- The paper introduces hyperbolic *-Ricci and Ricci-Yamabe solitons and classifies their shrinking, steady, or expanding behavior through curvature thresholds involving the trans-Sasakian functions α, β, and the soliton constants.
- It proves that the studied three-dimensional trans-Sasakian space forms are η-Einstein and shows that conformal changes modify soliton parameters through the conformal factor, its Laplacian, and gradient norm rather than curvature alone.
- For totally umbilical two-dimensional submanifolds containing the Reeb field, the paper derives mean-curvature rigidity by fixing the squared mean curvature as ||H||² = μ − 2(α² − β²), and verifies the theory with an explicit β-Kenmotsu example.
Overview
This paper studies self-similar solutions of hyperbolic geometric flows on three-dimensional trans-Sasakian space forms and their submanifolds. The hyperbolic geometric flow, introduced by Kong and Liu to capture the wave character of metrics, evolves a metric by a second-order equation ∂t2∂2g+2S=0, in contrast to the parabolic Ricci flow of Hamilton. Building on the hyperbolic Ricci soliton of Faraji–Azami–Fasihi-Ramandi, the authors introduce two new soliton notions — the hyperbolic ∗-Ricci soliton and the hyperbolic Ricci-Yamabe soliton — and classify their behavior (shrinking, steady, expanding) on trans-Sasakian space forms, conformal trans-Sasakian space forms, and totally umbilical submanifolds thereof.
Background structures
The ambient setting is an almost contact metric manifold (M,φ,ξ,η,g) that is trans-Sasakian, i.e., satisfies
(∇Xφ)Y=α[g(X,Y)ξ−η(Y)X]+β[g(φX,Y)ξ−η(Y)φX],
with α, β smooth functions; by Marrero's classification, trans-Sasakian manifolds of dimension ≥5 are locally cosymplectic, α-Sasakian, or β-Kenmotsu. A trans-Sasakian space form carries constant φ-sectional curvature ∗0, with Ricci tensor ∗1 and scalar curvature ∗2. Throughout, the authors assume ∗3 and take the soliton vector field to be the Reeb field ∗4.
Two computational identities drive all results: since ∗5, one obtains
∗6
Thus both Lie derivatives are pointwise determined by ∗7 alone, which is why every classification below reduces to algebraic conditions on ∗8, ∗9, (M,φ,ξ,η,g)0.
Hyperbolic Ricci-Yamabe flow and soliton
The paper defines the hyperbolic Ricci-Yamabe flow
(M,φ,ξ,η,g)1
where (M,φ,ξ,η,g)2, interpolating between the hyperbolic Ricci flow ((M,φ,ξ,η,g)3) and a hyperbolic analogue of the Yamabe flow ((M,φ,ξ,η,g)4). Via a self-similar ansatz (M,φ,ξ,η,g)5 with (M,φ,ξ,η,g)6, (M,φ,ξ,η,g)7, stationary solutions satisfy
(M,φ,ξ,η,g)8
Theorem (Ricci-Yamabe case). A three-dimensional trans-Sasakian space form with (M,φ,ξ,η,g)9 admitting such a soliton along (∇Xφ)Y=α[g(X,Y)ξ−η(Y)X]+β[g(φX,Y)ξ−η(Y)φX],0 is (∇Xφ)Y=α[g(X,Y)ξ−η(Y)X]+β[g(φX,Y)ξ−η(Y)φX],1-Einstein, with
(∇Xφ)Y=α[g(X,Y)ξ−η(Y)X]+β[g(φX,Y)ξ−η(Y)φX],2
Consequently the soliton is shrinking, steady, or expanding according as (∇Xφ)Y=α[g(X,Y)ξ−η(Y)X]+β[g(φX,Y)ξ−η(Y)φX],3, equality, or (∇Xφ)Y=α[g(X,Y)ξ−η(Y)X]+β[g(φX,Y)ξ−η(Y)φX],4. The classification therefore depends on the (∇Xφ)Y=α[g(X,Y)ξ−η(Y)X]+β[g(φX,Y)ξ−η(Y)φX],5-sectional curvature relative to a threshold set by the structure functions and the flow parameters.
