Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Spanning \(k\)-trees and the colorful Carathéodory theorem

Published 1 Jul 2026 in math.CO | (2607.01143v1)

Abstract: Very recently, using Meshulam's lemma, Blagojević proved a constrained version of the colorful Carathéodory theorem for joins of bipartite spanning trees and wedge of spheres. Our main contribution extends his result from joins of bipartite spanning trees with wedges of spheres to joins of spanning (k)-trees with wedges of spheres. Our proof is elementary and avoids the topological machinery. We also discuss a homological variation of spanning (k)-trees and some Carathéodory-type results for them.

Summary

  • The paper introduces spanning k-trees to generalize the colorful Carathéodory theorem by showing that any colorful map yields a face whose image contains the origin.
  • It presents an elementary proof using geometric minimization, thereby avoiding conventional topological tools such as Meshulam's lemma.
  • The work also develops a homological version with Z2-spanning k-trees, expanding applications to non-spherical settings and matroidal contexts.

Extension of the Colorful Carathéodory Theorem via Spanning kk-Trees

Introduction

The paper "Spanning kk-trees and the colorful Carathéodory theorem" (2607.01143) offers an advancement in discrete and convex geometry by establishing a new extension of the colorful Carathéodory theorem, a foundational result in the theory of convex hulls and geometric combinatorics. The authors generalize recent constrained versions of the colorful Carathéodory theorem—particularly those involving joins of bipartite spanning trees and wedges of spheres—by developing the setting to include arbitrary spanning kk-trees. A distinguishing feature of this work is its avoidance of topological machinery such as Meshulam's lemma, instead presenting an elementary proof based on geometric and combinatorial arguments. Additionally, the paper explores a homological variation of spanning kk-trees, employing Z2\mathbb Z_2-homology, and discusses further generalizations and implications for related Carathéodory-type theorems.

Theoretical Framework and Definitions

The classical colorful Carathéodory theorem asserts that for d+1d+1 finite point sets X1,...,Xd+1X_1, ..., X_{d+1} in Rd\mathbb R^d, if the origin is in conv(Xi)\operatorname{conv}(X_i) for all ii, then there exists a choice of one point from each set so that the origin lies in their convex hull. A reformulation in the setting of abstract simplicial complexes replaces the direct geometric view with a combinatorial one, employing the concept of a "colorful Carathéodory map" on a simplicial join.

A primary notion in this extension is the spanning kk0-tree within a join of finite sets kk1. Such a tree is a subcomplex that contains the full kk2-skeleton and is maximal with the property of containing no kk3-spheres. The paper formalizes this with a combinatorial definition, capturing the structures that interpolate between the single vertex case (kk4) and the standard spanning tree (kk5) in bipartite graphs, and higher-dimensional analogues.

Main Results

Extension of the Colorful Carathéodory Theorem

The central technical result is an extension that, given any spanning kk6-tree kk7 in a join kk8, ensures the existence of a face in kk9 whose image under a colorful Carathéodory map contains the origin. This is encapsulated in the following theorem:

Theorem.

Let kk0, and let kk1 be a spanning kk2-tree. If kk3 is a colorful Carathéodory map, then there exists a face kk4 such that kk5.

Notably, the authors present an elementary proof strategy that avoids the use of advanced topological methods. It relies on geometric minimization arguments inspired by Bárány's original nearest-to-origin approach, extending the standard Carathéodory framework to complex joins and subcomplexes defined by combinatorial constraints.

Homological Generalization

The authors generalize the notion of a spanning kk6-tree to a homological context, introducing kk7-spanning kk8-trees. These are subcomplexes whose inclusion induces vanishing top-dimensional homology and which are maximal with respect to this property. Employing the mapping degree over kk9, they show that the affine image of such a kk0-tree covers the image of the ambient complex, leading to a version of the main result that holds in this homological setting.

Theorem (Homological Version).

Let kk1 be a kk2-spanning kk3-tree in kk4; for a colorful Carathéodory map kk5, there exists a face in kk6 whose image contains the origin.

This approach subsumes the combinatorial definition and applies to wider contexts, including non-spherical complexes and arbitrary triangulations.

Implications and Applications

Structural Differences and Generalized Frameworks

The distinction between combinatorial and homological spanning kk7-trees is significant. While the former is limited by topological type (requiring, e.g., a sphere as a supporting complex), the homological variant enables results in settings such as tori or more general manifolds, where triangulations need not be spherical. This broadens the geometric scenarios in which Carathéodory-type selection theorems can be applied.

Relations to Matroids and Further Theorems

The techniques and results are leveraged to refine various generalizations, including matroidal versions of Carathéodory's theorem (à la Kalai-Meshulam), the "very colorful" Carathéodory theorem, and constrained Tverberg-type statements. For matroidal complexes, the argument shows that the image of any kk8-spanning kk9-tree under an affine map surjects onto the image of the entire complex, yielding new selection results where cocircuit constraints are imposed.

Quantitative and Contradictory Claims

The main theorems assert, in sharp terms, that the covering property of colorful Carathéodory maps extends not just to the full colorful join but to highly constrained subcomplexes defined by the absence of top-dimensional spheres or nontrivial Z2\mathbb Z_20-homology. The authors further demonstrate counterexamples showing that, for Z2\mathbb Z_21, analogous generalizations of the "very colorful" Carathéodory theorem fail, emphasizing optimality in the scope of some results.

Technical Strengths and Key Innovations

  1. Elementary Proof Techniques: The replacement of topological duality and mapping degree arguments with geometric minimization yields more accessible and potentially more generalizable proofs.
  2. Broader Applicability via Homology: Introducing Z2\mathbb Z_22-spanning Z2\mathbb Z_23-trees allows extension to non-spherical topologies and applies to cycles in higher-dimensional, nontrivial homology classes.
  3. Unified Framework: The notion of spanning Z2\mathbb Z_24-trees encapsulates earlier results as extremal cases and provides a unified combinatorial-homological template for further generalizations.

Future Directions

The theoretical apparatus developed supports further abstraction of selection results in convex and discrete geometry, particularly in the direction of:

  • General patterns for higher-dimensional selection in matroid and oriented matroid settings;
  • Topological and combinatorial theorems for manifolds and pseudomanifolds beyond spheres;
  • Algorithmic questions regarding the efficient computation of faces in spanning Z2\mathbb Z_25-trees satisfying Carathéodory-type properties;
  • Quantitative versions and bounds involving the minimality of Z2\mathbb Z_26-trees or minimal covers in more general geometric settings.

Conclusion

This work advances the theory of convex selection statements by systematizing the interaction of affine convexity, topology, and combinatorial structures within the framework of spanning Z2\mathbb Z_27-trees. The generalizations provided not only extend the reach of the colorful Carathéodory theorem but also deepen understanding of the interplay between geometric combinatorics and algebraic topology, setting the stage for continued development in both fields.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.