Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Pure braid groups are RFRS

Published 14 Aug 2026 in math.GR | (2608.13978v1)

Abstract: Agol in his 2014 ICM proceedings article \cite[Question 11]{Agol14} asks whether braid groups are (virtually) RFRS. We answer this positively by showing that pure braid groups are RFRS. As a consequence, several families of Artin groups are virtually RFRS, including those of type AnA_n (the braid groups), Bn=CnB_n=C_n, A~n\widetilde A_n, and C~n\widetilde C_n. Our results also provide evidence toward the problem of whether braid groups, and more generally Artin groups, are virtually special; see \cite[Problem 9.4]{HagWi10}, \cite[Problem 13.4]{Wise14}.

Authors (2)

Summary

  • The paper proves that every pure braid group PB_n is RFRS—and, more strongly, RFRp for every prime p—by combining partial towers, planar covers, and semidirect-product stability.
  • The proof repeatedly unwraps immersed curves through arc-cyclic covers of planar surfaces, reducing self-intersections and controlling boundary actions so group elements become homologically detectable.
  • The result extends to several Artin-group families, including types A, B=C, I_2, affine A, and affine C, providing evidence for virtual specialness while leaving the general conjecture open.

Overview

The paper proves that pure braid groups PBnPB_n are RFRSRFRS, answering a question posed by Agol in his 2014 ICM proceedings article, in the modified form suggested by Wu–Ye: while braid groups themselves cannot be RFRSRFRS (their commutator subgroups are finitely generated and perfect for n≥5n \geq 5, whereas RFRSRFRS groups are locally indicable), the pure braid groups satisfy the property outright. In fact, the stronger statement holds: PBnPB_n is RFRp\mathrm{RFR}p for every prime pp. As consequences, several families of Artin groups — types AnA_n, Bn=CnB_n = C_n, RFRSRFRS0, RFRSRFRS1, and RFRSRFRS2 — are virtually RFRSRFRS3, providing evidence toward the Haglund–Wise problem of whether all Artin groups are virtually special.

The proof strategy combines three ingredients: a detection criterion for RFRSRFRS4/RFRSRFRS5 via partial towers, a purely topological "unwrapping" theorem for curves on planar surfaces under arc-cyclic covers, and a boundary control argument ensuring compatibility of isotopical actions with such covers. These assemble into a semidirect-product stability result applied inductively along the Fadell–Neuwirth splitting RFRSRFRS6.

Partial towers as a detection mechanism

The authors work with the standard characterization of RFRSRFRS7: a finitely generated group RFRSRFRS8 is RFRSRFRS9 if and only if every nontrivial element is detected by a finite partial tower RFRSRFRS0 of finite-index normal subgroups with RFRSRFRS1, where detection means the element survives to RFRSRFRS2 with nonzero rational homology image. They extend this framework to Koberda–Suciu's RFRSRFRS3 variant, where quotients RFRSRFRS4 are elementary abelian RFRSRFRS5-groups. A subtlety they isolate is that the detection condition differs between the two settings: for RFRSRFRS6, an element is detected when it is excluded by an elementary abelian RFRSRFRS7-quotient (i.e., lies in RFRSRFRS8), not when it survives with nontrivial mod-RFRSRFRS9 homology. The example n≥5n \geq 50 with tower n≥5n \geq 51 shows that n≥5n \geq 52 survives rationally but is invisible to any elementary n≥5n \geq 53-quotient of n≥5n \geq 54. This distinction forces separate handling of the two cases throughout the paper.

Topologically, the n≥5n \geq 55 criterion translates into towers of n≥5n \geq 56-covers along which a given element lifts closed and ends up homologically nontrivial. Since surface groups embed in right-angled Artin groups, which are n≥5n \geq 57, arbitrary compact surfaces admit such towers; the contribution here is to realize them within the restricted class of arc-cyclic covers of planar surfaces.

Unwrapping curves on planar surfaces

The geometric core is a finite-cover unwrapping theorem. For a minimal immersed representative n≥5n \geq 58 of a nontrivial free homotopy class on a compact oriented planar surface, two elementary lemmas supply the setup: an innermost argument produces a simple essential self-intersection subloop n≥5n \geq 59, and essential simple closed curves on planar surfaces separate boundary components, so there is a properly embedded arc RFRSRFRS0 crossing RFRSRFRS1 exactly once, giving RFRSRFRS2 for the associated intersection character RFRSRFRS3.

If RFRSRFRS4 but RFRSRFRS5, then RFRSRFRS6 lifts closed to the arc-cyclic RFRSRFRS7-cover RFRSRFRS8, and since the subloop RFRSRFRS9 changes sheets, that self-intersection is destroyed. Lifting never creates new self-intersections, so the self-intersection count strictly decreases. Crucially, arc-cyclic covers of planar surfaces remain planar: a boundary-counting computation gives PBnPB_n0 and Euler characteristic PBnPB_n1, forcing genus zero.

Iterating yields the planar tower theorem: for any nontrivial PBnPB_n2 and any PBnPB_n3, there is a finite tower of arc-cyclic PBnPB_n4-covers through which PBnPB_n5 lifts closed, terminating at a lift with nonzero integral homology class. Termination follows because the minimal self-intersection number strictly decreases at each step. When the terminal class happens to be divisible by PBnPB_n6, a second phase reduces maximal PBnPB_n7-divisibility: choosing an arc whose mod-PBnPB_n8 character does not vanish on the primitive part PBnPB_n9 of RFRp\mathrm{RFR}p0, the pushforward argument shows the lifted class has strictly smaller RFRp\mathrm{RFR}p1-divisibility. This produces the mod-RFRp\mathrm{RFR}p2 version needed for the RFRp\mathrm{RFR}p3 application.

