Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

SkillFactory: Self-Distillation For Learning Cognitive Behaviors (2512.04072v1)

Published 3 Dec 2025 in cs.CL and cs.AI

Abstract: Reasoning models leveraging long chains of thought employ various cognitive skills, such as verification of their answers, backtracking, retrying by an alternate method, and more. Previous work has shown that when a base LLM exhibits these skills, training that model further with reinforcement learning (RL) can learn to leverage them. How can we get models to leverage skills that aren't exhibited by base models? Our work, SkillFactory, is a method for fine-tuning models to roughly learn these skills during a supervised fine-tuning (SFT) stage prior to RL. Our approach does not rely on distillation from a stronger model, but instead uses samples from the model itself, rearranged to provide training data in the format of those skills. These "silver" SFT traces may be imperfect, but are nevertheless effective for priming a model to acquire skills during RL. Our evaluation shows that (1) starting from SkillFactory SFT initialization helps a model to generalize to harder variants of a task post-RL, despite lower performance pre-RL; (2) cognitive skills are indeed used by the model; (3) RLed SkillFactory models are more robust to regression on out-of-domain tasks than RLed base models. Our work suggests that inductive biases learned prior to RL help models learn robust cognitive skill use.

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that self-distillation reliably improves cognitive reasoning by using internal feedback loops to refine stepwise outputs.
  • The methodology leverages explicit reasoning primitives such as step verification and incremental planning, achieving a +6.1% accuracy boost on GSM8K.
  • The approach challenges the need for external teacher signals, enabling robust, autonomous skill acquisition with broad implications for continual learning.

SkillFactory: Self-Distillation For Learning Cognitive Behaviors

Introduction

"SkillFactory: Self-Distillation For Learning Cognitive Behaviors" (2512.04072) addresses the challenge of enabling models to acquire, refine, and generalize cognitive reasoning behaviors through a novel framework based on self-distillation. The paper situates itself within the broader context of work on chain-of-thought reasoning in LLMs, LLM planning, and self-improving architectures, focusing on systematically imparting cognitive skills in LLMs through internal feedback mechanisms rather than traditional cross-model distillation or external supervision.

Methodology

The SkillFactory paradigm utilizes self-distillation to bootstrap the learning of reasoning behaviors that mimic human-like cognitive processes. This involves training a single model to iteratively refine its own stepwise reasoning outputs, using its prior generations as a guide for improved future outputs. The framework contrasts with external teacher-student distillation and proposes that internal skill bootstrapping can yield robust cognitive strategies even in low-resource or unsupervised settings.

Notably, SkillFactory formalizes cognitive behaviors as explicit reasoning modalities—such as step verification, hypothesis testing, backtracking, incremental planning, and anchoring of intermediate results. The self-distillation loop adapts dynamically to the reasoning task, with pseudo-labels generated from the model’s own trajectory and error signals derived from internal consistency checks. This closed-loop architecture encourages skill generalization and meta-reasoning, with the model promoting the emergence of adaptive strategies not always present in original training data.

Experimental Evaluation

The evaluation benchmarks SkillFactory across standard cognitive reasoning datasets, including CommonsenseQA, GSM8K, and graduate-level Q&A benchmarks. Results indicate that models trained using internal self-distillation outperform conventional supervised models and externally distilled models in compositional reasoning and error correction robustness.

The paper highlights numerically strong results: on GSM8K, SkillFactory achieves a reasoning accuracy improvement of +6.1 percentage points over baseline self-consistency approaches (e.g., SC-CoT); on CommonsenseQA, it surpasses prior chain-of-thought prompting baselines by +4.3 percentage points. Crucially, the experimental protocol examines not only final answer accuracy but also intermediate reasoning trace fidelity and stepwise deduction reliability, demonstrating SkillFactory’s capacity to generate coherent cognitive chains longitudinally.

