Green Function Comparison

• Green Function Comparison is a framework that defines and contrasts canonical solutions of PDEs to reveal spectral, geometric, and analytic differences across domains.
• It employs variational formulas, operator perturbation methods, and even AI-driven techniques to quantify discrepancies in both classical and nonlocal settings.
• Applications extend from complex matrices and stochastic homogenization to discrete networks and algebraic structures, offering actionable insights for theory and practice.

A Green function provides a canonical fundamental solution to a partial differential operator acting on a domain, encoding the influence of a localized source (typically a Dirac delta) on the entire space or manifold. Comparison of Green functions encompasses the quantitative and structural relationship between Green functions associated with different operators, domains, or parameter regimes. Recent advances have revealed a detailed taxonomy of such comparisons, spanning complex analysis, probability, spectral theory, stochastic homogenization, and mathematical physics, with connections to invariant metrics, singularities, and algebraic or geometric properties of the objects involved.

1. Comparison of Green Functions on the Spectral Ball and Symmetrized Polydisk

The domain known as the spectral ball is defined for $n \times n$ complex matrices $A$ with spectral radius $p(A) < 1$:

$\Omega_n = \{ A \in M_n : p(A) < 1 \}.$

The pluricomplex Green function on $\Omega_n$, denoted $g_{\Omega_n}$, and its counterpart on the symmetrized polydisk $G_n = o(\Omega_n)$ (where $o : M_n \to \mathbb{C}^n$ is the mapping via elementary symmetric polynomials) exhibit deep comparison features (Thomas et al., 2010). Specifically,

• $g_{\Omega_n}(V, M)$ is constant on isospectral varieties, i.e., the fibers $o^{-1}(o(M))$;
• For all $V, M$,

$g_{\Omega_n}(V, M) \geq g_{G_n}(o(V), o(M)),$

with equality if and only if $V$ is cyclic (non-derogatory);

• In derogatory cases (where $V$ has nontrivial Jordan blocks), the inequality is strict, with the discrepancy controlled by the order of nilpotence $m$ of the strict upper triangular part:

$$g_{\Omega_n}(V, V+X) \geq m \log \|X\| + O(1) > g_{G_n}(o(V), o(V+X)).$$

• Unlike many classical holomorphic invariants, $g_{\Omega_n}$ is not symmetric in its arguments.
• For $n \geq 3$, various invariant functions (Green function, Carathéodory distance, Azukawa metric) are distinct on $G_n$, explicitly demonstrated via directional estimates:

$Y_{G_n}(0; e_{n-1}) < A_{G_n}(0; e_{n-1}),$

and for the Green and Carathéodory distances,

$g_{G_n}(0, z) \neq c_{G_n}(0, z).$

Context and Significance:

This comparison delineates how the spectral structure of a matrix, notably cyclicity or the presence of nilpotence, directly determines the relationship between holomorphic invariants on matrix domains and their abelianized images. They clarify that for generic (cyclic) matrices, spectral-type Green functions reflect only the underlying spectrum, but as the spectral fiber becomes more complicated (derogatory), strictly inequivalent analytic behavior emerges.

2. Variational and Operator-Theoretic Comparison

Hadamard's variational formula quantifies the sensitivity of the Green function $g_D(z, w)$ to domain perturbations:

$$g^*(z, w) - g(z, w) = -\varepsilon \int_{\partial D} (\partial_n g)(z, \zeta) (\partial_n g)(w, \zeta) p(\zeta) ds(\zeta) + o(\varepsilon),$$

where $g^*$ is the Green function for the perturbed domain (Martin, 2011).

Operator perturbations are approached via Neumann series. For perturbing the Laplacian to (e.g.) the Helmholtz operator or Schrödinger operator,

• The perturbed Green function satisfies, at first order,

$g^* - g = a T g + o(a)$

(Helmholtz), or

$g^* - g = \varepsilon T P g + o(\varepsilon)$

(Schrödinger), where $T$ is an integral operator with the Green kernel, $P$ is multiplication by a potential, and higher-order terms expand as a controlled Neumann series.

For the Laplace–Beltrami operator, the variation is encoded by

$$g^*(z, w) - g(z, w) = \varepsilon \int_D p(\xi) \nabla g(z, \xi) \cdot \nabla g(\xi, w) dA(\xi) + o(\varepsilon).$$

Context and Significance:

This framework treats Green function comparison as a controlled expansion about a reference operator or domain, with first- and higher-order corrections capturing the precise operator or geometric deviation.

3. Probabilistic and Nonlocal Operator Perspective

Green function comparison results are robustly established for nonlocal generators, notably for fractional Laplacians and unimodal Lévy processes:

• For $L = \Delta^{\alpha/2} + b \cdot \nabla$ with $1 < \alpha < 2$ and $b$ in an appropriate Kato class, the Green function of $L$ is proven to be comparable to that of $\Delta^{\alpha/2}$ on smooth domains $D$:

$$c_1 G_D(x, y) \leq \widetilde{G}_D(x, y) \leq c_2 G_D(x, y),$$

uniformly for $x, y \in D$, provided $b$ is sufficiently "small" in Kato norm (Bogdan et al., 2010).

For symmetric unimodal Lévy processes of weak scaling order $>1$, the same type of comparability holds for gradient perturbations on $C^{1,1}$ domains in both $\mathbb{R}^d$ and $\mathbb{R}$ with drift $b$ in the appropriate Kato class (Grzywny et al., 2015, Grzywny et al., 2018). The expansion is essentially via a Duhamel-type formula,

$$G^C(x, y) = G(x, y) + \int_D G^C(x, z) b(z) \partial_z G(z, y) dz,$$

with convergence and comparability ensured if the Kato norm is small.

