Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Edge-Irregulators of Graphs

Updated 25 November 2025
  • Edge-irregulators of graphs are sets of edges whose deletion makes each connected pair of vertices have distinct degrees.
  • They serve as a measure of a graph’s distance from local irregularity with concrete bounds and exact values established for paths, cycles, and complete graphs.
  • Algorithmic studies show that determining optimal edge-irregulators is NP-complete and W[1]-hard, yet fixed-parameter algorithms exist under specific structural parameters.

An edge-irregulator of a graph is a set of edges whose deletion produces a locally irregular graph—that is, a graph in which every edge joins vertices of distinct degree. Edge-irregulators provide an extremal and algorithmic measure of a graph’s distance to local irregularity and underpin a family of combinatorial optimization problems with intricate complexity and structural features. These concepts connect to classical topics in irregularity measures, decomposition, edit distance to regular graphs, graph labelings, and spectral bounds.

1. Fundamental Definitions

Given a finite, simple, undirected graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E), GG is locally irregular if for every edge uvEuv\in E, dG(u)dG(v)d_G(u)\neq d_G(v). An edge-irregulator is a subset SE(G)S\subseteq E(G) such that the subgraph GSG-S is locally irregular. The minimal such SS defines the edge-irregulator number: e(G)=min{S:SE, GS is locally irregular}._e(G) = \min\{\,|S|\,:\, S \subseteq E,\ G-S\ \text{is locally irregular}\,\}. The computational problem, Optimal Edge-Irregulator, is:

  • Input: Graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) and integer kk.
  • Question: Does there exist SES\subseteq E with Sk|S|\leq k such that GSG-S is locally irregular? (Fioravantes et al., 2023)

Another central parameter is the function Ie(G)Ie(G), sometimes used interchangeably, measuring the minimum number of edges needing deletion for GG to become locally irregular (Bensmail et al., 18 Nov 2025).

2. Structural Properties and Extremal Bounds

Several structural bounds and extremal results have been established for Ie(G)Ie(G):

  • General Bound: For every connected graph GG with m=Em=|E|, it is conjectured that Ie(G)m/3+cIe(G)\leq m/3 + c for some absolute constant cc (the 1/3-conjecture), supported by constructions for paths, cycles, trees, and certain dense graphs (Bensmail et al., 18 Nov 2025).
  • Sharpness: The conjecture is tight up to the value of cc, as cycles of length $3k+2$ satisfy Ie(C3k+2)=m/3+1Ie(C_{3k+2}) = \lfloor m/3 \rfloor + 1.
  • Exact Values: For paths PnP_n, Ie(Pn)=(n1)/3Ie(P_n) = \lfloor (n-1)/3 \rfloor or (n1)/3\lceil (n-1)/3 \rceil. For complete graphs KnK_n with n=tk=k(k+1)/2n = t_k = k(k+1)/2, Ie(Kn)=E(Kn)mkIe(K_n) = |E(K_n)| - m_k where mk=k(k+1)(k1)(3k+2)/24m_k = k(k+1)(k-1)(3k+2)/24 is the maximal size of a locally irregular subgraph (Bensmail et al., 18 Nov 2025).

A tabular summary of established values is provided below.

Graph Family Ie(G)Ie(G) or Bound
Path PnP_n (n1)/3\lfloor (n-1)/3 \rfloor or (n1)/3\lceil (n-1)/3 \rceil
Cycle CnC_n Ie(Pn)+1Ie(P_n)+1
Complete bipartite 0 if nmn\neq m; nn if n=mn=m
Subdivision-2 of HH E(H)=m/3\geq |E(H)| = m/3
Tree (non-path) E/3\leq |E|/3
KnK_n (n=tkn=t_k) E(Kn)mk|E(K_n)| - m_k

These results exploit parity, degree multisets, and combinatorial constructions, indicating that local irregularity imposes strong structural constraints.

3. Algorithmic and Parameterized Complexity Results

The edge-irregulator problem exhibits a multiform complexity landscape (Fioravantes et al., 2023, Bensmail et al., 18 Nov 2025):

  • FPT (Fixed-Parameter Tractability):
    • Vertex Integrity, Cluster-Deletion Number, Neighborhood Diversity: There exist FPT algorithms parameterized by these quantities, using decomposition and Lenstra-style integer linear programming techniques. For vertex integrity kk, the problem can be solved in f(k)nO(1)f(k)n^{O(1)} time (Fioravantes et al., 2023).
    • Solution Size + Maximum Degree, Vertex Cover Number: For parameterization by k+Δk+\Delta, kernelization yields a bounded-size kernel, and for vertex cover number τ\tau, dynamic programming with O(2τ4nO(1))O(2^{\tau^4}n^{O(1)}) time is possible (Bensmail et al., 18 Nov 2025).
  • Hardness Results:
    • NP-completeness: The problem is NP-complete even for planar bipartite graphs of maximum degree 6.
    • W[1]-hardness: For parameterization by solution size kk, the feedback vertex set number, or treedepth (Fioravantes et al., 2023). This excludes efficient FPT algorithms for these parameters unless FPT=W[1]. As a consequence, no polynomial kernels are known.
  • Lower Bounds: A conflict-based lower bound holds: If ECE_C is the set of edges with d(u)=d(v)d(u)=d(v), then Ie(G)EC/(2Δ1)Ie(G)\geq |E_C|/(2\Delta-1) (Bensmail et al., 18 Nov 2025).
  • Algorithmic Table: (abbreviated for essential cases)

| Parameter | Edge-Irregulator Complexity | |------------------------------|-------------------------------------| | Solution size kk | W[1]-hard | | Feedback vertex set number | W[1]-hard | | Treedepth | W[1]-hard | | Vertex integrity | FPT (ILP-based) | | Cluster-deletion number | FPT (via integrity) | | Neighborhood diversity | FPT (small twin-classes) | | Planar + bipartite + Δ6\Delta\leq6 | NP-hard |

