Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Charged Black Holes in Bumblebee gravity with Global Monopole: Thermodynamics and Shadow

Published 1 Apr 2026 in gr-qc and hep-th | (2604.00883v1)

Abstract: In this paper, we perform a detailed study of the thermodynamic properties of a charged black hole in bumblebee gravity in the presence of a global monopole. We also analyze the optical characteristics of this black hole solution, highlighting the influence of Lorentz symmetry violation and the global monopole on the black hole shadow. Furthermore, we examine the trajectories of both photons and test particles in this spacetime, showing how the geometric parameters alter their paths. Moreover, we study the dynamics of neutral test particles, with particular attention to the location of the innermost stable circular orbits (ISCOs). Finally, we investigate massless scalar perturbations and derive bounds on the greybody factors, illustrating how the black hole's geometric parameters affect field propagation, energy emission, and radiation sparsity in this background.

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that a Lorentz-violating vector field and a global monopole induce significant modifications in black hole horizon structure and thermodynamics.
  • It employs a modified Reissner–Nordström metric and WKB methods to analyze changes in entropy, Hawking temperature, and photon sphere characteristics.
  • Results indicate that increasing Lorentz violation and monopole strength enlarge the photon sphere, shift orbital stability thresholds, and affect Hawking flux.

Charged Black Holes in Bumblebee Gravity with Global Monopole: Thermodynamics and Shadow

Introduction and Motivation

The paper "Charged Black Holes in Bumblebee gravity with Global Monopole: Thermodynamics and Shadow" (2604.00883) presents a comprehensive analysis of charged black hole solutions in the Lorentz-violating Bumblebee gravity framework, augmented by a global monopole defect. The work addresses both thermodynamic and optical signatures, and connects them with the geodesic structure and wave propagation phenomena in these nonstandard backgrounds. The presence of a global monopole introduces an angular deficit into the metric, fundamentally altering asymptotic properties, while the Bumblebee sector breaks Lorentz invariance via a vector field acquiring a vacuum expectation value. The authors focus on how these geometric modifications, together with electric charge, deform horizon structure, energy emission, shadow observables, and the local dynamics of test particles and fields.

Metric Structure and Horizon Properties

The Lorentz-violating and monopole-augmented Reissner–Nordström-like metric is characterized by a deformation governed by two parameters: the Lorentz-violating parameter ℓ\ell and the monopole parameter η\eta. The metric function f(r)f(r) is modified to encapsulate both the conical asymptotics and the charge scale deformation.

The horizon structure is analyzed via the roots of f(r)f(r), which shift in response to both ℓ\ell and η\eta. Notably, in parameter ranges studied, two horizons are generically present, with the monopole field increasing the event horizon radius via the solid-angle deficit. Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1: Metric function f(r)f(r) for various ℓ\ell and η\eta, demonstrating the shift in horizon locations with fixed Q=0.8Q=0.8.

Thermodynamics

Extensive calculations of horizon entropy, Hawking temperature, ADM mass, Gibbs free energy, and specific heat are presented. Entropy is directly influenced by the conical deficit, scaling as η\eta0 with η\eta1. The surface gravity and Hawking temperature acquire corrections dependent on both η\eta2 and η\eta3.

The Hawking temperature exhibits the typical non-monotonic behavior of charged black holes, with η\eta4 decreasing the temperature peak and η\eta5 introducing milder shifts. Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Hawking temperature η\eta6 versus horizon radius η\eta7, highlighting monotonic and non-monotonic regimes across parameter space.

The ADM mass and Gibbs free energy curves show prominent deformation with increasing η\eta8 and η\eta9, reducing the mass and thermodynamic potential compared to standard scenarios. Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3: ADM mass f(r)f(r)0 dependence on f(r)f(r)1, illustrating suppression with increased Lorentz violation and monopole strength.

Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4: Gibbs free energy f(r)f(r)2 as a function of radius, showing monotonic parameter response without signal of phase transition.

Specific heat analysis reveals a divergence, marking the onset of local instability and phase transition. The critical point moves nontrivially with both geometric parameters. Figure 5

Figure 5

Figure 5: Specific heat f(r)f(r)3 profile, with divergence boundary separating stable and unstable thermodynamic branches.

Optical Characteristics: Photon Sphere and Shadow Structure

The null geodesics in the equatorial plane are studied, yielding an effective potential that governs photon capture and escape. The photon sphere radius and shadow size are derived analytically and numerically, with both f(r)f(r)4 and f(r)f(r)5 expanding the photon sphere and thus enlarging the shadow, i.e., both diminish gravitational focusing due to metric deformation. Figure 6

Figure 6

Figure 6: Null effective potential f(r)f(r)6 for various parameters, with extrema indicating photon sphere location.

