ArXiv Agent Overview

• ArXiv Agent is an autonomous system that ingests, indexes, retrieves, and analyzes scholarly literature to automate research workflows.
• It integrates LLMs, scientific knowledge graphs, and vector stores to enable hybrid search, precise citation analysis, and domain-specific query adaptation.
• Advanced retrieval methods like GraphRAG and VectorRAG combine sparse and dense ranking to improve context recall, precision, and answer faithfulness.

An ArXiv Agent is an autonomous or semi-autonomous software system designed to ingest, index, retrieve, analyze, and generate outputs from arXiv and related scholarly literature repositories. Leveraging advances in agentic artificial intelligence and retrieval augmented generation (RAG), these agents orchestrate multiple capabilities—including graph-based and vector-based search, instruction-tuned text generation, uncertainty quantification, and often multi-agent collaboration—to automate or accelerate workflows in scientific literature review, citation analysis, parameter extraction, and beyond. Recent architectures tightly integrate LLMs, scientific knowledge graphs (KGs), and dense vector stores (VS), enabling scalable, transparent, and domain-adaptable solutions for literature-centric research tasks (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025, Zhang et al., 11 Jul 2025, Grosskopf et al., 27 Jun 2025, Schmidgall et al., 23 Mar 2025, Springstein et al., 2018).

1. System Architectures and Core Components

Modern ArXiv Agents are characterized by multi-layered pipelines that combine structured metadata ingestion, heterogeneous retrieval, LLM-based reasoning, and rigorous evaluation. A representative high-level architecture comprises:

• Ingestion Layer: Harvests metadata and full-text PDFs from arXiv (and optionally PubMed, Google Scholar) via public APIs. Extracted metadata commonly includes DOI, title, abstract, authors, publication date, PDF URL, and subject categories (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025, Springstein et al., 2018).
• Knowledge Graph (KG) Service: Constructs a citation and metadata graph (often in Neo4j) with entities such as Paper, Author, Keyword, and SubjectCategory, linked via relationships (e.g., AUTHORED_BY, CITES) (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025).
• Vector Store (VS) Service: Indexes full-text embeddings (e.g., all-MiniLM-L6-v2, SciBERT, SPECTER) in a FAISS or similar vector database, with chunking and overlap strategies for context granularity (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025).
• Retrieval and Tooling Agents: Autonomous agent controllers (e.g., Llama-3.3-70B) select among retrieval modes. GraphRAG translates natural language to Cypher for KG querying; VectorRAG combines BM25 (sparse) and L2 (dense) retrieval, with ensemble re-ranking (e.g., Cohere cross-attention) (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025).
• Generation Module: Instruction-tuned LLM (e.g., Mistral-7B-Instruct, fine-tuned with Direct Preference Optimization—DPO) generates grounded answers, maximizing faithfulness to retrieved context (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025).
• Evaluation and Monitoring: Bootstrapped metrics with confidence intervals quantify answer faithfulness, relevance, precision, and recall, enabling robust monitoring (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025).

Competing or complementary systems, such as those in URSA and SimAgents, incorporate additional modules for planning, execution, parameter validation, and scientific code generation, often supported by auxiliary agents (Execution, Research, Hypothesizer, Analysis Writer) (Grosskopf et al., 27 Jun 2025, Zhang et al., 11 Jul 2025).

2. Data Ingestion, Preprocessing, and KG Construction

Efficient ingestion is foundational for any ArXiv Agent. The predominant pipeline involves:

• Metadata Harvesting: Fetches via arXiv HTTP API or OAI-PMH. Merges with cross-referenced records from PubMed or Google Scholar where available, deduplicating by DOI or title (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025, Springstein et al., 2018).
• Full-text Extraction and Chunking: Splits PDFs into chunks (e.g., 2,024 characters, 50-char overlap), aligning chunk size to embedding model capacities (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025).
• Knowledge Graph Schema: Defines nodes (Paper, Author, Keyword, Year, SubjectCategory) and relationships. Cypher querying supports subgraph retrieval, such as citation networks:

  MATCH (p:Paper)-[:CITES]->(cited:Paper) WHERE p.id = "arXiv:xxxx.xxxxx" RETURN cited.title

  (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025)
• Specialization: For focused ArXiv agents, schema extensions include additional nodes for subject categories, endorsement tags, versioning, and reference handling (figures, tables) (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025).
• Scalability and Updates: TIB-arXiv reports handling ≈1.3 million records, with nightly updates, Elasticsearch-based indexing, and performance optimizations through sharding, replication, and stateless REST APIs (Springstein et al., 2018).

3. Retrieval Methods: GraphRAG, VectorRAG, and Hybrid Re-ranking

Retrieval in modern ArXiv Agents is hybrid and query-adaptive:

• GraphRAG: LLM (e.g., Llama-3.3-70B) translates NL queries to Cypher to operate over KG, returning subgraph matches without explicit ranking; suited for structural or citation-centric queries (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025).
• VectorRAG: Employs an ensemble of sparse (BM25) and dense (L2 on embeddings) ranking:

$$\mathrm{BM25}(C,Q) = \sum_{w \in Q} \mathrm{IDF}(w) \cdot \frac{f(w,C)(k_1+1)}{f(w,C)+k_1(1-b + b\,\frac{|C|}{\mathit{avgdl}})}$$

$$L2(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{y}) = \sqrt{\sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - y_i)^2}$$

Top passages from both are re-ranked via Cohere's deep cross-attention. Combined scoring weights lexical and semantic signals without a closed-form; final context chunks are selected for answer generation (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025).

