Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

The effect of staggered nonlinearity on the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model

Published 1 Apr 2026 in cond-mat.mes-hall, cond-mat.other, and quant-ph | (2604.00895v1)

Abstract: We investigate the spectral properties of the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model with sublattice-dependent onsite nonlinearity. Two complementary approaches are employed in our studies. First, Bloch state solutions under periodic boundary conditions are assumed to enable semi-analytical treatment, which allows us to obtain the system's energy band structure and further derive a general expression of the Zak phase that incorporates nonlinearity-induced correction (referred to as nonlinear Zak phase). This analysis reveals that, at sufficiently high nonlinearities, a nonlinearity-induced topological phase transition occurs, marked by a discontinuity in the nonlinear Zak phase. The second approach amounts to numerically obtaining other (non-Bloch) solutions under open boundary conditions, employing the Self-Consistent Field Iterative Method. Its main results include the observation of an edge state's energy that is independent of a nonlinear parameter, a persisting band touching point that only shifts in the presence of perturbations reminiscent of Weyl points in a Weyl semimetal, as well as delocalized solutions that persist even at extreme nonlinearity strengths. These findings illuminate the rich interplay between topology and nonlinearity in lattice models with potential realization in optical/acoustic waveguide settings.

Authors (2)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that staggered sublattice nonlinearities induce novel topological phase transitions and incomplete, looped energy bands.
  • It employs a self-consistent field method and Bloch ansatz to reveal parameter-dependent band evolution, gap closures, and emergence of wave-packet states.
  • The work highlights that controlled edge state manipulation and the persistence of delocalized solutions have practical implications for photonic and quantum applications.

The Impact of Sublattice-Dependent Nonlinearity on the SSH Model

Introduction

This study systematically analyzes the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model under sublattice-dependent onsite nonlinearities, introducing independent nonlinear coefficients gAg_A and gBg_B for the two sublattices. The standard SSH model, foundational in the context of 1D topological systems, captures the essential features of topological phase transitions and edge state formation in a minimal lattice. While its topological character is well classified by bulk invariants such as the Zak phase, it inherently describes a non-interacting system. Exploration of nonlinear extensions, motivated by effective mean-field descriptions of interacting systems or implementations with intrinsic nonlinear physical effects such as photonic Kerr media, provides both practical and theoretical insights. This work extends uniform nonlinear SSH studies by allowing for staggered nonlinearities, resulting in a broader phenomenology and a richer parameter space.

Hamiltonian and Problem Formulation

The model is governed by a nonlinear, state-dependent tight-binding Hamiltonian defined as: H(ψ)=m=1N1(J22σ+mm+1+h.c.)+m=1N[J1σx+(gAψA,m20 0gBψB,m2)+vσz]mm\mathcal{H}(\psi) = \sum_{m=1}^{N-1} \left( \frac{J_2}{2} \sigma_+ \otimes |m\rangle \langle m+1| + \text{h.c.} \right) +\sum_{m=1}^N \left[J_1 \sigma_x + \begin{pmatrix} g_A |\psi_{A,m}|^2 & 0 \ 0 & g_B |\psi_{B,m}|^2 \end{pmatrix} + v \sigma_z \right]\otimes |m\rangle \langle m| where J1J_1, J2J_2 are intra- and inter-cell hopping amplitudes, vv an onsite potential, and gAg_A, gBg_B are the sublattice-dependent nonlinearities.

The study addresses both periodic boundary conditions (PBC, Bloch solutions) and open boundary conditions (OBC, numerically determined spatial profiles) to elucidate bulk and edge physics. Analytical reductions are performed under the Bloch ansatz; general solutions employ a self-consistent field (SCF) iterative method.