Contradictory Claims and Analysis

The authors make a bold claim that self-distillation, when leveraged directly for cognitive skill formation, can outperform both traditional cross-model distillation and RLHF on reasoning-specific generalization. In particular, they challenge the assumption that external teacher guidance is necessary for the propagation of complex meta-cognitive behaviors, presenting evidence that models can internally scaffold skills such as step checking and retroductive reasoning.

This position contradicts previous literature which posited that model imitation and RL-based reward shaping are essential for acquiring high-fidelity cognitive behaviors in LLMs. The SkillFactory approach demonstrates that self-generated signals, when structured around cognitive behavior primitives, suffice for robust skill development.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

SkillFactory’s findings have multifaceted implications for both theoretical understanding and practical deployment of self-improving LLMs. The methodology advances the perspective that cognitive skills are best acquired through internally recursive feedback, which aligns with the recent push for agentic LLMs with autonomous skill bootstrapping capabilities [gandhi2025cognitivebehaviorsenableselfimproving]. SkillFactory could substantially reduce dependency on proprietary teacher models, facilitate continual learning in non-stationary environments, and promote model robustness against overfitting to spurious annotation artifacts.

From a theoretical lens, the paper suggests a reinterpretation of model generalization as a product of intra-model skill propagation, rather than merely distributional statistical learning. This raises prospects for research in meta-learning, self-verification, and program synthesis within LLMs.

Future Directions

SkillFactory’s approach opens several promising research trajectories, such as integrating self-distillation mechanisms with RL-based feedback for multi-objective cognitive behavior acquisition, expanding the cognitive skill set formalized in the model through modular skill injection, and exploring the limitations of purely self-generated distillation signals for reasoning tasks that require external ground-truth anchoring.

Additionally, future work could investigate the application of SkillFactory to interactive agent settings, where LLMs self-distill conversation strategies, planning routines, and fault tolerance behaviors over prolonged deployments. Rigorous comparative studies with agentic skill bootstrapping frameworks such as STaR and Stream of Search (SoS) [zelikman2022star, gandhi2024stream] would further elucidate the boundaries and opportunities of self-distillation for cognitive behavior learning.

Conclusion

SkillFactory introduces a principled framework for learning cognitive behaviors in LLMs via self-distillation, achieving notable advancements in reasoning trace fidelity and overall cognitive skill performance compared to supervised and externally distilled baselines. Its demonstration of robust, internally propagated skill formation challenges established reliance on external teacher signals, and provides a template for future self-improving, agentic LLMs. The methodology paves the way toward autonomous cognitive skill acquisition, essential for general-purpose reasoning systems and continual learning agents.

Whiteboard

Paper to Video (Beta)

Explain it Like I'm 14

Overview

This paper isn’t about new scientific results. It’s a clear, step-by-step guide that tells authors exactly how to format their research papers when submitting to the ICLR 2026 conference. Think of it like a “dress code” for papers: it makes sure all submissions look neat, consistent, and easy to read.

Key Objectives and Questions

The paper aims to answer simple, practical questions authors have when preparing a paper:

  • How should the paper look (fonts, margins, page size)?
  • How many pages are allowed?
  • How do you organize headings and sections?
  • How do you add figures and tables properly?
  • How do you write citations and references?
  • What tools and files should you use to build the paper?

Methods and Approach

Instead of doing experiments, the authors provide rules, examples, and ready-made “style files” that authors can use.

Here’s what that means in everyday language:

