- The paper demonstrates that including decoupled SST and CO₂ training data enables robust separation of their respective impacts in machine-learned climate emulators.
- The novel stochastic architecture, enhanced with physical constraints and energy conservation, achieves accurate replication of both instantaneous and equilibrium climate responses.
- The approach underscores the importance of diverse training data for reliable extrapolation to policy-relevant and extreme forcing scenarios.
Disentangling SST and CO2 Effects in Machine-Learned Global Climate Emulators
Introduction
This paper addresses a critical limitation in current ML-based atmospheric emulators: poor generalization to climate scenarios where key forcings—sea surface temperature (SST) and atmospheric CO2 concentration—are independently perturbed, a regime often encountered in idealized and policy-relevant climate experiments. Previous instantiations of the Ai2 Climate Emulator (ACE) demonstrated good performance within the narrow support of their training distributions, where SST and CO2 are highly correlated, but produced unphysical or erroneous results when these forcings are decoupled. The presented work introduces new reference datasets and a stochastic model architecture to robustly separate and emulate the respective climate responses to changes in SST and CO2, with explicit attention to energy conservation and data efficiency.
Methodology
The study leverages the SHIELD atmospheric GCM at coarse resolution as the emulation target, consistent with prior ACE work. Three categories of reference simulations are utilized:
- AMIP (Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project): Periods with observed SST, sea ice, and transient CO2 concentration.
- SOM-coupled: Equilibrium, transient, and abruptly forced runs with a slab-ocean model, sampling a range of CO2 levels (1x–4x present).
- Ramped-SST-random-CO2: Novel reference simulations wherein ensemble members are forced with dynamically and independently evolving SST and CO2—thereby breaking their climatological correlation.
Models are trained in two principal configurations: with and without inclusion of the random-CO2 datasets. Additionally, ablations are performed on the use of a global energy conservation corrector. The ML architecture evolves from previous deterministic spherical Fourier neural operators (SFNO) to a stochastic variant akin to ACE2S with increased model capacity (embedding dimension), probabilistic loss (CRPS/energy score), and physical constraints (flux positivity, global and column moisture/dry air conservation).
Numerical Results
In conventional regimes where SST and CO20 remain correlated—as in historical AMIP or equilibrium slab-ocean experiments—the model trained with random-CO21 data ("ACE2S-SHIELD22") achieves performance comparable to baseline ACE2-SHIELD and ACE2-SOM. This includes:
- R23 of 0.81–0.93 for annual global-mean 2m temperature, competitive with baselines.
- Ensemble spread and precipitation statistics consistent with the target model.
- Minor increases in pattern RMSE over sea-ice regions, likely attributed to limited training in these boundary regimes.
- Long-term stability in coupled equilibrated climates, with one out of four 1000-year runs exhibiting an upper-stratospheric shift, attributed primarily to model stochasticity.
The core advancement is in scenarios characterized by strong SST–CO25 decorrelation:
- AMIP with Fixed CO26: Baseline ACE2-SHIELD underestimates the surface warming response when CO27 is held fixed and SST is allowed to evolve, while ACE2S-SHIELD28 accurately distinguishes the correct roles of each forcing on surface and stratospheric temperatures.
- AMIP +4K (Uniform SST Increase): ACE2S-SHIELD29 recovers the physically expected near-uniform surface warming (204.4 K global mean, RMSE 21 0.3 K) and correct radiative and hydrological responses, outperforming ablated models and previous literature where land surface cooling was spuriously predicted under these circumstances.
- Ramped-SST-random-CO22: In instances with highly variable, independently sampled CO23 and SST paths, only models exposed to this decorrelated domain during training emulate the correct instantaneous and equilibrated responses in the troposphere and stratosphere, both in trend and response timescale.
- Abrupt 4xCO24 (SOM-Coupled): Models without random-CO25 training demonstrate nonphysical, step-like temperature adjustments or an unrealistically fast precipitation and hydrological cycle response due to misattribution of forcing sources. ACE2S-SHIELD26 not only reproduces the correct radiative, thermodynamic, and moisture responses but also accurately captures the timescales and spatial patterns of adjustment over both short (90-day) and long (10-year) horizons.
Role of Energetic Constraints
Inclusion of a global energy conservation corrector improves interpretability and attenuates some pathologies when random-CO27 data is not present, but is not, by itself, sufficient to guarantee physical generalization to held-out or extreme forcing scenarios. Once randomly sampled CO28 states are included in the training regime, the stochastic model recovers energy-conserving, robust behavior, and the benefit of the explicit energy corrector becomes marginal for the considered metrics.
Implications and Future Directions
This study demonstrates that data-driven atmospheric emulators can accurately and stably generalize to a much wider manifold of climate forcing scenarios if their training data properly samples the space of independently evolving boundary conditions and drivers. The results underscore the paramount importance of training data diversity—not just for i.i.d. interpolation, but for robust extrapolation to out-of-distribution or policy-relevant future scenarios.
The approach delineates a scalable path toward unified, data-driven general circulation emulation frameworks that remain accurate under non-equilibrium and idealized forcing regimes—scenarios central to physical attribution, feedback evaluation, and impact assessment experiments. However, important limitations remain:
- Component limitations: The current architecture employs highly simplified or prescribed representations of ocean, land, and ice, restricting its application to fully coupled, interactive Earth system modeling.
- Limited forcing exposure: Only CO29 is considered; future models must address more complex, multi-forcing scenarios (e.g., aerosols, CH20, N21O) with similar decorrelation and data generation strategies.
- Dependence on GCM “perfect model” assumption: Transfer to observation-trained models faces additional generalization and bias correction challenges.
Potential extensions include integration into coupled emulators (e.g., “SamudrACE”) and hybrid physics-ML frameworks to further improve extrapolative skill, especially where explicit constraints (e.g., conservation laws) can be more tightly integrated with learned representations.
Conclusion
By supplementing ML-based atmospheric emulator training with simulations spanning uncorrelated SST and CO22 evolution, the presented methodology yields a stochastic neural surrogate that robustly separates and emulates the climate impacts of major external forcings. This addresses previously identified generalization failures in ML-based climate models, facilitating their application to a more comprehensive set of idealized and future climate scenarios while maintaining computational and data efficiency. The findings reinforce the essential interplay between training data design and physical emulator reliability, setting clear research directions towards robust, multi-forcing, coupled-system emulation.