Hyperbolic (∇Xφ)Y=α[g(X,Y)ξ−η(Y)X]+β[g(φX,Y)ξ−η(Y)φX],6-Ricci solitons
The authors first compute the (∇Xφ)Y=α[g(X,Y)ξ−η(Y)X]+β[g(φX,Y)ξ−η(Y)φX],7-Ricci tensor of a trans-Sasakian space form:
(∇Xφ)Y=α[g(X,Y)ξ−η(Y)X]+β[g(φX,Y)ξ−η(Y)φX],8
which in dimension three specializes to (∇Xφ)Y=α[g(X,Y)ξ−η(Y)X]+β[g(φX,Y)ξ−η(Y)φX],9; hence every three-dimensional trans-Sasakian space form is automatically α0-α1-Einstein. This structural fact underlies the following classifications.
For the classical α2-Ricci soliton α3 with α4, contraction yields α5: the soliton shrinks when α6, is steady at α7, and expands when α8. Notably, this condition is independent of α9 and β0.
For the newly introduced hyperbolic β1-Ricci soliton,
β2
the authors obtain β3, so the soliton expands, is steady, or shrinks according as β4, equality, or β5. Here the threshold involves only β6 and β7, not β8.
Three further classifications follow from the same mechanism:
| Soliton type |
Key relations |
Shrinking condition |
| Hyperbolic Ricci |
β9, ≥50 |
≥51 |
| Hyperbolic conformal Ricci |
≥52, ≥53 |
≥54 |
| Hyperbolic Yamabe |
≥55, ≥56 |
≥57 |
In each case the underlying manifold is shown to be ≥58-Einstein. The hyperbolic Yamabe result is particularly rigid: ≥59 forces the soliton type to be dictated entirely by the sign of the α0-function of the trans-Sasakian structure, independent of curvature.
For a conformal change α1 preserving the trans-Sasakian type, the connection transforms via the Lee vector field α2, and the Ricci tensors relate by
α3
where α4. Substituting into the hyperbolic Ricci soliton equation gives
α5
The soliton parameter thus depends explicitly on the conformal factor through its Laplacian and gradient norm, so no fixed shrinking/steady/expanding dichotomy in terms of α6 alone survives under conformal deformation — a qualitative departure from the unwarped case.
Submanifolds
For a two-dimensional totally umbilical submanifold α7 of a three-dimensional trans-Sasakian space form containing α8, the Gauss equation together with umbilicity (α9) yields
β0
Imposing the hyperbolic Ricci soliton equation then forces
β1
The first relation is a rigidity statement: existence of the soliton pins down the squared mean curvature of the submanifold in terms of the ambient structure functions and the soliton constant β2.
Example
The authors construct an explicit model on β3 with frame β4, β5, β6. This is a trans-Sasakian manifold of type β7 (hence β8-Kenmotsu) with β9-sectional curvature φ0 and Ricci tensor φ1. Taking φ2, direct computation of the Lie derivatives gives φ3 from the soliton equation, while the general formulas give φ4, φ5 — consistent with the derived relation. The example confirms the classification theorems in a concrete φ6-Kenmotsu space form.
Limitations and open questions
Several restrictions qualify the results. All classifications assume the soliton vector field is the Reeb field φ7 rather than an arbitrary vector field or a gradient potential, so the analysis does not address non-Reeb or gradient hyperbolic solitons on these spaces. The hypothesis φ8 excludes cosymplectic and φ9-Sasakian cases, where the identities for ∗00 degenerate and separate treatment would be required. The submanifold theorem is restricted to dimension two and total umbilicity; whether analogous mean-curvature rigidity holds for higher-dimensional or non-umbilical submanifolds remains open. Finally, the conformal case produces ∗01 in terms of ∗02, ∗03, and ∗04 without yielding a clean sign-based classification, leaving open the question of which conformal factors admit shrinking or expanding hyperbolic solitons.
Conclusion
The paper extends the theory of hyperbolic geometric flow solitons to contact metric geometry by introducing hyperbolic ∗05-Ricci and hyperbolic Ricci-Yamabe solitons and classifying them, together with hyperbolic Ricci, conformal Ricci, and Yamabe solitons, on three-dimensional trans-Sasakian space forms. The unifying mechanism — explicit formulas for the first and second Lie derivatives of the metric along ∗06 — reduces each classification to threshold inequalities on the ∗07-sectional curvature ∗08 involving ∗09, ∗10, and the soliton constants. The conformal and submanifold results show how these thresholds deform under conformal change and how soliton existence imposes mean-curvature rigidity, and the explicit ∗11-Kenmotsu example verifies the framework computationally.