Energy Band Structure and Incomplete Bands

Under the Bloch ansatz, the nonlinear eigenproblem reduces to a self-consistency problem for effective Bloch spinors. The spectrum for each quasimomentum kk is determined by numerically solving a quartic equation for relevant projectors; physical roots are used to reconstruct the energy bands. As nonlinearity strength increases, the number of real solutions varies, leading to incomplete energy bands that form closed loop structures in the EEgBg_B0 plane. These phenomena are not present in linear systems and signal the breakdown of the conventional band structure concept. Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 2: Nonlinear energy band evolution versus quasimomentum for increasing gBg_B1 at fixed gBg_B2; emergence and expansion of loop-like band segments are apparent.

The region supporting four real energy bands expands with nonlinearity until, above a critical value, all gBg_B3 points admit four solutions. At special values, the upper three bands merge, and a gap closure occurs, indicating a topological phase transition driven by nonlinearity rather than single-particle Hamiltonian tuning. Figure 3

Figure 4: Energy spectrum versus gBg_B4 at fixed gBg_B5, all gBg_B6; phase transition is marked by a closure of the upper bands.

Nonlinear Zak Phase and Topological Characterization

To characterize topology in the presence of nonlinearity, a generalized Zak phase expression is derived, incorporating state-dependent geometric contributions. This nonlinear Zak phase, unlike the conventional (linear) Zak phase, encodes properly the geometric and topological features in the presence of mean-field nonlinear corrections. Numerical evaluation shows that the nonlinear Zak phase exhibits discontinuous jumps at the nonlinear critical points—the hallmark of a topological phase transition. Figure 5

Figure 1: Nonlinear (thick curves) and conventional (thin curves) Zak phases versus gBg_B7; both display discrete jumps at the transition but only the nonlinear Zak phase retains quantization and physical meaning in the nonlinear regime.

This formalism confirms that nonlinearity modifies the location and even existence of topological phase transitions, and that only the nonlinear Zak phase tracks these transitions accurately in the generalized SSH model.

Dynamical Stability

The stability of the nonlinear eigenstates is assessed via linearization of the nonlinear eigenproblem (Bogoliubov-de Gennes analysis), yielding a non-Hermitian stability matrix gBg_B8 whose spectrum determines dynamical stability. The analysis finds that conventional (outer) bands are generically dynamically stable, while bands associated with loop structures are unstable. Instability also emerges in the vicinity of the nonlinear-induced transition points, particularly near regions of band touching, further emphasizing the nontrivial impact of nonlinearity on both spectral and dynamical properties.

Real Space Results: Edge States, Band Touching, and Delocalized Solutions

Under OBC and direct diagonalization via SCF, the localization properties of energy eigenstates are mapped as parameters gBg_B9 and H(ψ)=m=1N1(J22σ+mm+1+h.c.)+m=1N[J1σx+(gAψA,m20 0gBψB,m2)+vσz]mm\mathcal{H}(\psi) = \sum_{m=1}^{N-1} \left( \frac{J_2}{2} \sigma_+ \otimes |m\rangle \langle m+1| + \text{h.c.} \right) +\sum_{m=1}^N \left[J_1 \sigma_x + \begin{pmatrix} g_A |\psi_{A,m}|^2 & 0 \ 0 & g_B |\psi_{B,m}|^2 \end{pmatrix} + v \sigma_z \right]\otimes |m\rangle \langle m|0 are varied independently. Notably, edge states' energies remain highly sensitive only to the nonlinearity on their own sublattice; for large H(ψ)=m=1N1(J22σ+mm+1+h.c.)+m=1N[J1σx+(gAψA,m20 0gBψB,m2)+vσz]mm\mathcal{H}(\psi) = \sum_{m=1}^{N-1} \left( \frac{J_2}{2} \sigma_+ \otimes |m\rangle \langle m+1| + \text{h.c.} \right) +\sum_{m=1}^N \left[J_1 \sigma_x + \begin{pmatrix} g_A |\psi_{A,m}|^2 & 0 \ 0 & g_B |\psi_{B,m}|^2 \end{pmatrix} + v \sigma_z \right]\otimes |m\rangle \langle m|1, the left edge state's energy is unaffected by H(ψ)=m=1N1(J22σ+mm+1+h.c.)+m=1N[J1σx+(gAψA,m20 0gBψB,m2)+vσz]mm\mathcal{H}(\psi) = \sum_{m=1}^{N-1} \left( \frac{J_2}{2} \sigma_+ \otimes |m\rangle \langle m+1| + \text{h.c.} \right) +\sum_{m=1}^N \left[J_1 \sigma_x + \begin{pmatrix} g_A |\psi_{A,m}|^2 & 0 \ 0 & g_B |\psi_{B,m}|^2 \end{pmatrix} + v \sigma_z \right]\otimes |m\rangle \langle m|2 and vice versa. This suggests potential utility for localized state manipulation or quantum information applications leveraging spatially resolved nonlinear controls. Figure 6