Edge-irregulators link to a broader set of irregularity concepts:

  • Total Edge Irregularity Strength: Given a labeling f:VE{1,,k}f:V\cup E\to\{1,\dots,k\}, the smallest kk such that all eEe\in E have distinct weights wtf(e)=f(e)+f(u)+f(v)wt_f(e)=f(e)+f(u)+f(v) is called the total edge irregularity strength, denoted tes(G)\mathrm{tes}(G) (Irwansyah et al., 2017, Pfender, 2010). For large graphs with bounded maximum degree, tes(G)=(m+2)/3\mathrm{tes}(G)=\lceil (m+2)/3\rceil.
  • Edit Distance to Regularity: The minimum number of edge edits (additions and deletions) to obtain a disjoint union of regular graphs is controlled, up to factorial in Δ\Delta, by the number i(G)i(G) of “separation vertices” (those adjacent to higher-degree neighbors) (Zeng, 2023).
  • Locally Irregular Edge-Colorings: Partitioning E(G)E(G) into color classes such that each induces a locally irregular subgraph, with the minimum number of colors being the irregular chromatic index χirr(G)\chi’_{irr}(G). For subcubic graphs, χirr(G)4\chi’_{irr}(G)\leq4, with many subclasses (e.g., claw-free, cycle permutation graphs) requiring 3\leq3 (Lužar et al., 2022).
  • Edge-Irregulators under Walk Constraints: Instead of edge deletions, one may allow edge-multisets forming walks whose addition turns GG into a locally irregular multigraph. The minimum length of such an irregularising walk, mlw(G)\mathsf{mlw}(G), has been studied with explicit bounds and exact values for families such as cycles, complete graphs, and trees (Bensmail et al., 26 Jun 2025).

5. Extremal Constructions, Proof Principles, and Kernelization Techniques

Key elements underlying both upper and lower bounds are:

  • Subdivisions and Conflicts: Subdividing edges increases the lower bound for Ie(G)Ie(G): if GG is obtained by subdividing every edge of HH twice, Ie(G)E(H)=E(G)/3Ie(G)\geq |E(H)|=|E(G)|/3 (Bensmail et al., 18 Nov 2025).
  • Integral LP Formulations: For FPT by vertex integrity, the problem reduces to an integer linear program with a parameter-dependent number of variables, executable via Lenstra’s algorithm (Fioravantes et al., 2023).
  • Branching and Distance-to-Conflict Arguments: For FPT by solution size plus maximum degree, kernelization relies on the fact that every edge in a solution lies within bounded distance of a “conflicting” edge (d(u)=d(v)d(u)=d(v)), allowing reduction to a small core (Bensmail et al., 18 Nov 2025).
  • Reduction Gadgets: Hardness results employ reductions starting from canonical kk-clique or general factor problems, using bipartite gadgets to encode instance-specific constraints (Fioravantes et al., 2023).

The edge-irregulator problem relates closely to classical edit and labeling parameters:

  • Regularizability: A graph is regularizable (via edge weight assignment) under different positivity constraints (arbitrary, non-negative, positive), and the minimal subgraphs that block regularizability (minimal "edge-irregulators" in this sense) coincide with certain unbalanced bipartite graphs or bridges (Franceschet et al., 2016).
  • Spectral Irregularity Measures: The total irregularity I(G)=eEd(u)d(v)I(G)=\sum_{e\in E}|d(u)-d(v)| is bounded by Laplacian spectral data: I(G)m(nZG4m2)λmax/nI(G)\leq\sqrt{m(nZ_G-4m^2)\lambda_{max}/n}, linking combinatorial and spectral approaches (Goldberg, 2013).

7. Open Problems, Conjectures, and Future Directions

Principal conjectures include:

  • 1/3-Conjecture: Ie(G)m/3+cIe(G)\leq m/3 + c for all connected GG with some absolute cc (Bensmail et al., 18 Nov 2025).
  • Complexity of FPT by Solution Size: It remains open whether the problem can be solved in FPT time with respect to solution size alone, as current lower bounds suggest otherwise.
  • Edit Distance Tightness: Determining whether the upper bound on edit distance to a union of regular graphs, governed by separation-vertex count i(G)i(G), is tight for all bounded-degree graphs (Zeng, 2023).
  • Irregular Chromatic Index: Whether χirr(G)3\chi’_{irr}(G)\leq3 for all decomposable graphs, except for a single cactus graph, is an open conjecture (Lužar et al., 2022).

These open directions demonstrate that edge-irregulators remain a central focus in the fine-grained analysis of local irregularity, graph labelings, and structural edit problems, with deep algorithmic, extremal, and spectral interconnections across contemporary graph theory.

Slide Deck Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Whiteboard

Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Edge-Irregulators of Graphs.