Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Manifold Sampling via Entropy Maximization

Published 12 May 2026 in cs.LG, cs.AI, and stat.CO | (2605.12338v1)

Abstract: Sampling from constrained distributions has a wide range of applications, including in Bayesian optimization and robotics. Prior work establishes convergence and feasibility guarantees for constrained sampling, but assumes that the feasible set is connected. However, in practice, the feasible set often decomposes into multiple disconnected components, which makes efficient sampling under constraints challenging. In this paper, we propose MAnifold Sampling via Entropy Maximization (MASEM) for sampling on a manifold with an unknown number of disconnected components, implicitly defined by smooth equality and inequality constraints. The presented method uses a resampling scheme to maximize the entropy of the empirical distribution based on k-nearest neighbor density estimation. We show that, in the mean field, MASEM decreases the KL-divergence between the empirical distribution and the maximum-entropy target exponentially in the number of resampling steps. We instantiate MASEM with multiple local samplers and demonstrate its versatility and efficiency on synthetic and robotics-based benchmarks. MASEM enables fast and scalable mixing across a range of constrained sampling problems, improving over alternatives by an order of magnitude in Sinkhorn distance with competitive runtime.

Summary

  • The paper introduces MASEM, which employs entropy maximization to uniformly sample constrained manifolds, even when disconnected.
  • It combines penalty-based Gauss–Newton initialization, feasibility-preserving local mixing, and k-NN density estimation to achieve global mass allocation.
  • Empirical and theoretical results show exponential KL divergence contraction and significant performance gains over conventional sampling methods in robotics and high-dimensional settings.

Manifold Sampling via Entropy Maximization (MASEM): A Technical Overview

Motivation and Problem Setting

Sampling uniformly from implicitly defined, constrained manifolds is a crucial requirement in diverse domains such as Bayesian inference, robotic motion planning, and molecular design. While classical constrained MCMC approaches guarantee feasibility and local mixing, they fundamentally rely on local transition kernels. This locality assumption precludes correct probability mass allocation across disconnected components, which is common in real-world problems due to the nonconvexity and complex structure of constraints. Addressing this limitation, the paper introduces Manifold Sampling via Entropy Maximization (MASEM) (2605.12338), a scalable, modular framework for uniform sampling on arbitrary constrained manifolds, regardless of the connectivity of the feasible set.

Methodology

MASEM targets the maximization of the empirical entropy of samples over the feasible manifold, thereby promoting uniform mass allocation even across disconnected components—without requiring explicit knowledge of their number, topology, or volumes.

The key steps of the MASEM algorithm are:

  1. Initialization: Randomly sample points in the ambient space, followed by projection onto the constraint manifold via penalty-based Gauss–Newton minimization, ensuring initial component coverage with high probability as NN \to \infty.
  2. Local Mixing: Apply a feasibility-preserving local kernel (e.g., NHR, OLLA) for intra-component mixing, assuming rapid within-component equilibration.
  3. Entropy-based Resampling:
    • Estimate local sample density using kk-nearest neighbor (kk-NN) statistics adapted to the intrinsic manifold dimension.
    • Assign each sample an importance weight inversely proportional to its local estimated density (i.e., proportional to its kk-NN radius raised to a temperature parameter τ\tau).
    • Resample according to these weights, redistributing samples toward underrepresented components, maximizing entropy.

This resampling is modular: it can be inserted into any feasible local sampler with minimal adjustments, yielding uniform coverage over disconnected components.

Theoretical Results

The analysis proceeds in the mean-field limit, reducing the stochastic particle system to a deterministic dynamical system on the simplex of component weights. The crucial theoretical result is the exponential contraction of KL divergence to the target uniform distribution under successive entropy-based resampling operations.

Given τ\tau the temperature parameter and pp the manifold's intrinsic dimension, after tt iterations, the expected KL divergence satisfies

DKL(pαtuΣ)C0(1τ/p)2t,D_{\mathrm{KL}}(p_{\alpha_t} \| u_{\Sigma}) \leq C_0 (1 - \tau/p)^{2t},

where C0C_0 depends logarithmically on the number of samples and the initial misallocation of mass.

This establishes that MASEM contracts the KL divergence towards the uniform measure at a geometric rate. The probability of failing to populate a component decays exponentially in the number of chains per component, as rigorously quantified and supported by empirical studies (see Figure 1).

Empirical Evaluation

Synthetic Benchmarks

MASEM is benchmarked against contemporary local samplers—NHR, OLLA—and global methods, including SCMC and explicit clustering. The evaluation involves low-dimensional synthetic manifolds (e.g., multi-disk, sine curve, Swiss roll) both in connected and disconnected settings.