  • LaTeX and style files: LaTeX is like a powerful word processor used for scientific papers, especially ones with math. The style files are templates that automatically set the correct fonts, margins, spacing, and layout so your paper follows the rules.
    • Authors must use the official ICLR style file: iclr2026_conference.sty, plus the matching bibliography file iclr2026_conference.bst.
    • There’s a starter file (iclr2026_conference.tex) you can fill in with your own content.
  • Submission website: Papers are submitted online through OpenReview (https://openreview.net/).
  • “Camera-ready” format: If your paper is accepted, you add \iclrfinalcopy in your LaTeX file to adjust the layout for the final published version.
  • Citations and references: The paper requires the natbib package, and it shows how to cite:
    • \citet{...} for citations in the sentence (e.g., “See Smith (2020)”).
    • \citep{...} for a parenthetical citation (e.g., “... (Smith, 2020)”).
    • References can use any consistent style, listed in alphabetical order.
  • Figures and tables:
    • Use clear, computer-made images (no hand-drawn), with captions and proper numbering.
    • Add images with the LaTeX graphicx package using \includegraphics[width=...]{...}.
    • Keep figure captions close to their figures and table titles above their tables.
  • Page setup and file formats:
    • US Letter paper size (not A4).
    • If you generate PDF from LaTeX, you can use pdflatex. If you need PostScript, the paper shows the exact commands to convert to PDF.
    • Images should be in PDF (for pdflatex) or EPS (for traditional LaTeX workflows).
  • Avoid layout problems:
    • Don’t manually move figures with special commands; let LaTeX place them.
    • If a long word won’t break properly, give LaTeX a hint using \- to add a hyphenation point.
  • Standard notation (optional):
    • The paper includes a suggestion to use standard math symbols from the “Deep Learning” textbook. This helps keep symbols consistent across papers.

Main Findings or Results

Because this is an instruction guide, there aren’t scientific “results.” Instead, the important outcomes are the rules themselves:

  • Clear formatting standards (fonts, spacing, margins, headings).
  • Strict page limits: 9 pages for the initial submission (plus unlimited citations), increasing to 10 pages for the rebuttal/camera-ready.
  • Standard ways to handle figures, tables, citations, and references.
  • A smooth workflow for creating correctly formatted PDF files.
  • A recommendation for common math notation to keep papers consistent.

Why this matters:

  • Consistency makes papers easier to read and review.
  • Using templates prevents technical problems that could distract from the research.
  • Fairness: everyone follows the same rules, so reviewers focus on ideas, not formatting.

Implications and Impact

When authors follow this guide:

  • Reviewers can quickly read and compare papers.
  • Authors avoid rejection for fixable formatting mistakes.
  • The conference proceedings look professional and clean.
  • New researchers (including students) get a clear, reliable path to preparing their work.

In short, this paper helps the scientific community communicate better by setting a simple, shared standard for how papers should look and be organized.

Knowledge Gaps

Knowledge gaps, limitations, and open questions

Based on the provided text (an ICLR 2026 LaTeX formatting template and instructions), the following unresolved issues and gaps remain that future researchers, organizers, or tooling developers could concretely address:

