- The paper introduces the ReSP formulation as a relaxation of the sparsest-permutation constraint, using masked feasibility to operate on the support of the precision matrix.
- It leverages a sparse-Cholesky (IC(0)) based pipeline (SCOPE) to efficiently construct candidate factors and select the sparsest model, enhancing scalability.
- Empirical results demonstrate that SCOPE achieves competitive recovery accuracy and reduced runtime in both synthetic settings and high-dimensional breast cancer mRNA data.
Motivation and Context
Causal structure learning in high-dimensional settings faces a fundamental tradeoff between statistical precision and computational scalability. Exact methods, such as constraint-based (PC), score-based (GES), and continuous optimization approaches (NOTEARS, GOLEM), rapidly become infeasible as the number of variables (p) grows to tens of thousands. The sparsest-permutation (SP) formulation for structure learning in linear SEMs offers theoretical guarantees by searching over orderings to produce the sparsest Cholesky factor, but its computational demands are prohibitive. This paper introduces a principled relaxation—Relaxed Sparsest-Permutation (ReSP)—which circumvents the need for exact factorization and instead operates at the support level of the population precision matrix, enabling scalable causal discovery while preserving key recovery guarantees.
Traditional SP learning demands that for each variable ordering π, the permuted precision matrix Ωπ​ be represented exactly as Lπ​Lπ⊤​, where Lπ​ is lower triangular. ReSP replaces the exact constraint with masked feasibility: only entries at positions determined by a mask Mπ​ (the support of Ωπ​) need match in Lπ​Lπ⊤​ and Ωπ​. Zero-fill incomplete Cholesky factorization (IC(0)) is used for efficient construction of sparse triangular factors under the mask, leveraging well-established sparse linear algebra routines. The formulation ensures that no spurious fill-in occurs outside the screened support, and comparisons are made based on the sparsity of Lπ​ within π0. Theoretical analysis confirms that under no-cancellation and sparsest Markov representation (SMR) conditions, ReSP recovers the correct Markov equivalence class (MEC) and is robust to ordering misspecification.
SCOPE: Scalable Sparse-Cholesky Pipeline
SCOPE operationalizes the ReSP relaxation in finite sample settings. The pipeline consists of four stages:
- Precision Estimation: A sparse estimator for the precision matrix (e.g., DRO-calibrated graphical lasso) provides the support mask.
- Masked Factor Construction: IC(0) masked by the support constructs candidate π1 for each ordering in the candidate set.
- Refit-and-Test Pruning: Local regressions prune small coefficients, eliminating false positives especially from moralization-induced edges.
- Sparsity-Based Selection: The sparsest factor across candidates is selected as the output.
For maximal scalability, SCOPE defaults to a one-pass strategy with an approximate minimum-degree ordering (AMD), resulting in cubic worst-case complexity dominated by the initial precision estimation.
Theoretical Guarantees
The ReSP formulation yields the following:
- Soundness: With an admissible candidate ordering that aligns with the true structure and under SMR, ReSP minimizes a sparsity objective and recovers a DAG in the correct MEC.
- Robustness: Under arbitrary candidate orderings, the support mask guarantees that all induced edges remain confined to the moral graph, suppressing false discoveries outside the true skeleton.
Empirical Evaluation
Runtime-Accuracy Tradeoff

Figure 1: Runtime-accuracy tradeoffs for MEC recovery across baseline causal discovery methods (means ± error bars) for synthetic Gaussian linear SEMs with bounded in-degree π2, π3, and π4.
Empirical results demonstrate that SCOPE achieves strong recovery accuracy comparable to exact methods, but with drastically reduced runtime. Baselines such as PC, GES, GOLEM, and NOTEARS require extensive computational resources or fail to scale, while SCOPE readily handles π5 variables.

Figure 2: CPDAG π6 versus runtime across problem sizes (bubble size π7); π8 denotes timed-out runs. Two one-pass SCOPE results: oracle and AMD heuristic orderings.
SCOPE maintains high π9 scores for CPDAG recovery across increasing Ωπ​0. When the true ordering is provided, the recovery approaches optimality (Ωπ​1), while the heuristic AMD ordering sustains moderate accuracy (Ωπ​2) even at Ωπ​3.
Skeleton and Structural Recovery

Figure 3: CPDAG-skeleton Ωπ​4 scores for bounded in-degree linear SEMs (means ± 1 standard error, 30 replicates).

Figure 4: Normalized structural Hamming distance (nSHD) for CPDAG recovery, indicating consistent structure estimation across replicates.
Across variable in-degree and noise types, SCOPE remains robust, with accuracy only moderately affected by graph densification. Competing methods such as FROSTY and RFD deteriorate rapidly in high-Ωπ​5 regimes, exhibiting large nSHD and near-zero Ωπ​6 beyond moderate Ωπ​7.
Real Data Analysis: Breast Cancer mRNA Expression
SCOPE was applied to TCGA mRNA expression data with Ωπ​8 and Ωπ​9, inferring transcription factor regulatory networks. Unlike PC and GES, which required partition-and-merge strategies due to scalability limits, SCOPE operated on the full dataset and achieved substantially higher rates of biologically validated forward edges and two-step paths. The forward-to-reverse ratio for TF → target edge identification was 1.77 for SCOPE, as compared to 1.13–1.32 for PC and GES, with a 2–5x increase in externally validated associations.
Practical and Theoretical Implications
The relaxation of the SP objective to the support level enables scalable MEC recovery, avoiding the combinatorial bottleneck of ordering search and the computational weaknesses of CI testing or dense likelihood optimization. The sparse-Cholesky pipeline is amenable to parallelization and distributed evaluation, further expanding its applicability to large-scale genomics, neuroscience, and socio-economic systems. The mask-based feasibility property offers robustness to misspecification and is a flexible foundation for extensions to interventions and latent variable models.
Future developments may focus on local ordering search in the ReSP context, parallelized evaluation pipelines, and adaptation to settings with measurement noise or incomplete data. The modularity of SCOPE facilitates integration with advanced sparse precision estimation and screening techniques, potentially enhancing statistical power for causal discovery at scale.
Conclusion
The Relaxed Sparsest-Permutation formulation and the SCOPE pipeline significantly improve scalability for causal structure learning in high-dimensional linear SEMs, retaining strong theoretical recovery guarantees and empirical accuracy. The shift from exact factorization to support-level screening and sparse triangular factors offers a practical, robust, and theoretically sound approach to MEC recovery on large graphs, broadening the scope of structure discovery in computational statistics and artificial intelligence (2605.05568).