Future Lepton Colliders
- Future lepton colliders are high-precision accelerator facilities designed to explore the electroweak scale, Higgs sector, and physics beyond the Standard Model using clean event environments.
- These facilities include both linear and circular e⁺e⁻ machines as well as muon colliders, each optimized for specific energy ranges, luminosity targets, and experimental conditions.
- Advanced detector techniques and analysis methods, such as cutting-edge jet tagging and high-order QED corrections, enable sub-percent precision in key measurements.
Future lepton colliders are high-precision accelerator facilities designed to advance the understanding of electroweak scale physics, the Higgs sector, and to probe physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM) through both direct discovery and ultra-precise measurements. The technological and physics cases for these colliders are driven by their unique capacity for clean event environments, ultimate luminosity, exquisite control of systematics, and their ability to access new physics via both on-shell production and indirect virtual effects. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the main proposals, physics reach, methodological developments, and theoretical challenges associated with future lepton collider projects, including both electron-positron () and muon-muon () machines.
1. Proposed Facility Concepts and Machine Parameters
Future lepton colliders fall into two main categories: linear and circular colliders, and high-energy circular colliders. Each optimizes different aspects of energy reach, luminosity, and experimental environment (Craig, 2017, Jadach et al., 2019, Holmes et al., 2012).
| Collider | Energy Range (√s, GeV/TeV) | Peak Luminosity | Key Physics Programs |
|---|---|---|---|
| CEPC | 91, 160, 240–250 | cms | Z-pole, threshold, Higgs factory |
| FCC-ee | 91, 160, 240–365 | cms | Z, W, H, top precision |
| ILC | 250, 500, 1000 | cms | Higgs/WW/top, Beam polarization |
| CLIC | 380, 1500, 3000 | cms | Multi-TeV, Double Higgs |
| Muon Collider | 1500, 3000, 14000 | cms | Multi-TeV, Compact, Higgs s-channel |
Circular colliders (CEPC, FCC-ee) maximize luminosity at moderate energies ( GeV), enabling statistics-driven precision programs at the Z, W, and Higgs scales. Linear colliders (ILC, CLIC) reach higher energies for direct pair production of heavy states, large mass splitting sensitivity, and measurements such as double Higgs production. High-energy muon colliders enable multi-TeV collisions in a compact ring due to suppressed synchrotron radiation and beamstrahlung, extending direct and indirect reach into new physics up to and beyond 10 TeV (Holmes et al., 2012, Jadach et al., 2019).
2. Higgs and Electroweak Precision Physics
Future lepton colliders provide a transformative platform for Higgs and electroweak (EW) precision measurements. At machines, the Higgsstrahlung process () dominates at 240–250 GeV, enabling model-independent extraction of via the recoil-mass technique with sub-percent precision. WW-fusion, , , , and loop-induced decays , are measured with percent-level accuracy, constraining corresponding Higgs couplings ( framework) (Ge et al., 2016, Craig, 2017):
| Channel | CEPC 5 ab⁻¹ (1σ) |
|---|---|
| Invisible |
-pole (Tera-Z) and -threshold running deliver per-mille or better measurements of EW pseudo-observables: , , , , (Jadach et al., 2019). Such precision is crucial for global SM fits, oblique parameter constraints, and effective field theory (EFT) interpretations, with sensitivity to new physics scales up to 10–40 TeV, e.g., for dimension-6 operators , , and (Ge et al., 2016).
Muon colliders enable unique -channel Higgs production (), allowing direct measurement of at and couplings to . At higher energies ( TeV), tens of thousands of -fusion Higgs events allow extraction of , , and precision study of vector boson scattering (Holmes et al., 2012).
3. Direct and Indirect BSM Searches
3.1 Direct Production and Exotics
colliders are optimal for pair production of electroweak states—Higgsinos, winos, sleptons, inert scalars—down to compressed mass splittings (). Threshold scans enable precise mass and quantum number determination (Craig, 2017). Multi-lepton and high-multiplicity final states, characteristic of extended SU(2) multiplets or models with both scalar and fermionic BSM content, benefit from negligible QCD backgrounds and precise event reconstruction. For example, in models with a fermionic quintuplet and scalar quartet, high lepton and jet multiplicities (e.g., ) yield backgrounds suppressed by –, enabling discovery up to GeV at ILC and $1.4$–$4.5$ TeV at a muon collider (for $1$–$10$ ab) (Kumar, 2024).