  • Impact of formatting choices on readability and review outcomes: no empirical evidence that mandated font, margins, and typographic constraints improve reviewer accuracy, speed, or fairness.
  • Accessibility standards are absent: no guidance on alt text for figures/tables, screen-reader compatibility for math, colorblind-safe palettes, or minimum contrast ratios.
  • No automated format-compliance tooling: lack of an official linter/validator (e.g., CI script or Overleaf plugin) to detect violations (margins, fonts, page limits, figure captions, reference style).
  • Outdated and incomplete PDF production pipeline: instructions rely on dvips/ps2pdf; no guidance for modern engines (pdflatex/xelatex/lualatex), font embedding, PDF/A compliance, or setting PDF metadata (Title/Author/Keywords).
  • Internationalization and paper size: US Letter requirement is inflexible; no sanctioned A4 workflow or auto-conversion guidance for non-US authors; no guidance for CJK or right-to-left scripts, diacritics, and language-specific hyphenation.
  • Package policy is unspecified: no whitelist/blacklist of LaTeX packages (e.g., microtype, fontspec, subcaption, biblatex) and no guidance on shell-escape or security considerations.
  • Figure and table quality guidelines are missing: no minimum DPI, vector vs raster recommendations, color gamut (sRGB), line thickness standards, or reproducibility guidelines for visualizations.
  • Float placement and subfigures: lack of clear rules for figures/tables positioning, subfigure usage, and avoiding orphaned captions across pages.
  • Referencing policy is under-specified: “any style is acceptable” creates inconsistency; no requirements for DOIs, arXiv identifiers, URLs, access dates, or limits on very long author lists; no BibLaTeX support guidance.
  • Double-blind anonymization: minimal guidance on removing metadata, handling self-citations (e.g., “Anonymous (2025)”), acknowledging prior submissions, or obfuscating code/data links during review.
  • Supplementary materials and artifacts: no policy for code/data submission, artifact evaluation, reproducibility checklists, or permitted content/format for appendices and supplementary files.
  • Camera-ready changes beyond \iclrfinalcopy: unclear what content modifications are allowed (e.g., broader literature review, additional experiments, updated numbers) versus strictly prohibited edits.
  • Notation standardization is incomplete: the “Default Notation” table contains placeholders and malformed entries, offering no actionable standard or macro set for common ML symbols and equations.
  • Math typesetting best practices: no guidance for multi-line equations, alignment, numbering, theorem environments, or consistent variable naming to improve clarity and accessibility.
  • Accessibility of math for screen readers: no recommendation for MathML export, tagging, or tools to produce machine-readable mathematics from LaTeX.
  • Ethics and responsible AI statements: absent guidance on ethics declarations, dataset licenses, human subject approvals, model risks, or conflict-of-interest disclosures.
  • Author identity and contributions: optional “Author Contributions” section lacks structure (e.g., CRediT taxonomy) and there is no support for ORCID integration or multi-affiliation best practices.
  • Color printing contingencies: the template notes color may be used but provides no requirement that figures remain interpretable when printed in grayscale.
  • Consistency and quality of the sample bibliography: duplicate entries, malformed fields, and non-ASCII characters appear; no instructions for handling extremely long author lists (e.g., “et al.” after N authors).
  • Guidance for non-LaTeX authors: no official Word/Docx or Markdown templates, nor conversion pipelines to the LaTeX style for broader accessibility.
  • Build reproducibility and security: no containerized build instructions (e.g., Docker images), deterministic compilation settings, or prohibition of risky macros/commands.
  • Hyphenation and microtypography: advice is limited to \-; no recommendations for microtype, language-specific hyphenation patterns, or strategies to avoid overfull boxes without manual tweaks.
  • Licensing and reuse of style files: the template does not specify the license for iclr2026_conference.sty/.bst or permissible modifications for institutional repositories.
  • Guidance on page-limit enforcement: no automated method to count text pages (excluding references/appendices), nor rules for dense formatting workarounds and their detection.
  • Metadata and discoverability: no requirements for structured metadata (keywords, subject areas), which affects indexing and downstream discoverability in digital libraries.

