Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Trans-Sasakian Manifolds: A Unified Framework

Updated 3 January 2026
  • Trans-Sasakian manifolds are (2n+1)-dimensional spaces with almost contact metric structures that generalize both contact and cosymplectic geometries.
  • They are defined by a pair of smooth functions (α, β) that determine the interpolation between Sasakian, Kenmotsu, and cosymplectic conditions.
  • Their rich transverse, curvature, and harmonic properties drive applications in geometric flows, soliton solutions, and complex structure constructions.

A trans-Sasakian manifold is a (2n+1)(2n+1)-dimensional smooth manifold equipped with an almost contact metric structure that generalizes both Sasakian and Kenmotsu geometries. These manifolds interpolate between contact and cosymplectic geometries and possess rich transverse and variational structures, making them central in the study of contact metric, Hermitian, and non-Kähler geometries, as well as in the analysis of geometric flows and harmonic mappings.

1. Structure of Trans-Sasakian Manifolds

Let (M2n+1,ϕ,ξ,η,g)(M^{2n+1},\phi,\xi,\eta,g) be an almost contact metric manifold, where ϕ\phi is a (1,1)(1,1) tensor field, ξ\xi is a global vector field (the Reeb field), η\eta is a 1-form, and gg is a Riemannian metric. These satisfy

η(ξ)=1,ϕ2=Id+ηξ,g(ϕX,ϕY)=g(X,Y)η(X)η(Y)\eta(\xi)=1,\qquad \phi^2 = -\mathrm{Id} + \eta\otimes\xi,\qquad g(\phi X, \phi Y) = g(X,Y) - \eta(X)\eta(Y)

for all vector fields X,YX,Y on MM. The fundamental $2$-form is Φ(X,Y)=g(X,ϕY)\Phi(X,Y) = g(X, \phi Y).

A trans-Sasakian structure of type (α,β)(\alpha,\beta), for smooth functions α,β\alpha, \beta on MM, is defined by the normality condition (vanishing Nijenhuis torsion) and the covariant derivative condition

(Xϕ)Y=α(g(X,Y)ξη(Y)X)+β(g(ϕX,Y)ξη(Y)ϕX).(\nabla_X\phi)Y = \alpha\bigl(g(X,Y)\xi - \eta(Y)X\bigr) + \beta\bigl(g(\phi X, Y)\xi - \eta(Y)\phi X\bigr).

Equivalently,

dη=αΦ,dΦ=2βηΦ.d\eta = \alpha\,\Phi,\qquad d\Phi = 2\beta\,\eta\wedge\Phi.

Specialized classes within trans-Sasakian manifolds are given by fixed values of (α,β)(\alpha,\beta):

  • (1,0)(1,0): Sasakian
  • (0,1)(0,1): Kenmotsu
  • (0,0)(0,0): Cosymplectic

2. Geometric and Curvature Properties

Trans-Sasakian manifolds possess a distinguished distribution D=kerη\mathcal{D} = \ker\eta invariant under ϕ\phi and parallel with respect to a transverse Levi-Civita connection. Basic curvature formulas (for X,YΓ(TM)X,Y\in\Gamma(TM)) include: Xξ=αϕXβϕ2X,(Xη)(Y)=αg(X,ϕY)+βg(ϕX,ϕY).\nabla_X \xi = -\alpha\,\phi X - \beta\,\phi^2 X, \qquad (\nabla_X \eta)(Y) = \alpha\,g(X,\phi Y) + \beta\,g(\phi X,\phi Y). The structure is normal; thus, the Nijenhuis torsion NϕN_\phi vanishes identically, and the distribution D\mathcal{D} inherits a natural almost-Kählerian structure when β0\beta \equiv 0.

The curvature operator admits an explicit expression in terms of α\alpha, β\beta, ϕ\phi, and the transverse curvature. For U,V,WΓ(D)U,V,W\in\Gamma(\mathcal{D}),

R(U,V)W=RT(U,V)W+α2[Φ(V,W)ϕU2Φ(U,V)ϕWΦ(U,W)ϕV]+,R(U,V)W = R^T(U,V)W + \alpha^2[\Phi(V,W)\phi U - 2\Phi(U,V)\phi W - \Phi(U,W)\phi V] + \cdots,

with the full formula given in (Yadav et al., 13 Nov 2025).

