Easy-Plane XXZ Quantum Ferromagnetism
- Easy-plane XXZ quantum ferromagnetism is defined by anisotropic exchange interactions that favor in-plane (xy) spin alignment and induce U(1) symmetry breaking.
- The model’s Hamiltonian incorporates tunable anisotropy via exchange (Jxy and Jz) and single-ion terms, leading to diverse phases including TLL, dimerized, and symmetry-protected topological states.
- Experimental realizations in materials like monolayer CrCl₃ validate theoretical predictions through observable KT transitions, vortex dynamics, and scalable spin squeezing useful for quantum metrology.
Easy-plane XXZ quantum ferromagnetism encompasses a broad class of low-dimensional quantum spin models characterized by anisotropic exchange interactions that favor spin alignment within a specific plane—typically the -plane—over the out-of-plane () direction. Realizations span one- and two-dimensional systems with tunable anisotropy ratios, manifesting a range of collective quantum phenomena, including quantum phase transitions, Kosterlitz-Thouless (KT) topological order, nontrivial entanglement, and the emergence of both conventional and exotic spin textures.
1. Model Hamiltonians and Anisotropy Regimes
The canonical easy-plane XXZ Hamiltonian on a lattice of spin- moments is
where sets the in-plane (XY) ferromagnetic exchange, quantifies the Ising-type anisotropy, and introduces single-ion easy-plane anisotropy. The ratio or, equivalently, for generalized XXZ models, defines the easy-plane regime as (Sarıyer, 2018, Block et al., 2023).
Variants include frustrated chains with next-nearest-neighbor (NNN) exchange (Furukawa et al., 2010), honeycomb models with multi-neighbor couplings (Gu et al., 2023), and bond-operator representations for models with single-ion anisotropy (Carvalho et al., 2015). Easy-plane anisotropy arises both via exchange () and through single-ion (), the latter being especially relevant in actual 2D van der Waals magnets such as CrCl (Bedoya-Pinto et al., 2020).
2. Ground State Order, Excitations, and Quantum Criticality
For quantum spins in the easy-plane regime, the classical ground state is ferromagnetic within the plane, breaking a continuous symmetry (Block et al., 2023). At , quantum fluctuations do not destroy this order. The low-energy excitation spectrum is dominated by gapless in-plane Goldstone spin waves with linear dispersion , where is the spin-wave velocity (Sarıyer, 2018, Block et al., 2023).
In strictly one-dimensional systems, the inclusion of frustration (e.g., ferromagnetic NN and antiferromagnetic NNN ) produces a rich phase diagram. For the spin-½ chain
the ground state evolves through Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid (TLL), Neel, and dimerized phases as and are tuned (Furukawa et al., 2010, Ueda et al., 2020). The dimerized phases in the easy-plane regime can be symmetry-protected topological (SPT) and exhibit string order (Ueda et al., 2020).
In two dimensions, true long-range order at finite is forbidden by the Mermin-Wagner theorem for strictly short-range couplings. However, algebraically ordered Kosterlitz-Thouless (KT or BKT) phases occur for (Sarıyer, 2018, Bedoya-Pinto et al., 2020). The KT transition temperature vanishes logarithmically as : (Sarıyer, 2018).
3. Topological and Finite-Size Effects: KT/BKT Transitions and Vortex Physics
In the KT phase, the relevant physics is governed by binding/unbinding of topological vortex-antivortex pairs in the in-plane spin angle field . The effective continuum action is (Bedoya-Pinto et al., 2020): where is the spin stiffness. At , vortex pairs are bound, and correlations decay algebraically; above, they unbind, destroying phase coherence and leading to exponential decay.
Experimental realization in a monolayer CrCl shows remanent magnetization with , matching the 2D-XY value , and susceptibility exponent , consistent with 2D-XY values (Bedoya-Pinto et al., 2020). Finite grain size and substrate coupling round the phase transition, and magnetization scaling collapses as (system size) or temperature vary.