Figure 6

Figure 3: Real space energy spectrum versus H(ψ)=m=1N1(J22σ+mm+1+h.c.)+m=1N[J1σx+(gAψA,m20 0gBψB,m2)+vσz]mm\mathcal{H}(\psi) = \sum_{m=1}^{N-1} \left( \frac{J_2}{2} \sigma_+ \otimes |m\rangle \langle m+1| + \text{h.c.} \right) +\sum_{m=1}^N \left[J_1 \sigma_x + \begin{pmatrix} g_A |\psi_{A,m}|^2 & 0 \ 0 & g_B |\psi_{B,m}|^2 \end{pmatrix} + v \sigma_z \right]\otimes |m\rangle \langle m|3, illustrating robust behavior of edge state energies.

A further crucial finding concerns the persistence and shifting of gapless band-touching points (nodal points) under strong staggered nonlinearity, which only shift (not annihilate) under symmetry-breaking perturbations (H(ψ)=m=1N1(J22σ+mm+1+h.c.)+m=1N[J1σx+(gAψA,m20 0gBψB,m2)+vσz]mm\mathcal{H}(\psi) = \sum_{m=1}^{N-1} \left( \frac{J_2}{2} \sigma_+ \otimes |m\rangle \langle m+1| + \text{h.c.} \right) +\sum_{m=1}^N \left[J_1 \sigma_x + \begin{pmatrix} g_A |\psi_{A,m}|^2 & 0 \ 0 & g_B |\psi_{B,m}|^2 \end{pmatrix} + v \sigma_z \right]\otimes |m\rangle \langle m|4): these are reminiscent of the Weyl points in semimetals, indicating a form of momentum-space topology induced and stabilized by nonlinearity.

Delocalized solutions can surprisingly survive for extremely large nonlinearity amplitudes when H(ψ)=m=1N1(J22σ+mm+1+h.c.)+m=1N[J1σx+(gAψA,m20 0gBψB,m2)+vσz]mm\mathcal{H}(\psi) = \sum_{m=1}^{N-1} \left( \frac{J_2}{2} \sigma_+ \otimes |m\rangle \langle m+1| + \text{h.c.} \right) +\sum_{m=1}^N \left[J_1 \sigma_x + \begin{pmatrix} g_A |\psi_{A,m}|^2 & 0 \ 0 & g_B |\psi_{B,m}|^2 \end{pmatrix} + v \sigma_z \right]\otimes |m\rangle \langle m|5 and H(ψ)=m=1N1(J22σ+mm+1+h.c.)+m=1N[J1σx+(gAψA,m20 0gBψB,m2)+vσz]mm\mathcal{H}(\psi) = \sum_{m=1}^{N-1} \left( \frac{J_2}{2} \sigma_+ \otimes |m\rangle \langle m+1| + \text{h.c.} \right) +\sum_{m=1}^N \left[J_1 \sigma_x + \begin{pmatrix} g_A |\psi_{A,m}|^2 & 0 \ 0 & g_B |\psi_{B,m}|^2 \end{pmatrix} + v \sigma_z \right]\otimes |m\rangle \langle m|6 have opposite signs and similar magnitudes, a sharply contrasting behavior to the uniform nonlinearity case. This demonstrates that the nonlinear interplay between attractive and repulsive interactions on the lattice can maintain extended states in regimes where all states become solitonic in the uniform case.