3. Canonical Examples and Classification

The local geometry of trans-Sasakian manifolds is determined by the pair (α,β)(\alpha,\beta):

  • Sasakian: α=1\alpha=1, β=0\beta=0. Classical examples include S2n+1S^{2n+1} with the standard contact structure.
  • Kenmotsu: α=0\alpha=0, β=1\beta=1; recovers the canonical warped metric example.
  • Cosymplectic: α=β=0\alpha=\beta=0; MM is locally a product of a symplectic manifold with R\mathbb R.

In dimensions 5\geq 5, any trans-Sasakian manifold is either Sasakian, Kenmotsu, or cosymplectic (Yadav et al., 13 Nov 2025).

The table below summarizes the defining equations for primary subclasses:

Type (α,β)(\alpha,\beta) dηd\eta dΦd\Phi Contact condition
Sasakian (1,0)(1,0) Φ\Phi $0$ η(dη)n0\eta\wedge(d\eta)^n\ne 0
Kenmotsu (0,1)(0,1) $0$ 2ηΦ2\eta\wedge\Phi $0$
Cosymplectic (0,0)(0,0) $0$ $0$ $0$
Trans-Sasakian (α,β)(\alpha, \beta) αΦ\alpha\Phi 2βηΦ2\beta\eta\wedge\Phi Contact/Noncontact by α\alpha

(Alegre et al., 2016, Yadav et al., 13 Nov 2025)

Compactness and Ricci conditions yield rigidity results, especially in dimension 3:

  • If the Ricci operator QQ satisfies Q(ξ)=λξQ(\xi) = \lambda \xi, λ0\lambda \ne 0, then MM is homothetic to a Sasakian manifold (Deshmukh et al., 2012).
  • Cosymplecticity is characterized by Q(ξ)=0Q(\xi) = 0 on compact, connected 3-manifolds (Deshmukh et al., 2012).

4. Hermitian and Harmonic Structures on Products

For products M1×M2M_1 \times M_2 of trans-Sasakian manifolds, canonical Hermitian structures arise via the Morimoto–Tsukada–Watson construction (Yadav et al., 13 Nov 2025). Given (Mi,ϕi,ξi,ηi,gi)(M_i, \phi_i, \xi_i, \eta_i, g_i) of type (αi,βi)(\alpha_i,\beta_i), an almost complex structure JJ and metric ga,bg_{a,b} are defined, yielding an integrable Hermitian structure if both factors are normal.

The Dirichlet energy functional for (orthogonal) almost complex structures,

E(J)=MJ2volg,E(J) = \int_M \|\nabla J\|^2\,\mathrm{vol}_g,

admits critical points, called harmonic almost complex structures, characterized by the vanishing of the tension field: [J,J]=0[J,\nabla^*\nabla J]=0. For trans-Sasakian products, harmonicity of JJ reduces to checking vanishing of certain endomorphisms involving αi,βi\alpha_i,\beta_i (Yadav et al., 13 Nov 2025). Notably:

  • All products of two Sasakian, Kenmotsu, or cosymplectic manifolds carry harmonic Morimoto–Tsukada–Watson complex structures.
  • The Calabi–Eckmann manifolds S2p+1×S2q+1S^{2p+1}\times S^{2q+1} (Sasakian on both factors) admit harmonic Hermitian structures of this type.
  • Products of cosymplectic manifolds are astheno-Kähler and hence yield harmonic complex structures.

5. Differential Equations and Soliton Geometries

Trans-Sasakian manifolds serve as settings for various soliton and curvature flow equations.