• Multi-modal and Feature-Augmented Retrieval: Extensions include LaTeX-figure OCR, table parsing, and enrichment of KG nodes with citation counts, Altmetric data, and download statistics as retrieval signals (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025).

4. Instruction-Tuned Generation and Hallucination Mitigation

Instruction-tuned LLMs underpin answer generation:

• DPO Fine-tuning: Mistral-7B-Instruct is fine-tuned with preference pairs $(x, y^+, y^-)$ reflecting context-grounded vs. hallucinated outputs:

$$\mathcal{L}_\mathrm{DPO} = -\,\mathbb{E}_{(x, y^+, y^-)} \log\sigma\left[\beta\left(\log p_\theta(y^+\,|\,x) -\log p_\theta(y^-\,|\,x)\right)\right]$$

The objective increases probability on preferred, context-based completions, empirically reducing hallucinations and improving answer faithfulness (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025).

• Generation Adaptivity: Agent controller adapts generation strategy to real-time research needs, with prompt engineering optimizing tool selection and specialization (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025).

5. Uncertainty Quantification and Evaluation Metrics

Robust evaluation and uncertainty monitoring are integral:

• Bootstrap Resampling: Metrics (context recall, precision, faithfulness, relevance) are computed over 12 resampled batches of 20 questions each, yielding mean $\bar{m}$ and standard deviation $s$ (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025).
• Confidence Intervals: Margin of error

$$\mathrm{ME} = t_{\alpha/2,\,df}\,\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}\ ; \quad \mathrm{CI} = \bar{m} \pm \mathrm{ME}$$

is reported for key performance indicators. CI width > 0.1 flags low-confidence answers, enabling downstream pipelines or user interfaces to alert or defer decisions (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025).

• Core Metrics:
  • Faithfulness ($F$): $\frac{|V|}{|S|}$ (statements supported by context)
  • Answer Relevance (AR): mean cosine similarity between generated and question embeddings
  • Context Precision/Recall (CP/CR): $\mathrm{Precision@k}$ and coverage of ground-truth statements in retrieved context (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025).
• Reported Gains: Relative to non-agentic pipelines, ArXiv Agent yields substantial improvements: VS Context Recall (+0.63), Overall Context Precision (+0.56), VS Faithfulness (+0.24), and incremental gains in other subcategories (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025).

6. Applicability, Customization, and Extension Points

ArXiv Agents can be highly specialized:

• ArXiv-Focused Instances: Ingestion restricted to arXiv OAI-PMH or RSS; enriched with subject category hierarchies, endorsement, versioning, and enhanced schema for domain-specific queries (e.g., “Which cs.LG papers cite both A and B?”) (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025).
• Embedding Choices: SciBERT and SPECTER are recommended for scientific text fidelity (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025).
• Retrieval and Evaluation Extensions:
  • Additional signals (citation and download metrics, Altmetric scores) as KG attributes or re-ranking features.
  • Customized KG schemas integrating grant/project/institution knowledge.
  • Instruction tuning on domain-specific QA pairs or for RLHF loops (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025).
• Deployment: Containerization (Docker) enables reproducibility; interactive interfaces can provide provenance (KG subgraph + ranked context passages), and uncertainty estimates (Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025).

7. Broader Ecosystem and Comparative Systems

ArXiv Agents are part of a wider ecosystem of scientific agentic architectures:

• URSA: Modular agent pipelines (Planning, Research, Hypothesizer, Execution, ArXiv) combine LLM reasoning, tool invocation, and literature summarization. The ArXiv Agent unit queries, loads, and summarizes PDFs with text and figure extraction, outputting LaTeX-formatted reviews (Grosskopf et al., 27 Jun 2025).
• Collaborative AgentRxiv: Emphasizes multi-agent laboratory sharing, literature report upload/retrieval via a RESTful preprint server, and embedding-based recommendation. Collaborative labs improve benchmarking accuracy by 13.7% over isolated configurations on MATH-500, with domain and model-level gains (Schmidgall et al., 23 Mar 2025).
• SimAgents: Addresses physics literature-to-simulation pipelines via multi-agent parameter extraction and validation from arXiv papers, automating configuration for cosmological codes and achieving higher fidelity (Micro-F1 ≈98.7%) vs. baselines (Zhang et al., 11 Jul 2025).
• TIB-arXiv: Pre-agentic but foundational in large-scale metadata/PDF ingest, open-source full-text + metadata indexing (Elasticsearch), user-level ranking (date, tweet, collection, relevance via BM25), and faceted web interfaces (Springstein et al., 2018).

These frameworks reflect an ongoing trajectory towards autonomous, context-aware agents that tightly integrate with the scientific publishing infrastructure and enable new modalities of computationally-aided discovery.

---

References:

(Nagori et al., 30 Jul 2025, Zhang et al., 11 Jul 2025, Grosskopf et al., 27 Jun 2025, Schmidgall et al., 23 Mar 2025, Springstein et al., 2018)