Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Radio Stripe-Based Distributed ISAC System with Dynamic Sensing-Communication Reconfiguration

Published 10 Apr 2026 in eess.SP | (2604.08982v1)

Abstract: Integrated sensing and communications (ISAC) has emerged as an intrinsic service of upcoming 6G wireless systems, enabling the reuse of communication signals for environmental sensing and supporting context-aware network functionalities. Meanwhile, the evolution of the wireless infrastructure toward distributed systems creates new opportunities for collaborative sensing from spatially separated nodes. Motivated by this trend, this work investigates a radio stripe aided ISAC system as a low-complexity implementation of a distributed system. We study the trade-off between achievable sum rate and sensing precision when downlink signals are used for target localization within the service area. By exploiting the architectural homogeneity of the radio stripes transceivers, each unit can be dynamically configured to operate in either communication or sensing mode. We formulate a targets localization problem considering the measurements of multiple sensing-communication configurations. Due to the large number of measurements and the continuity of the search space, we propose discretizing the service are and then solve the estimation problem in batches. The targets are finally estimated using a fusion strategy. Our results show that increasing the number devices and sensing APUs boosts sensing precision at the expense of degrading the sum rate. The latter remains constant for a given number of communication APUs regardless of their positions. Moreover, changing the number of antennas reveals a non-monotonic impact on sensing performance due to the trade-off between array gain and illumination uniformity.

Summary

  • The paper presents a novel radio stripe-based ISAC system with dynamic reassignments of antenna processing units to enhance both sensing and communication performance.
  • It employs a consensus ADMM approach for distributed sparse scene reconstruction, enabling scalable target localization over a discretized 2D area.
  • Numerical results demonstrate trade-offs between improved sensing precision and reduced communication sum-rate, underscoring the need for optimal antenna role allocation.

Radio Stripe-Based Distributed ISAC with Dynamic Sensing-Communication Reconfiguration

Introduction and Motivation

The work analyzes a radio stripe-based architecture for distributed integrated sensing and communication (ISAC), motivated by trends in 6G communication infrastructure toward native ISAC support. It specifically targets the deployment of antenna processing units (APUs) arranged as “radio stripes.” Each APU can be dynamically assigned to either a communication or sensing role, and the paper explores the system-level implications of this configurability for downlink-based multi-static sensing and target localization.

The proposed framework leverages spatial separation of APUs for distributed multi-static radar-like sensing and multi-user OFDMA for communications, with role assignments dynamically optimized for various trade-offs. The authors introduce a batch-based, discretized formulation of the target localization problem and address its computational complexity by adopting a consensus-based distributed reconstruction and fusion approach. Figure 1

Figure 1: Schematic of the radio stripe-based ISAC system, with APUs dynamically assigned to communication or sensing roles and devices served via OFDMA.

System Model and Problem Formulation

The authors define a model where DD single-antenna users are served by CC communication APUs (each with MM antennas) while SS APUs act as distributed sensors. Assignment of communication and sensing roles among C+SC+S APUs is dynamically configurable, providing N=(C+SC)N=\binom{C+S}{C} possible configurations.

The focus is on reconstructing the positions and reflectivities of LL unknown targets within a 2D service area based on multi-static measurements accrued via various APU role assignments. The forward model incorporates multi-APU distributed illumination and sensing, with the received signal at each sensing APU capturing reflections induced by communication APUs.

The underlying estimation problem is non-convex due to the nonlinear dependence on unknown target locations and the volume of multi-static observations. A direct solution is computationally infeasible given increased dimensionality as both the number of APUs and deployment area grow.

Consensus-Based Scene Reconstruction and Fusion

To address complexity, the service area is discretized onto an II-point grid, and for each APU role assignment, a compressed sensing-based linear inverse problem reconstructs a sparse scene vector. The system is modeled as a set of coupled measurement equations (one per sensing APU) sharing a common underlying scene but subject to local measurement noise and diversity.