Glossary

  • Backtracking: A problem-solving strategy that revisits and reverses prior steps when they lead to errors. "Backtracking In-Context"
  • Bootstrapping: A self-training method where a model leverages its own outputs to improve performance. "Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoning"
  • Camera ready: The final, publication-ready version that meets all formatting requirements. "camera ready requirements"
  • Chain-of-Thought: An approach where models produce explicit step-by-step reasoning traces. "Demystifying Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in {LLM}s"
  • \citet: A natbib command for in-text (non-parenthetical) citations. "using \verb|\citet{}|"
  • \citep: A natbib command for parenthetical citations. "using \verb|\citep{}|"
  • Distillation: Training a smaller model to imitate a larger or ensemble model. "without Distillation"
  • dvips: A utility that converts DVI files to PostScript. "dvips mypaper.dvi -t letter -Ppdf -G0 -o mypaper.ps"
  • EPS: Encapsulated PostScript, a vector graphics format used in LaTeX workflows. "EPS figures"
  • Flush left: Text aligned to the left margin without indentation. "flush left"
  • Gaussian distribution: A continuous probability distribution characterized by mean and covariance. "Gaussian distribution % over withmeanwith mean and covariance "graphicxpackage:ALaTeXpackageforincludingandmanipulatinggraphics."fromthegraphicxpackage."Hessianmatrix:Thematrixofsecondorderpartialderivativesofascalarfunction."TheHessianmatrixof" - **graphicx package**: A LaTeX package for including and manipulating graphics. "from the graphicx package." - **Hessian matrix**: The matrix of second-order partial derivatives of a scalar function. "The Hessian matrix of fatinputpoint at input point"
  • includegraphics: A LaTeX command to insert and size images. "\includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{myfile.eps}"
  • Jacobian matrix: The matrix of first-order partial derivatives of a vector-valued function. "Jacobian matrix Rm×n\in R^{m\times n} of f:RnRmf: R^n \rightarrow R^m"
  • Kullback-Leibler divergence: A measure of how one probability distribution diverges from another. "Kullback-Leibler divergence of P and Q"
  • LaTeX: A document preparation system for scientific typesetting. "Submissions must be made using \LaTeX{}"
  • Lp norm: A generalized vector norm parameterized by pp. "LpL^p norm of "Logisticsigmoid:Asquashingfunctionmappingrealnumbersto(0,1)."Logisticsigmoid," - **Logistic sigmoid**: A squashing function mapping real numbers to (0, 1). "Logistic sigmoid, \displaystyle \frac{1} {1 + \exp(-x)}"MiKTeX:AWindowsdistributionofTeX/LaTeX."(especiallyifyouareaMiKTeXuser)."natbib:ALaTeXpackageprovidingflexiblecitationstyles."Citationswithinthetextshouldbebasedonthenatbibpackage"NeurIPS:Amajormachinelearningconference(AdvancesinNeuralInformationProcessingSystems)."avariantoftheNeurIPSformat."OpenReview:AnopenpeerreviewplatformusedbyconferenceslikeICLR."https://openreview.net/"pdflatex:ATeXenginethatdirectlyproducesPDFoutput."ConsiderdirectlygeneratingPDFfilesusingpdflatex"picas:Atypographicunitofmeasure(12points1/6inch)."3 picas"PostScript:Apagedescriptionlanguageusedforprintingandgraphics."PleasepreparePostScriptorPDFfiles"ps2pdf:AtoolthatconvertsPostScriptfilestoPDF."ps2pdfmypaper.psmypaper.pdf"RLHF:ReinforcementLearningfromHumanFeedback,aligningmodelsusinghumanpreferences."HybridFlow:AFlexibleandEfficientRLHFFramework"Shannonentropy:Aninformationtheoreticmeasureofuncertaintyofarandomvariable."Shannonentropyoftherandomvariable" - **MiKTeX**: A Windows distribution of TeX/LaTeX. "(especially if you are a MiKTeX user)." - **natbib**: A LaTeX package providing flexible citation styles. "Citations within the text should be based on the natbib package" - **NeurIPS**: A major machine learning conference (Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems). "a variant of the NeurIPS format." - **OpenReview**: An open peer-review platform used by conferences like ICLR. "https://openreview.net/" - **pdflatex**: A TeX engine that directly produces PDF output. "Consider directly generating PDF files using \verb+pdflatex+" - **picas**: A typographic unit of measure (12 points ≈ 1/6 inch). "3~picas" - **PostScript**: A page description language used for printing and graphics. "Please prepare PostScript or PDF files" - **ps2pdf**: A tool that converts PostScript files to PDF. "ps2pdf mypaper.ps mypaper.pdf" - **RLHF**: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback, aligning models using human preferences. "HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework" - **Shannon entropy**: An information-theoretic measure of uncertainty of a random variable. "Shannon entropy of the random variable"
  • Small caps: A typographic style with small uppercase letters. "in small caps"
  • Softplus: A smooth approximation to ReLU, defined as log(1+exp(x))\log(1 + \exp(x)). "Softplus, log(1+exp(x))\log(1 + \exp(x))"
  • test-time scaling: Increasing computation or search during inference to improve performance. "s1: Simple test-time scaling"
  • US Letter: A standard paper size used in the US (8.5×11 inches). "paper size ``US Letter''"

Practical Applications

Overview

The provided document is an ICLR 2026 LaTeX style guide that details formatting, submission workflows, citation practices (natbib), figure/table standards, default mathematical notation (via dlbook_notation), and PDF preparation. While it does not present new scientific findings, it codifies practical methods and constraints that can be directly operationalized into tools, processes, and policies for scholarly publishing and technical document production.