Wave-Packet State and Bulk-Edge Correspondence Modification

At large nonlinearity strengths, highly oscillatory states—here termed "wave-packet" (WP) solutions—emerge. These evolve from linear bulk Bloch states and localize near edges or create effective "nonlinear edges" in the system, dependent on the effective nonlinear potential landscape induced by their own profile. Such WP states exist in both topologically trivial and nontrivial regimes and exhibit sensitivity to the parameters H(ψ)=m=1N1(J22σ+mm+1+h.c.)+m=1N[J1σx+(gAψA,m20 0gBψB,m2)+vσz]mm\mathcal{H}(\psi) = \sum_{m=1}^{N-1} \left( \frac{J_2}{2} \sigma_+ \otimes |m\rangle \langle m+1| + \text{h.c.} \right) +\sum_{m=1}^N \left[J_1 \sigma_x + \begin{pmatrix} g_A |\psi_{A,m}|^2 & 0 \ 0 & g_B |\psi_{B,m}|^2 \end{pmatrix} + v \sigma_z \right]\otimes |m\rangle \langle m|7, H(ψ)=m=1N1(J22σ+mm+1+h.c.)+m=1N[J1σx+(gAψA,m20 0gBψB,m2)+vσz]mm\mathcal{H}(\psi) = \sum_{m=1}^{N-1} \left( \frac{J_2}{2} \sigma_+ \otimes |m\rangle \langle m+1| + \text{h.c.} \right) +\sum_{m=1}^N \left[J_1 \sigma_x + \begin{pmatrix} g_A |\psi_{A,m}|^2 & 0 \ 0 & g_B |\psi_{B,m}|^2 \end{pmatrix} + v \sigma_z \right]\otimes |m\rangle \langle m|8, and H(ψ)=m=1N1(J22σ+mm+1+h.c.)+m=1N[J1σx+(gAψA,m20 0gBψB,m2)+vσz]mm\mathcal{H}(\psi) = \sum_{m=1}^{N-1} \left( \frac{J_2}{2} \sigma_+ \otimes |m\rangle \langle m+1| + \text{h.c.} \right) +\sum_{m=1}^N \left[J_1 \sigma_x + \begin{pmatrix} g_A |\psi_{A,m}|^2 & 0 \ 0 & g_B |\psi_{B,m}|^2 \end{pmatrix} + v \sigma_z \right]\otimes |m\rangle \langle m|9.

Implications and Future Directions

This study establishes that sublattice-dependent nonlinearity in the SSH model fundamentally alters the landscape of band topology, edge state formation, and the stability/robustness of states. Nonlinearity redefines the phase diagram, drives topological phase transitions inaccessible in the linear regime, and enables new control protocols for edge states via local nonlinear parameter variation. The results point toward the capacity for engineering topologically protected, stable, or manipulable localized states in nonlinear photonic, acoustic, or cold atom realizations where such SSH-type arrangements are feasible.

Open theoretical avenues include:

  • Nonlinear bulk-boundary correspondence and its failure/modification in the strong nonlinear limit.
  • Existence and interpretation of higher-order nonlinear nodal points.
  • Extensions to higher dimensions, synergy with non-Hermitian and Floquet (time-periodic) effects as methods to further enrich the nonlinear topological phases.
  • The practical implementation of localized state control for quantum information tasks.

Conclusion

The introduction of sublattice-dependent, staggered nonlinearity into the SSH model generates a myriad of novel phenomena including incomplete/looped energy bands, nonlinear-induced topological phase transitions, parameter-selective edge state manipulation, and the persistence of delocalized solutions under extreme nonlinearity. The nonlinear Zak phase provides the correct invariant for distinguishing nontrivial topology in these systems. The interplay between topology and nonlinearity fundamentally enriches the SSH phase diagram, promising avenues for both fundamental condensed matter investigations and technology applications in nonlinear metamaterials and waveguide arrays.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.