B)wheneverπ(B)=π(B)g_\Omega(A,B) = g_\Omega(A,B') \quad \text{whenever}\quad \pi(B)=\pi(B') This invariance under the isospectral equivalence is central. The composition gGn(π(A),π())g_{G_n}(\pi(A),\pi(\cdot)) is plurisubharmonic on Ω\Omega, ensuring by the maximum property that it is always bounded above by gΩ(A,)g_\Omega(A,\cdot), yielding the main inequality.

For AA cyclic, the differential dπd\pi has maximal rank and π\pi is a submersion locally. A theorem of Jarnicki–Pflug shows that the pullback of the Green function along a submersion coincides with the Green function of the source, establishing equality for cyclic poles (Thomas et al., 2010).

In the derogatory case, one examines one-parameter families B(t)=A+tXB(t)=A+tX tangent to the isospectral fiber. The spectral radius of B(t)B(t) grows as t1/m(λ0)|t|^{1/m(\lambda_0)}, but under π(B(t))\pi(B(t)), the coordinate growth is t1/n(λ0)|t|^{1/n(\lambda_0)}, so the difference in exponents after taking logarithms underscores the strict gap between gΩg_{\Omega} and gGng_{G_n}.

5. Infinitesimal Estimates and Metric Separation in GnG_n

For domains DD, the following inequalities relate the (pseudo-)Carathéodory distance cDc_D, the Green function gDg_D, and the Lempert function D\ell_D: logcD(z,w)gD(z,w)logD(z,w)\log c_D(z,w) \leq g_D(z,w) \leq \log\ell_D(z,w) On the symmetrized polydisk, novel phenomena appear for n3n\geq3. At the origin 0Gn0\in G_n and in the “last coordinate” direction en1e_{n-1},

AGn(0;en1)YGn(0;en1)n1nA_{G_n}(0; e_{n-1})\geq Y_{G_n}(0; e_{n-1})\geq \frac{n-1}{n}

where YDY_D is the infinitesimal Azukawa metric and ADA_D the Carathéodory–Reiffen metric.

For n3n\geq3,

YGn(0;en1)<AGn(0;en1)Y_{G_n}(0;e_{n-1}) < A_{G_n}(0;e_{n-1})

Consequently, for small t|t|,

cGn(0,ten1)<exp(gGn(0,ten1))c_{G_n}(0,\, t\, e_{n-1}) < \exp\big(g_{G_n}(0,t\,e_{n-1})\big)

Thus, the Green function and Carathéodory distance exhibit marked differences for the symmetrized polydisk in dimensions above two. This contrasts with the classical equivalence in the bidisk or the unit ball (Thomas et al., 2010).

6. Significance and Mathematical Context

The Green's function comparison method rigorously quantifies the distinction between the spectral ball and its symmetrized image, particularly through pluripotential-theoretic invariants and their extremal properties on matrix domains. The method demonstrates the central role of cyclicity, nilpotence, and isospectral geometry in the pluricomplex Green function's behavior and exposes deeper structure in fundamental complex-analytic metrics, revealing, for higher dimensions, non-trivial separations between classical objects such as the Carathéodory distance and the pluricomplex Green function (Thomas et al., 2010).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)

Whiteboard

Topic to Video (Beta)

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Green's Function Comparison Method.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube