Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Global solutions to an initial-boundary value problem for a model of convection driven by surface tension

Published 18 Aug 2026 in math.AP | (2608.17385v1)

Abstract: This paper establishes the global existence of non-negative weak solutions to a two-dimensional, fourth-order nonlinear degenerate parabolic equation modeling surface-tension-driven convection in thin fluid films. First, we construct a regularized approximate problem and prove its solvability via the Galerkin method. Utilizing energy and entropy functionals alongside a singular entropy condition 1/h0L<sup>1(Ω)1/h_0 \in L<sup>1(Ω), we secure uniform a priori bounds for higher-order spatial and time derivatives. These bounds enable the use of the Aubin-Lions lemma and Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequalities to achieve strong compactness and essential L<sup>6L<sup>6-integrability. Furthermore, we adopt the Alber-Zhu framework to rigorously define higher-order local weak derivatives and pass to the limit. Finally, we prove the limit function is non-negative, confirming it as a global weak solution to the original problem.

Authors (2)

Summary

  • The paper establishes global weak solutions for the two-dimensional Davis equation under no-flux boundaries when h₀ ∈ H¹(Ω), h₀ ≥ 0, and 1/h₀ ∈ L¹(Ω).
  • The authors combine κ-regularization, Galerkin approximation, energy and singular entropy estimates, and Aubin–Lions compactness to control the degenerate fourth-order flux and pass to the limit.
  • The resulting solution remains positive almost everywhere with a uniform reciprocal L¹ bound, while uniqueness, positive lower bounds, rupture, and waiting-time behavior remain unresolved.

The model and the main result

The paper studies the two-dimensional initial-boundary value problem for the thin-film evolution equation derived by Davis via long-wave asymptotics of the Navier–Stokes system coupled with heat transfer:

ht=(α1h3Δhα2h3h+α3h2h),h_t = -\nabla\cdot\left(\alpha_1 h^3\nabla\Delta h - \alpha_2 h^3\nabla h + \alpha_3 h^2\nabla h\right),

on a bounded smooth domain ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^2, with no-flux boundary conditions and initial data h0h_0. Here α1=1/(3Ca)\alpha_1 = 1/(3Ca), α2=Ga/3\alpha_2 = Ga/3, and α3=Ma/2\alpha_3 = Ma/2 encode capillary, gravitational, and Marangoni effects. The equation is a fourth-order degenerate parabolic PDE: the principal mobility h3h^3 vanishes at h=0h=0, and no maximum principle is available. Prior existence theory covered either one-dimensional settings, the case without lower-order convection (ψ0\psi\equiv 0) in multi-dimensions (Dal Passo–Garcke–Grün; Grün; Bertsch et al.), or periodic/unbounded domains for power-law mobilities. The authors' own prior work established the one-dimensional analogue under no-flux conditions; the two-dimensional case on bounded domains with both second-order convective terms was open.

The main theorem asserts: if h0H1(Ω)h_0 \in H^1(\Omega), ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^20 a.e., and ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^21, then for every ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^22 there exists a global weak solution ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^23 satisfying

  • ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^24,
  • ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^25,
  • ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^26 for a.e. ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^27, for all ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^28,
  • ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^29 and h0h_00.

The solution concept uses the Alber–Zhu notion of local weak h0h_01-derivatives: since h0h_02 only slice-wise in time, the positivity set h0h_03 need not be open in space-time, so h0h_04 is defined as an h0h_05-th local weak derivative on h0h_06 via exhaustion by measurable subsets, and the degenerate flux h0h_07 enters the weak formulation integrated over h0h_08 only.

Regularized problem and Galerkin approximation

The degeneracy is removed by replacing h0h_09 with α1=1/(3Ca)\alpha_1 = 1/(3Ca)0, yielding a uniformly parabolic approximate problem. Galerkin approximations are built from Neumann eigenfunctions of the Laplacian; the resulting ODE system has locally Lipschitz right-hand side, so Picard–Lindelöf gives local classical solutions, extended globally by uniform-in-α1=1/(3Ca)\alpha_1 = 1/(3Ca)1 estimates: α1=1/(3Ca)\alpha_1 = 1/(3Ca)2 and α1=1/(3Ca)\alpha_1 = 1/(3Ca)3 bounds on α1=1/(3Ca)\alpha_1 = 1/(3Ca)4 and α1=1/(3Ca)\alpha_1 = 1/(3Ca)5, plus α1=1/(3Ca)\alpha_1 = 1/(3Ca)6 bounded in α1=1/(3Ca)\alpha_1 = 1/(3Ca)7. The Aubin–Lions compactness lemma (with α1=1/(3Ca)\alpha_1 = 1/(3Ca)8, α1=1/(3Ca)\alpha_1 = 1/(3Ca)9) yields strong convergence in α2=Ga/3\alpha_2 = Ga/30 and in α2=Ga/3\alpha_2 = Ga/31; a Gagliardo–Nirenberg interpolation then upgrades this to strong convergence in α2=Ga/3\alpha_2 = Ga/32 — precisely the integrability needed to pass to the limit in the cubic and quadratic convective terms via Hölder pairing. Weak-strong convergence arguments identify all flux limits, giving a global weak solution to the regularized problem for each fixed α2=Ga/3\alpha_2 = Ga/33.