One should note the hypotheses: the unwrapping machinery relies on minimality of the immersed representative and on the planarity hypothesis in an essential way (the separation lemma and the spanning of RFRp\mathrm{RFR}p4 by arc characters both fail without it).

Boundary control

To promote the topological tower to a group-theoretic one compatible with the semidirect product structure, the authors prove a boundary lifting theorem. Suppose RFRp\mathrm{RFR}p5 acts isotopically on a planar surface RFRp\mathrm{RFR}p6 (by mapping classes fixing basepoint and boundaries pointwise). Such an action acts trivially on RFRp\mathrm{RFR}p7, hence preserves any arc character RFRp\mathrm{RFR}p8 and the corresponding cover subgroup RFRp\mathrm{RFR}p9. For each boundary component pp0, the displacement exponent pp1 measuring how canonical lifts translate marked points in the infinite cyclic cover is shown to be a well-defined homomorphism, independent of the chosen representative. Setting

pp2

yields a finite-index normal subgroup whose elements fix every boundary component of the cover pointwise, inducing an isotopical action on pp3. Moreover, the two-step sequence

pp4

is a partial pp5 tower (and a partial pp6 tower when pp7, since pp8 is then elementary abelian). The key point is that each pp9 vanishes on AnA_n0, so the radical containment required by the tower definition holds automatically.

Semidirect products and the main theorem

Combining these ingredients gives the stability result: if AnA_n1 is finitely generated AnA_n2 (resp. AnA_n3) acting isotopically on a compact planar surface AnA_n4, then AnA_n5 is AnA_n6 (resp. AnA_n7). Elements with nontrivial AnA_n8-component are detected by pulling back a detecting tower for AnA_n9; pure kernel elements Bn=CnB_n = C_n0 are detected by realizing the planar tower of covers and applying boundary control at each stage, so that at the terminal stage Bn=CnB_n = C_n1 fixes all boundary components, acts trivially on Bn=CnB_n = C_n2, and the split homology decomposition detects Bn=CnB_n = C_n3. The Bn=CnB_n = C_n4 case requires the mod-Bn=CnB_n = C_n5 tower theorem together with a final quotient by the kernel of reduction to Bn=CnB_n = C_n6.

Applying this inductively along the Fadell–Neuwirth splitting Bn=CnB_n = C_n7 — where Bn=CnB_n = C_n8 for a planar surface and Bn=CnB_n = C_n9 acts isotopically via the identification RFRSRFRS00 — establishes that RFRSRFRS01 is RFRSRFRS02, indeed RFRSRFRS03 for every prime RFRSRFRS04. The corollary for Artin groups follows from known virtual embeddings: type RFRSRFRS05 into braid groups of type RFRSRFRS06, type RFRSRFRS07 into type RFRSRFRS08 via the Crisp–Paris isomorphism, and type RFRSRFRS09 virtually into RFRSRFRS10 through its embedding in the punctured-sphere mapping class group, using that RFRSRFRS11 passes to subgroups.

A useful contrast drawn in the introduction: mapping class groups of surfaces are not virtually RFRSRFRS12 in general — fibered 3-manifold groups embed in punctured mapping class groups, and the mapping torus of a Dehn twist on a closed surface of genus at least 2 has fundamental group that is not virtually RFRSRFRS13. So the positive result is specific to the braid/pure-braid setting rather than a general phenomenon about mapping class groups.

Limitations and open questions

The paper resolves the virtual RFRSRFRS14 question for braid groups but leaves the broader questions open. Whether full braid groups, or Artin groups in general, are virtually special remains open (Haglund–Wise Problem 9.4, Wise Problem 13.4); since virtually special implies virtually RFRSRFRS15, the results here constitute necessary-condition evidence only, and no virtually special structure for RFRSRFRS16 is constructed. The list of Artin groups covered (RFRSRFRS17, RFRSRFRS18, RFRSRFRS19, RFRSRFRS20, RFRSRFRS21) is limited to those admitting virtual embeddings into (pure) braid groups or being virtually special already; other types, including most spherical and affine types beyond these, are untouched. The method also depends structurally on planarity of the fiber surfaces in the Fadell–Neuwirth splitting, and the paper does not address whether analogous arc-cyclic tower constructions exist for non-planar fibers. Finally, whether braid groups themselves could be virtually RFRSRFRS22 for some prime (rather than merely virtually RFRSRFRS23) is not settled by the argument, which passes through the finite-index subgroup RFRSRFRS24.

Conclusion

This paper answers Agol's modified question affirmatively: pure braid groups are RFRSRFRS25, and in fact RFRSRFRS26 for every prime RFRSRFRS27. The proof introduces a planar curve-unwrapping technique under arc-cyclic covers, together with a boundary control mechanism for isotopical actions, yielding a general stability theorem for semidirect products RFRSRFRS28 over planar surfaces. Beyond braid groups, the transfer to Artin groups of types RFRSRFRS29, RFRSRFRS30, RFRSRFRS31, RFRSRFRS32, and RFRSRFRS33 supplies concrete partial progress toward the virtual specialness conjecture for Artin groups, while leaving the general case open.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.