where $1symmetric functions of this eigenvalue vector, extended polynomially in $1g=v−2gSn0 solutions below the threshold via gluing and conjectured g=v−2gSn1 as the necessary condition for general g=v−2gSn2; the paper establishes the non-strict version and shows the strict form is false in general.
The model algebra
A key reduction identifies g=v−2gSn3 with values of a Jacobi-type polynomial family g=v−2gSn4, g=v−2gSn5, defined by a three-term recurrence with positive subdiagonal coefficients g=v−2gSn6. Classical Jacobi-matrix theory gives real, simple, strictly interlacing zeros; if g=v−2gSn7 is the largest zero of g=v−2gSn8, then
g=v−2gSn9
and positivity of Sn∖Σ0 for all Sn∖Σ1 is equivalent to Sn∖Σ2. The supercritical regime Sn∖Σ3 then yields a quantitative cone separation: writing Sn∖Σ4 for the perturbed eigenvalue vector of an upper test and Sn∖Σ5, there exist Sn∖Σ6 and Sn∖Σ7 such that Sn∖Σ8 for every Sn∖Σ9. The proof uses cone monotonicity λ(g−1Ag)∈Γk+0 to exclude λ(g−1Ag)∈Γk+1 from the closed cone on λ(g−1Ag)∈Γk+2, and the estimate λ(g−1Ag)∈Γk+3 for λ(g−1Ag)∈Γk+4. This uniform negative margin is the quantitative input that drives the entire dimension argument.
Mechanism of the dimension bound
The proof of the main theorem combines four ingredients.
Scale-invariant gradient estimate. Chang–Han–Yang ball convexity gives λ(g−1Ag)∈Γk+5, where λ(g−1Ag)∈Γk+6; consequently λ(g−1Ag)∈Γk+7 is uniformly Lipschitz in the logarithmic variable λ(g−1Ag)∈Γk+8.
Fermi-coordinate upper-contact analysis. For upper tests of the form λ(g−1Ag)∈Γk+9, the matrix σk(g−1Ag)≡κ>00 admits an exact radial-block decomposition in which σk(g−1Ag)≡κ>01, with σk(g−1Ag)≡κ>02 independent of σk(g−1Ag)≡κ>03. Membership σk(g−1Ag)≡κ>04 forces σk(g−1Ag)≡κ>05. A combinatorial identity expresses σk(g−1Ag)≡κ>06 through σk(g−1Ag)≡κ>07 and Newton-tensor contractions σk(g−1Ag)≡κ>08; the supercritical cone separation then implies that every admissible upper test satisfies
σk(g−1Ag)≡κ>09
for uniform constants p≤pk(n)0.
One-dimensional propagation. A viscosity argument on the semiconvex peak functions p≤pk(n)1 (maxima of p≤pk(n)2 minus a quadratic tangential penalty over Fermi boxes) converts the test implication into a fixed increment p≤pk(n)3 per logarithmic time interval of length p≤pk(n)4: p≤pk(n)5.
Completeness contradiction. The connecting curves between successive maximizers have p≤pk(n)6-lengths bounded by p≤pk(n)7, hence summable, while the base points converge to a point of p≤pk(n)8 and p≤pk(n)9. The concatenated curve has finite pk(n)0-length, leaves every compact set of pk(n)1, and has no limit point in the punctured sphere—contradicting completeness. Therefore pk(n)2.
An important structural point is that the argument uses all the inequalities defining pk(n)3, not only the equation pk(n)4; the separation index pk(n)5 selected by the model algebra need not equal pk(n)6.
The equality examples (below) preclude a universal strict bound, but strictness is recovered under the hypothesis
pk(n)7
The proof first shows this condition is gauge-invariant under stereographic projection. Blowing up at a sequence approaching the contact ratio yields a half-relaxed limit pk(n)8 touched from above at a point by the linear test pk(n)9, whose Schouten eigenvalues are Hp+1×Sn−p−10 with multiplicities Hp+1×Sn−p−11 and Hp+1×Sn−p−12. Cone monotonicity and continuity of Hp+1×Sn−p−13 along the contact sequence give Hp+1×Sn−p−14 for Hp+1×Sn−p−15. Since the main theorem gives Hp+1×Sn−p−16, equality would force Hp+1×Sn−p−17, a contradiction. Hence Hp+1×Sn−p−18.
The quadratic case and equality examples
For Hp+1×Sn−p−19 the algebra simplifies: Σp⊂Sn00, so Σp⊂Sn01, and the two model functions Σp⊂Sn02 are explicit polynomials in Σp⊂Sn03. The separation constant Σp⊂Sn04 and the implication Σp⊂Sn05 are computed directly.
The critical dimension Σp⊂Sn06 is an integer precisely when Σp⊂Sn07 (Σp⊂Sn08), giving Σp⊂Sn09. The paper constructs, for every Σp⊂Sn10, a smooth complete conformal metric on Σp⊂Sn11 with Σp⊂Sn12 and Σp⊂Sn13. The construction is a cohomogeneity-one ODE analysis on the model Σp⊂Sn14 (with Σp⊂Sn15, Σp⊂Sn16), for which Σp⊂Sn17 and Σp⊂Sn18. Writing Σp⊂Sn19 with Σp⊂Sn20, Σp⊂Sn21, the constant-Σp⊂Sn22 equation becomes a first-order system with an exact remainder Σp⊂Sn23 vanishing to first order at the origin. A Volterra fixed-point argument in a weighted Banach space produces the local solution branching off the collapsed orbit with Σp⊂Sn24; smoothness across Σp⊂Sn25 follows from a regular-singular lemma for equations of the form Σp⊂Sn26 under the spectral condition Σp⊂Sn27. Global existence is obtained by supersolution comparison, and the asymptotics give
Σp⊂Sn28
where Σp⊂Sn29. The conformal factor behaves as Σp⊂Sn30, producing a complete logarithmic end. The smallest instance is a complete metric on Σp⊂Sn31; further examples occur at Σp⊂Sn32.
A concluding remark asserts that an analogous cohomogeneity-one construction yields equality at every integral model endpoint Σp⊂Sn33 for general Σp⊂Sn34, so the bound Σp⊂Sn35 is optimal and cannot in general be strengthened to Σp⊂Sn36. This claim is stated without proof in the paper; the detailed construction is carried out only for Σp⊂Sn37.
Limitations and open questions
Three qualifications are explicit in the paper. First, the strict inequality requires the finite positive linear-contact hypothesis; whether strictness holds under weaker asymptotic control is not addressed. Second, the equality construction at general integral endpoints Σp⊂Sn38 is asserted by analogy with the Σp⊂Sn39 case rather than proved. Third, the theorem covers only smooth embedded singular sets and the range Σp⊂Sn40; the behavior for non-smooth singular sets, or for Σp⊂Sn41, and whether the threshold Σp⊂Sn42 is attained at non-integral values by non-product examples, remain open.
Conclusion
The paper establishes the model-threshold dimension bound Σp⊂Sn43 for smooth singular sets of complete, admissible, constant positive Σp⊂Sn44-curvature conformal metrics on the sphere, improving González's Σp⊂Sn45 bound to the sharp product-model threshold, and proves its optimality at integral endpoints via explicit Σp⊂Sn46 equality metrics on Σp⊂Sn47. The conditional strict bound under finite linear contact delineates precisely where the non-strict form is unavoidable.