Uniform a priori estimates

Three independent-of-α2=Ga/3\alpha_2 = Ga/34 estimates form the core of the paper:

Energy estimate. The functional α2=Ga/3\alpha_2 = Ga/35, with α2=Ga/3\alpha_2 = Ga/36 containing a shifted logarithmic term, dissipates monotonically along solutions; completing the square shows the dissipation controls α2=Ga/3\alpha_2 = Ga/37. Coercivity of α2=Ga/3\alpha_2 = Ga/38 (via the inequality α2=Ga/3\alpha_2 = Ga/39) yields the uniform bound α3=Ma/2\alpha_3 = Ma/20.

Entropy estimate. Testing against α3=Ma/2\alpha_3 = Ma/21, where α3=Ma/2\alpha_3 = Ma/22, produces the strictly convex entropy α3=Ma/2\alpha_3 = Ma/23 converging as α3=Ma/2\alpha_3 = Ma/24 to α3=Ma/2\alpha_3 = Ma/25 for α3=Ma/2\alpha_3 = Ma/26 and α3=Ma/2\alpha_3 = Ma/27 for α3=Ma/2\alpha_3 = Ma/28. The Marangoni term contributes α3=Ma/2\alpha_3 = Ma/29 on the right-hand side; this is absorbed because h3h^30 grows logarithmically while h3h^31 grows like h3h^32, so h3h^33. Gronwall's lemma then gives uniform bounds on h3h^34 and on h3h^35, hence h3h^36. This entropy control is what enforces positivity in the limit; it depends essentially on the assumption h3h^37, which guarantees h3h^38.

Time-derivative estimate. Combining the above with Gagliardo–Nirenberg bounds on h3h^39 gives h=0h=00, closing the Aubin–Lions framework at the h=0h=01-level.

Passing to the limit and non-negativity

As h=0h=02, a subsequence converges strongly in h=0h=03 for any h=0h=04 (Aubin–Lions with h=0h=05, h=0h=06), strongly in h=0h=07, and consequently strongly in h=0h=08; the powers h=0h=09 converge strongly in the corresponding Lebesgue spaces.

Identification of the degenerate flux proceeds by domain decomposition. On exhausting sets ψ0\psi\equiv 00 constructed via Egorov's theorem, uniform convergence forces ψ0\psi\equiv 01, so the energy bound implies ψ0\psi\equiv 02 is bounded in ψ0\psi\equiv 03; a distributional argument using the Lebesgue differentiation theorem shows the weak limit equals ψ0\psi\equiv 04 slice-wise, and patching across ψ0\psi\equiv 05 yields the Alber–Zhu local derivative on ψ0\psi\equiv 06. On the singular set ψ0\psi\equiv 07, a Hölder estimate combined with strong ψ0\psi\equiv 08 convergence shows the ψ0\psi\equiv 09-norm of the flux on h0H1(Ω)h_0 \in H^1(\Omega)0 is at most h0H1(Ω)h_0 \in H^1(\Omega)1; letting h0H1(Ω)h_0 \in H^1(\Omega)2 proves the weak limit h0H1(Ω)h_0 \in H^1(\Omega)3 vanishes a.e. on h0H1(Ω)h_0 \in H^1(\Omega)4.

Positivity follows from a double Fatou argument rather than a contradiction argument (unavailable without a maximum principle). First, Fatou's lemma applied to h0H1(Ω)h_0 \in H^1(\Omega)5 at times of uniform convergence gives h0H1(Ω)h_0 \in H^1(\Omega)6; second, temporal continuity h0H1(Ω)h_0 \in H^1(\Omega)7 extends this to all h0H1(Ω)h_0 \in H^1(\Omega)8 via a second application of Fatou's lemma along approximating times. Since h0H1(Ω)h_0 \in H^1(\Omega)9 on ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^200, ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^201 a.e. for all ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^202, and ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^203 yields the uniform reciprocal bound ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^204. A consequence is that ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^205 has measure zero, so the local weak formulation over ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^206 coincides with a global one and the identification ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^207 holds throughout ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^208. The proof of the main theorem is completed by passing to the limit in the weak formulation term by term.

Limitations and open questions

The paper leaves uniqueness open: the regularity ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^209 is insufficient for ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^210-contraction or difference estimates on the degenerate operator ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^211. The condition ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^212 does not produce a positive lower bound for ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^213 — it yields only strict positivity a.e. together with the reciprocal ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^214 bound — so questions of waiting-time behavior, finite speed of propagation, and film rupture (touchdown at positive times) remain outside the scope of the existence result. Whether the entropy method extends to rougher initial data lacking ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^215 regularity, or to higher-order asymptotic models with additional terms, is not addressed.

Conclusion

The paper completes the program initiated in the authors' one-dimensional work by establishing global existence of non-negative weak solutions to the two-dimensional Davis equation under no-flux boundary conditions. The argument combines a ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^216-regularization with Galerkin approximation, energy and singular entropy estimates tied to the assumption ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^217, Aubin–Lions/Gagliardo–Nirenberg compactness delivering the critical ΩR2\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^218 integrability, the Alber–Zhu local derivative framework to handle the non-open degeneracy set, and a double Fatou argument replacing the missing maximum principle. The result provides the rigorous analytical foundation required to validate the Davis model's predictions of dry-spot formation and coarsening in surface-tension-driven convection.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.