η-Einstein Solitons: In the 3-dimensional case, a trans-Sasakian manifold (M3,ϕ,ξ,η,g)(M^3, \phi, \xi, \eta, g) can support an η-Einstein soliton

12LVg+Ric+(λr)g+νηη=0,\frac{1}{2} \mathcal{L}_V g + \mathrm{Ric} + (\lambda - r)g + \nu\,\eta\otimes\eta = 0,

where VV is a vector field, possibly collinear or torse-forming with respect to ξ\xi. For V=ξV=\xi, the Ricci tensor is necessarily η-Einstein and the scalar curvature is constant (Ganguly et al., 2021).

η-Yamabe Solitons: Similarly, an η-Yamabe soliton on a trans-Sasakian 3-manifold is governed by

LVg=(rλ)g+μηη.L_V g = (r-\lambda)g + \mu\,\eta\otimes\eta.

Such metrics force the scalar curvature to be constant and the manifold to be η-Einstein (Roy et al., 2020). Ricci symmetry and recurrent structures further constrain (α,β)(\alpha,\beta). Examples of trans-Sasakian 3-manifolds admitting such solitons include Kenmotsu structures on open domains in R3\mathbb R^3.

6. Submanifold Theory and Transverse Maps

Trans-Sasakian geometry is compatible with submanifold and map-theoretic constructions:

  • Invariant Submanifolds: In the Lorentzian setting, a submanifold NMN\subset M is invariant if ξTN\xi\in TN and ϕ(TN)TN\phi(TN)\subset TN. Such submanifolds inherit strong restrictions, particularly via Tachibana operator techniques—most often, imposing vanishing conditions forces NN to be totally geodesic or places differential constraints on (α,β)(\alpha,\beta) (Atçeken et al., 2024).
  • Clairaut Anti-invariant Riemannian Maps: Anti-invariant Riemannian maps from a Riemannian manifold (N,h)(N, h) to a trans-Sasakian manifold (M,φ,ξ,η,g)(M, \varphi, \xi, \eta, g), satisfying φ(Ranπ)(Ranπ)\varphi(\mathrm{Ran}\,\pi_*)\subset (\mathrm{Ran}\,\pi_*)^\perp, are Clairaut if a specific geometric conservation law holds for geodesics. Harmonicity of such maps is equivalent to the minimality of the vertical distribution (Zaidi et al., 2023).

7. Almost Contact Curves and Dynamics

In the 3-dimensional case, the behavior of almost contact (Legendre) curves is controlled by the trans-Sasakian structure:

  • Any Frenet curve y:IMy:I\to M with tangent TT in the contact distribution (η(T)=0\eta(T)=0) inherits explicit curvature and torsion formulas depending on α\alpha and β\beta: κ(s)=ϑ(s)2+β(s)2,τ(s)=α(s)+β(s)ϑ(s)β(s)ϑ(s)ϑ(s)2+β(s)2\kappa(s) = \sqrt{\vartheta(s)^2 + \beta(s)^2},\qquad \tau(s) = \left| \alpha(s) + \frac{\beta(s)\vartheta'(s) - \beta'(s)\vartheta(s)}{\vartheta(s)^2 + \beta(s)^2} \right| with ϑ(s)=g(TT,ϕT)\vartheta(s) = g(\nabla_T T, \phi T) (Srivastava, 2013). These invariants distinguish dynamical and sub-Riemannian properties, with explicit curvature-torsion behavior acting as signatures of the underlying ambient trans-Sasakian geometry.

Trans-Sasakian geometry forms a bridge between contact metric structures and almost complex geometry, providing a broad categorical framework that unifies Sasakian, Kenmotsu, and cosymplectic geometries. Its roles in harmonicity, submanifold theory, soliton solutions, and the construction of canonical Hermitian and astheno-Kähler metrics contribute substantially to geometric analysis, with continued developments illuminating connections with mathematical physics and geometric flows (Yadav et al., 13 Nov 2025, Ganguly et al., 2021, Roy et al., 2020, Srivastava, 2013, Zaidi et al., 2023, Atçeken et al., 2024, Alegre et al., 2016, Deshmukh et al., 2012).

Whiteboard

Topic to Video (Beta)

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Trans-Sasakian Manifolds.