Leptophilic WIMPs, neutral and doubly-charged scalar mediators, and charged lepton flavor violating channels can be accessed via direct searches and mono-photon/mono-Z signatures. Sensitivity to couplings explaining the muon anomaly, and LHC-blind co-annihilation 'blind spots', is achievable for mediator and WIMP masses up to 125–200 GeV at colliders and extended at muon colliders (Horigome et al., 2021, Dev et al., 2019).
3.2 Indirect Virtual Effects
Virtual effects from EWIMPs with masses above threshold ( up to TeV above) are accessible through and cross section distortions. Achieving systematic precision on these observables allows indirect probes of minimal dark matter, winos, Higgsinos, and higher-multiplet states, extending sensitivity out to 1.5 TeV (CLIC), and operator cut-off scales up to 10–30 TeV (Harigaya et al., 2015). EFT analysis of deviations in global fits constrains Wilson coefficients at scales competitive with hadron colliders, often exceeding direct reach for weakly coupled scenarios (Ge et al., 2016).
4. Advanced Detector and Analysis Techniques
Precision goals require advanced jet flavor tagging, photon/lepton identification, and control of systematics. For direct CKM element extraction from at the -threshold (e.g., FCC-ee at GeV, $12$ ab), exclusive hadronic branching ratios are measured via a 3D profile likelihood fit to tagger outputs (using , , and light jet taggers), with acceptance (Marzocca et al., 2024). Optimal working points for tagging efficiencies are:
| Tagger | -tag | -tag | -tag | Light jet rejection |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -tag | 0.80 | 0.003 | 0.0005 | |
| -tag | 0.02 | 0.80 | 0.008 | 0.01 |
| -tag | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.90 |
Ultimate precision is limited by statistics for (statistical floor ) and by -tag systematics for (systematic floor for on ). Orthogonal taggers and control of systematic uncertainties via calibration samples (e.g., Z bosons at FCC-ee), and inclusion of semileptonic channels, are required for per-mille-level control (Marzocca et al., 2024).
5. Theoretical and Simulation Challenges
The statistical power of future runs (e.g., Z, WW) necessitates Standard Model predictions to match experimental uncertainties at the level or better (Jadach et al., 2019). Key areas are:
- Soft and collinear QED corrections: All-orders YFS resummation of logarithms from initial- and final-state photon emission, implemented in SHERPA and other frameworks, provides O accuracy and sub-permille theoretical uncertainty, validated against KKMC and other reference tools (Krauss et al., 2022).
- Two-loop electroweak corrections: Required for , , and Higgs observables to match per-mille goals.
- Monte Carlo integration: Fully differential phase-space event generators must match experimental cuts and handle QED/EW corrections.
Systematics from luminosity measurement, vacuum polarization inputs, ISR/FSR interference, and beam energy spread must be controlled. Background subtraction (e.g., for near-threshold) must reach uncertainty (Jadach et al., 2019).
6. Long-Lived Particle and New Detector Opportunities
Future colliders offer unique capabilities for long-lived particle (LLP) searches due to nearly at-rest production of Z, Higgs, and new resonances. Far detectors, e.g., MATHUSLA-like (200%%%%115116%%%%200 m at m from the IP), provide a 4–6 gain in acceptance for LLP decays with in the $50$–$200$ m regime compared to near detectors. Such configurations extend sensitivity in exotic Higgs decays (), heavy neutral lepton (HNL) mixing ( for –$20$ GeV), and R-parity-violating neutralino decays ( GeV) (Wang et al., 2019).
7. Impact and Outlook
Future lepton colliders are poised to deliver unmatched precision in Higgs couplings, electroweak observables, and rare processes, enabling both direct and indirect BSM discovery. They offer sensitivity to vector portals (dark photons, ) down to coupling at FCC-ee for GeV, and out to multi-TeV at high-energy muon colliders (Airen et al., 2024). Tree-level CLFV processes driven by R-parity violation or new scalars are accessible in regions unreachable by low-energy or hadronic probes (Cai et al., 2024, Dev et al., 2019). These facilities provide a robust scientific case that is independent of LHC outcomes and ensure coverage of theoretically motivated scenarios from the EW to multi-TeV scale (Craig, 2017, Kumar, 2024).
The realization of such machines will require continued advances in accelerator design, detector technology, systematic control, and theoretical computations matching experimental statistical power. Upon completion, future lepton colliders will serve as both discovery and ultimate precision machines for particle physics at the intensity and energy frontiers.