Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

MultiTable: A Faster Hash Table at any Physical Load Factor up to and Including One

Published 30 Sep 2026 in cs.CR, cs.DS, math.CO, and math.PR | (2609.39233v1)

Abstract: We present \emph{multitable} and its Rust reference implementation: a stable hash table both materially faster at equal physical memory and more flexible than the SwissTable in its Rust's hashbrown implementation. As an arithmetic mean over 84 configurations it delivers 2.1×\mathbf{2.1\times} hashbrown's throughput when both hash the same raw bytes and 1.9×\mathbf{1.9\times} when hashbrown is keyed on native integers, its best case; on negative lookups alone, 3.2×3.2\times and 2.9×2.9\times. Multitable reaches \textbf{any physical load factor} up to and \textbf{including one} ($0.9999$ demonstrated), exactly for the requested capacity, compared to hashbrown which doubles at $0.777$ for 4-byte keys and values. At 75%75\% saturation of hashbrown (assumed average case of its rigid ladder) and multitable sized to $0.97$ physical load factor, hashbrown takes 66%66\% more space. The lookup probe count has no cliff as the load factor approaches one. Bucket size, physical load factor, and failure budget are parameters, and the multitable can be grown without rehashing. We implement two variants of multitable: plain and filtered. At equal physical memory on an Apple M2 Pro the filtered multitable leads hashbrown in all $84$ insert, hit, and miss configurations. Multitable is more \textbf{memory-efficient}, at equal mixed-lookup throughput on the map of $4$-byte keys and values the filtered multitable needs up to 12%12\% fewer bytes than hashbrown, and the plain multitable is 18%18\% smaller, holding 22%\mathbf{22\%} more keys in the same memory.

Authors (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 26 likes about this paper.