Context and Significance:

These results establish the remarkable stability of fine potential-theoretic properties of nonlocal operators under lower-order (gradient) perturbations, so long as the perturbation is subcritical with respect to the scaling dictated by the main operator.

4. Green Functions in Stochastic Homogenization and Discrete Settings

Random elliptic operators yield quenched Green functions $G(a; x, y)$ with statistical properties depending on the field $a(x)$. Under ergodicity and a suitable logarithmic Sobolev inequality (LSI), one can compare spatial decay rates of stochastic moments:

$$\left(\mathbb{E}\left|V V G(b, b')\right|^{2p}\right)^{1/2p} \lesssim (|b - b'| + 1)^{-d},$$

with identical decay as in the constant-coefficient case (Marahrens et al., 2013).

Context and Significance:

These results show, under strong mixing/ergodic conditions (LSI), the Green function’s statistical fluctuations at high moments decay algebraically at the same rate as deterministic operators, thereby ensuring optimal error estimates in stochastic homogenization and PDEs in random media.

5. Comparison of Classical and Pluricomplex Green Functions

In bounded $\mathcal{C}^2$-smooth locally $\mathbb{C}$-convexifiable domains $D$ of finite type in $\mathbb{C}^n$, sharp comparison results relate the classical (real) $G_D(z, w)$ and pluricomplex $g_D(z, w)$ Green functions (Nikolov et al., 2016):

• Pointwise ratio estimates for $z \neq w$:

$g_D(z, w)/G_D(z, w) < C |z - w|^{2(n-2m)},$

for domains of type $2m$.

• Lower bounds and two-sided estimates are provided near the boundary, with the precise asymptotic behavior encoded in the domain's complex geometry.

The paper further refines classical estimates for the Kobayashi distance and Lempert function, unifying them with Green function comparisons.

Context and Significance:

This shows that the complex-analytic and real potential-theoretic Green functions, though both fundamental, are quantitatively and qualitatively distinct in higher dimensions: their ratio captures the boundary type and the holomorphic geometry of the domain.

6. Nonlocal, Discrete, and Algebraic Settings

Comparison results have been established for Green functions of nonlocal operators avoiding classical heat kernel techniques (Kassmann et al., 2021). For fractional order $\alpha \in (0, 2)$,

$$c |x - y|^{-(d-\alpha)} \leq G(x, y) \leq C |x - y|^{-(d-\alpha)}$$

near the diagonal, with constants robust as $\alpha \to 2$, achieved by energy and variational techniques rather than direct use of the heat kernel.

In combinatorial settings, e.g., on finite networks with complex weights as in (Muranova et al., 2022), the Green function is defined analytically as

$G_P^\circ = (I_{V^\circ} - P^\circ)^{-1}$

for the restricted transition matrix $P^\circ$, and the comparison with reversible Markov chains is performed via power series and analytic continuation, accommodating complex-valued weights with positive real part on edges.

In algebraic topology, for an energized simplicial complex with ring-valued energy function $h$, the Green function $g$ and connection matrix $L$ are related via

$$g^* L = I, \qquad \det(L) = \det(g) = \prod_{x \in G} h(x),$$

with further quadratic and signed-sum identities for Wu characteristic and Euler characteristic (Knill, 2020).

Context and Significance:

These generalizations of Green function comparison principles extend classical potential theory to modern settings: nonlocal and fractional operators, random environments, combinatorial and topological structures, and complex-weighted networks.

7. AI-Driven and Symbolic Discovery Frameworks

Recent work applies symbolic regression, reinforcement learning, and neural approximations to discover (or approximate) Green functions for PDEs (Peng et al., 2023, Gu et al., 1 Aug 2024):

• The DISCOVER method constructs candidate Green function expressions as symbolic binary trees optimized with LSTM agents and physical hard constraints, such as self-adjoint symmetry $G(x, y) = G(y, x)$. This approach reproducibly discovers (to $10^{-10}$ accuracy) ground-truth Green functions for classical and non-classical operators, even when explicit forms are unknown. For the Laplace operator on $[0,1]$ with Dirichlet conditions,

$$G_{\text{exact}}(x, y) = \begin{cases} x(1 - y), & x \leq y \ y(1 - x), & x > y \end{cases}$$

is rediscovered to high fidelity.

• Deep Generalized Green's Functions (DGGF) leverage neural networks to approximate a generalized Green function by regularizing the Dirac delta into accessible terms, bypassing the singularity and allowing for mesh-free, memory-efficient solution construction.

Context and Significance:

These developments provide robust, interpretable, and data-driven means to find and compare Green functions, offering not only highly accurate surrogate kernels but also physical insight and reduction of analytical complexity in the construction and comparison of Green functions for increasingly complex operators and boundary conditions.

---

Conclusion:

Green function comparison frameworks expose deep connections between the geometry, algebra, and analysis underlying differential, integral, and difference operators. Whether comparing Green functions across matrix domains, verifying the robustness of stochastic and nonlocal analytic behavior, or constructing new representations via AI and symbolic regression, the central theme is the explicit quantification and control of the analytic differences and similarities induced by domain, operator, and boundary variations. These results underpin a range of consequences, from invariant metric distinction in several complex variables, through probabilistic homogenization, to AI-accelerated discovery of fundamental PDE kernels.