Figure 7

Figure 7: Photon-sphere radius f(r)f(r)7 map across f(r)f(r)8, providing insight into the joint influence of Lorentz violation and monopole field.

Parametric shadow diagrams demonstrate that, while the shadow remains circular, its radius increases with both parameters. Figure 8

Figure 8: Shadow radius response for fixed f(r)f(r)9, across f(r)f(r)0 and f(r)f(r)1.

Observational constraints using EHT data on Sgr~Af(r)f(r)2 restrict the parameters: typically f(r)f(r)3 and f(r)f(r)4, with stronger charge requiring tighter bounds. Figure 9

Figure 9: Normalized shadow radius f(r)f(r)5 versus f(r)f(r)6, overlaying EHT constraints to identify allowed parameter regimes.

Photon Trajectories and Weak Lensing

Photon paths are solved in the weak-field limit, and the finite-distance Gauss–Bonnet method is applied to derive the deflection angle. The topological conical deficit and Lorentz-violating corrections appear explicitly; both parameters increase the weak lensing angle. Figure 10

Figure 10

Figure 10: Weak deflection angle f(r)f(r)7 as a function of impact parameter for variable geometric deformations.

Dynamics of Test Particles and ISCO Structure

Analysis of timelike geodesics establishes the corrections to perihelion precession and ISCO structure. Both f(r)f(r)8 and f(r)f(r)9 are found to elevate orbit energy and angular momentum, and shift the ISCO outward, thus reducing effective gravitational binding. Figure 11

Figure 11

Figure 11: Specific angular momentum squared â„“\ell0 profiles, minima linked to ISCO transition.

Figure 12

Figure 12

Figure 12: Specific energy squared â„“\ell1, showing elevation with parameter increase and approach to asymptotic plateau.

Azimuthal angular velocity decreases with both parameters at fixed radius, consistent with suppressed gravitational attraction. Figure 13

Figure 13

Figure 13: Azimuthal angular velocity â„“\ell2 responses, with slower orbital motion for enlarged â„“\ell3.

Perturbative Sector: Scalar Field and Quasinormal Modes

Scalar wave propagation is treated via Klein-Gordon equation, yielding an effective potential with peaked barrier governed by â„“\ell4 and â„“\ell5. The barrier height and location shift substantially with parameter variation. Figure 14

Figure 14

Figure 14: Scalar potential profile for fixed â„“\ell6 and â„“\ell7, displaying barrier shift trends.

QNMs are calculated using WKB methods. The real (oscillation) and imaginary (damping) parts of frequency exhibit strong dependence:

  • â„“\ell8 decreases with both LV and GM parameters.
  • â„“\ell9 shows non-monotonic dependence: initial decrease, then increase in magnitude, signifying complex changes in damping rate and radiative stability. Figure 15

    Figure 15: QNM frequency components as functions of η\eta0 for fixed η\eta1, demonstrating suppression and non-monotonicity.

    Figure 16

    Figure 16: QNM components versus η\eta2 for fixed η\eta3, revealing similar suppression interplay.

Greybody Factors, Energy Emission Rate, and Radiation Sparsity

Greybody factors, computed via semi-analytic WKB bounds, demonstrate that η\eta4 enhances the curvature barrier (lowering transmission at low η\eta5), while η\eta6 reduces it (raising transmission). Reflection decreases with both at high frequency. Figure 17

Figure 17

Figure 17: Transmission coefficient η\eta7, with suppression/enhancement trends depending on parameters.

Figure 18

Figure 18

Figure 18: Reflection coefficient η\eta8, demonstrating parameter-linked reduction.

Energy emission rate profile exhibits peak position and height as a function of geometric parameters, controlled by both Hawking temperature and shadow radius. Figure 19

Figure 19: Energy emission rate over η\eta9, with emission peak encoding thermal and optical interplay.

Sparsity parameter quantifies temporal separation of Hawking quanta: increases with both f(r)f(r)0 and f(r)f(r)1, signifying more intermittent emission. Figure 20

Figure 20: Normalized sparsity parameter f(r)f(r)2, illustrating how deviations from Schwarzschild yield more sparse radiation.

Conclusion

The analysis in (2604.00883) offers a multi-faceted characterization of charged black holes in Bumblebee gravity with a global monopole. Deformations from Lorentz violation and topological defects induce significant departures from standard black hole physics in thermodynamics, shadow radius, orbital stability, radiative profiles, and photon/geodesic dynamics. These results not only constrain parameter ranges using event horizon imaging, but also generate explicit predictions for Hawking flux and QNM frequencies in strong gravity regimes.

Future extensions should include rotational generalizations, continued QNM analysis, and further observational tests against black hole imaging and gravitational wave data to probe Lorentz-violating and topologically nontrivial gravity in astrophysical contexts.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 3 likes about this paper.