4. Quantum Effects: Entanglement, Spin Squeezing, and Symmetry Protection
Easy-plane XXZ ferromagnets exhibit nontrivial quantum entanglement, measurable through concurrence, entanglement of formation, and quantum discord built from nearest-neighbor correlations (Sarıyer, 2018). Finite values persist at low for , vanishing in the fully polarized Ising regime.
A salient attribute is their ability to support scalable spin squeezing at finite temperature for quantum-enhanced metrology (Block et al., 2023). The presence of U(1) symmetry breaking below leads to macroscopic quantum Fisher information (Heisenberg scaling). The phase diagram has a sharp transition between scalable and non-scalable squeezing, matching the equilibrium XY ordering boundary. The optimal squeezing parameter scales as —intermediate between standard quantum limit and all-to-all one-axis twisting scaling.
In one dimension, SPT transitions between dimerized phases map onto effective spin-1 chains with Haldane string order, protected by time-reversal, bond inversion, and symmetries (Ueda et al., 2020).
5. Frustration, Higher-Order Couplings, and Emergent Phases
Frustration, through competing (or ) terms or bond alternation, generates a sequence of phases and critical points not present in unfrustrated models. For the frustrated XXZ chain, as , alternate Neel and dimer ordered lobes accumulate, stabilized in the quantum case by emergent trimer correlations (three-spin bound states) rather than classical spin patterns (Furukawa et al., 2010).
In higher dimensions, stability of unconventional ground states such as multi- (double- or triple-) textures in honeycomb cobaltates requires higher-order (ring- or biquadratic) couplings in addition to the easy-plane XXZ terms (Gu et al., 2023). These interactions stabilize noncollinear in-plane magnetic structures resilient to symmetry reduction and yield strong quantum reduction of ordered moments (up to 40%).
Bond-operator mean-field theory for cubic models with easy-plane single-ion anisotropy maps out second- and first-order quantum phase transitions between ferromagnetic, collinear antiferromagnetic, and disordered (spin-liquid) regions: the latter can be realized without single-ion anisotropy, solely from frustrated exchange (Carvalho et al., 2015).
6. Experimental Realizations and Prospective Applications
Monolayer CrCl epitaxially deposited on graphene provides a prime example of a large-area, nearly ideal easy-plane XXZ ferromagnet (Bedoya-Pinto et al., 2020). Key parameters are meV, , and single-ion anisotropy meV per Cr, producing a spin gap meV for out-of-plane fluctuations. DFT and cluster models confirm the dominance of single-ion anisotropy over exchange anisotropy.
The system demonstrates observable 2D-XY scaling, a rounded BKT transition, and robustness to finite size, supporting avenues for atomistic meron/half-vortex imaging and superfluid spin transport.
In the context of quantum information and metrology, easy-plane XXZ models provide a generic Hamiltonian class enabling scalable spin squeezing by virtue of U(1) symmetry breaking at finite and associated enhanced quantum Fisher information (Block et al., 2023). This constrains the design of metrologically useful states and excludes short-range two-axis twisting models from yielding scalable gain.
7. Summary Table: Key Regimes and Physical Characteristics
| Regime / Model | Order at | Critical Behavior (2D) | Notable Excitations / Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2D easy-plane XXZ () | In-plane FM, KT phase | KT transition, BKT scaling | Goldstone modes, vortex/antivortex |
| 1D frustrated chain () | TLL, Neel, dimer phases | Gaussian/cascade of critical lines | Emergent trimers, SPT transitions |
| S=1 cubic w/ easy-plane () | FM, CAF, SL regions | 2nd/1st order quantum lines | Gapped/disordered phases, spin liquid |
| Honeycomb multi-q (XXZ + 4th order) | Double-q in-plane order | Multi-q stability | Strong quantum reduction, noncollinear |
These entries catalogue the principal phases, phase transitions, and emergent physics as dictated by the easy-plane XXZ quantum ferromagnetism paradigm in contemporary theoretical and experimental settings (Bedoya-Pinto et al., 2020, Sarıyer, 2018, Block et al., 2023, Furukawa et al., 2010, Carvalho et al., 2015, Gu et al., 2023, Ueda et al., 2020).