The scene reconstruction problem is cast as a consensus 1\ell_1-regularized minimization, formulated for solution with the consensus ADMM (alternating direction method of multipliers). Each sensing APU solves a local inverse problem, subject to the constraint that all local solutions agree on a global scene estimate. This structure enables scalability and parallelization.

Final fusion across all role assignments is performed via a weighted average of normalized scene estimates, with weights reflecting solution residuals. This process refines the reflectivity map and target localization by aggregating spatial, spectral, and geometric diversity provided by the APUs’ dynamic roles.

Numerical Results: Sensing-Communication Trade-Offs

Key experimental results show the influence of APU assignments and system parameters on both sensing precision and achievable communication rates.

  • Scene Reconstruction Quality: Increasing the number of served devices significantly enhances target reconstruction due to improved illumination diversity across the service area. Figure 2

    Figure 2: Scene reconstruction quality for different numbers of devices; more devices yield higher fidelity due to improved spatial illumination.

  • Fusion Performance: Average sensing precision in fused images improves as the number of devices and sensing APUs increases, but this comes at the expense of sum-rate performance because more APUs are reallocated to sensing. Figure 3

    Figure 3: Average precision (reflectivity map accuracy) in fused images as a function of the number of devices, for M=4M=4.

  • Pareto Analysis of Sensing vs. Rate: The sum-rate remains largely determined by the number of communication APUs and is insensitive to their specific positions, while sensing precision depends more on which APUs are assigned to sensing and their configuration. Figure 4

    Figure 4: The trade-off between average sensing precision and average sum-rate for various APU configurations.

  • Antenna Number Effects: Sensing precision as a function of antennas per APU (CC0) is non-monotonic. Initially, increased array size improves angular resolution and gain, but beyond some point, excessive directivity reduces illumination uniformity, degrading reconstruction. At sufficiently high CC1, the array gain compensates, restoring performance. Figure 5

    Figure 5: Average precision in fused reflectivity maps versus number of antennas per APU, showing the non-monotonic effect.

Implications and Potential Research Directions

The paper provides several insights relevant for ISAC system deployments:

  • Dynamic Role Reconfiguration: The ability to dynamically reassign APU roles enables situational and context-driven optimization—trading communication throughput for improved sensing/scene awareness as needed. This adaptability is essential under non-stationary conditions or in use cases (e.g., smart buildings, industrial IoT) where environmental perception is intermittently prioritized.
  • Scalability and Complexity: The proposed consensus-based distributed algorithm provides a tractable computational pathway for large-scale system inference. However, scalability to very dense deployments or hierarchical, multi-region architectures may require further methodological advances, such as model reduction or online adaptation.
  • Optimal Role Allocation: While the work illustrates key properties of random or uniform assignments, the development of learning-based or utility-aware role scheduling policies may further exploit spatial and contextual heterogeneity for enhanced ISAC performance.
  • Practical Limitations: The analysis assumes ideal phase synchronization and perfect OFDMA channelization. Real-world systems may experience residual synchronization errors, mutual coupling, or non-ideal channel estimation, which could degrade both sensing and communication metrics. Extending the framework to incorporate such effects remains an open research topic.

Conclusion

This paper rigorously addresses the architecture, algorithm, and trade-offs emerging from dynamic communication-sensing reconfiguration in distributed radio stripe-based ISAC systems (2604.08982). Through theoretical analysis and comprehensive simulation, it demonstrates that increasing the number of sensing APUs and communication devices improves sensing precision but imposes strict trade-offs on achievable communication sum-rate. Non-monotonic effects in antenna configuration reveal that optimal system design must simultaneously consider array gain, coverage uniformity, and role allocation. These insights are fundamental for future 6G networks seeking to deeply integrate distributed sensing within the communications infrastructure, and they motivate continued investigation into scalable, context-adaptive ISAC system designs.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.