Standard local samplers systematically fail to allocate mass proportionally across disconnected components, often underrepresenting larger-volume regions and failing to assign mass to isolated modes. Figure 2

Figure 2: Empirical sample distributions for classical and MASEM-augmented samplers on synthetic benchmarks; base methods fail to assign correct mass, while MASEM achieves uniformity across all components.

Quantitative metrics—Sinkhorn distance, pairwise KL divergence, and constraint violation—demonstrate that MASEM-augmented samplers outperform all baselines by up to an order of magnitude on disconnected settings. Notably, MASEM does not degrade performance in the connected (trivial) case.

High-dimensional Scaling

MASEM's robustness is assessed via stress tests involving scaling both the ambient and intrinsic manifold dimensions, as well as the number of constraints and disconnected components. Sampling error remains stable with increasing ambient dimension if the manifold dimension is held constant, suggesting that the intrinsic dimensionality is the dominant factor. Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3: Scaling performance as ambient and manifold dimensions increase with fixed constraint count; MASEM maintains lower Sinkhorn distances compared to alternatives.

Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4: Benchmarking against alternative/global samplers as manifold and ambient dimension scale; MASEM maintains order-of-magnitude improvements.

Robotics Applications

Practical relevance is validated through motion planning and grasp optimization tasks. In high-constraint scenarios (trajectory parameterization with hundreds of constraints, grasping with nonconvex contact constraints), MASEM dramatically improves the entropy and coverage of feasible trajectories and grasps. Figure 5

Figure 5: Comparison of sampled motion planning trajectories with random obstacles, highlighting MASEM’s superior component coverage and entropy.

MASEM also enables coverage of narrow passages and rare events in trajectory generation tasks, supporting applications requiring diverse solution sets for robust robot policy initialization and behavior cloning.

Convergence Metrics

Comprehensive convergence diagnostics on all tasks confirm the theoretical exponential decay in divergence and indicate that high sample quality is maintained throughout the optimization. Figure 6

Figure 6

Figure 6

Figure 6

Figure 6

Figure 6

Figure 6: Convergence curves for Sinkhorn distance, pairwise distance KL divergence, and mean constraint violation, demonstrating rapid mass redistribution and feasibility.

Figure 7

Figure 7: Qualitative sample distributions for NHR and MASEM-NHR on various manifolds with disconnected/curved structure; MASEM ensures proper coverage.

Component Loss Analysis

Robustness to component loss is analyzed, showing that even with a moderate number of chains per component (kk0), the probability of failing to represent any mode is negligible for practical entropy scaling parameters kk1. Figure 1

Figure 1: Component coverage as a function of kk2 and number of chains, highlighting negligible component loss above four chains per component.

Practical Implications and Limitations

Practical implications include:

  • MASEM significantly increases sample diversity, supporting initialization and exploration strategies in high-dimensional, constrained optimization and RL tasks requiring unbiased coverage.
  • The modular resampling step generalizes to any feasible local sampler, enhancing their utility in multi-component and multimodal settings.
  • The lightweight design incurs minimal runtime overhead (kk3 per resampling) and is robust to hyperparameter choices, as demonstrated empirically.

Limitations noted in the analysis:

  • The approach in its present form targets uniform distributions; extension to non-uniform targets is possible but outside the current scope.
  • The optimal choice of the temperature parameter kk4 requires knowledge of the intrinsic manifold dimension, which is not always directly available.
  • Theoretical results are predicated on the large-particle (mean-field) regime and near-perfect within-component mixing.

Theoretical and Methodological Implications

MASEM establishes a new paradigm for constrained sampling by leveraging entropy maximization and kk5-NN-based density estimation within an SMC-inspired framework. The interplay between density estimation on manifolds and particle-based resampling is central, enabling the resolution of the local-to-global allocation problem that impedes all previous local approaches. The theoretical framework—based on geometric contraction of KL divergence under resampling—provides a blueprint for future generalizations, including non-uniform targets and adaptive resampling schedules.

Future Directions

Key avenues include:

  • Extension to non-uniform target measures for posterior inference and importance sampling.
  • Adaptive or automated selection of manifold dimension and temperature hyperparameters.
  • Integration with learned local kernels and application-specific transformations (e.g., in robotic manipulation, chemical design).
  • Investigation of theoretical guarantees under imperfect mixing and finite-kk6 settings.

Conclusion

MASEM provides a theoretically grounded, empirically robust solution to uniform sampling on implicitly defined, disconnected manifolds. By augmenting local feasible kernels with entropy-driven resampling, it rapidly and reliably achieves global mass allocation, laying the groundwork for more general constrained sampling strategies and facilitating complex applications in robotics and machine learning.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.