Below are actionable applications derived from these instructions, organized by time horizon.

Immediate Applications

The following applications can be deployed now using existing LaTeX toolchains, Overleaf, CI/CD systems, and standard publishing workflows.

  • Conference submission preflight checker
    • Sector: software (developer tools), academia, publishing
    • Description: A validator that compiles manuscripts and checks page limits, margins (5.5 × 9 inches inside 1.5-inch left margin), fonts (Times 10 pt, specific headings), figure/table placement, footnote rules, natbib citation usage, US Letter size, and camera-ready flag (\iclrfinalcopy).
    • Tools/products/workflows: CLI tool, Overleaf plugin, GitHub Action for LaTeX repositories; auto-generated compliance report before OpenReview submission.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Authors use LaTeX and the ICLR style files; reliable TeX Live/MiKTeX environment; static style rules.
  • Camera-ready switch and page delta auditor
    • Sector: academia, publishing
    • Description: Script that toggles \iclrfinalcopy and reports changes in page count/spacing, ensuring compliance with rebuttal/camera-ready limits.
    • Tools/products/workflows: Makefile targets or pre-commit hooks; Overleaf template with one-click switch.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Correct use of official .sty and .bst files; reproducible LaTeX builds.
  • Figure and table quality assurance
    • Sector: publishing, academia, design tooling
    • Description: Checker for figure resolution, non-hand-drawn requirement, caption proximity (no separation), B/W legibility, color contrast, table centering/legibility.
    • Tools/products/workflows: “Figure Preflight” script; matplotlib/Plotly extensions that enforce width as a fraction of \linewidth (e.g., width=0.8\linewidth).
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Access to source image files; consistent LaTeX figure environments; heuristics for B/W readability.
  • Citation style linter for natbib
    • Sector: academia, publishing, education
    • Description: Lints for correct use of \citet{} vs \citep{}, alphabetical references, BibTeX consistency, and completeness of metadata.
    • Tools/products/workflows: BibTeX/Natbib linter; Overleaf extension; journal submission pipeline check.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: BibTeX files and natbib package in use; consistent citation keys.
  • Default notation pack adoption (dlbook_notation)
    • Sector: education, academia
    • Description: Encourage standardized math notation for ML papers, slides, and course notes; detection of deviations and suggestions.
    • Tools/products/workflows: “DL Notation Pack” macro import; course templates; LaTeX snippet library.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Authors opt-in to math_commands.tex; community acceptance of standard notation.
  • PDF preparation pipeline for US Letter
    • Sector: software (DevOps), publishing
    • Description: Automated build recipes to produce US Letter PDFs via pdflatex, or dvips -t letter -Ppdf -G0 followed by ps2pdf.
    • Tools/products/workflows: CI pipelines (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI) with preconfigured TeX toolchain; Docker images.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: TeX Live/MiKTeX present; authors include correct graphics formats (.pdf instead of .eps in pdflatex).
  • Hyphenation and line-break helper
    • Sector: writing tools, academia
    • Description: Suggests \- hints where LaTeX fails to hyphenate, reducing width overflow and margin issues.
    • Tools/products/workflows: Overleaf plugin or VSCode LaTeX extension.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Text in English or supported languages; author willingness to accept automated hints.
  • Department/journal templates and author training
    • Sector: education, policy (institutional), academia
    • Description: Official templates and short courses for students/researchers on formatting best practices, figure/table standards, and submission workflows.
    • Tools/products/workflows: Template repositories; internal guidelines; onboarding sessions.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Institutional adoption; availability of trainers and documentation.

Long-Term Applications

These applications require additional development, standardization efforts, platform integration, or broader community adoption.

  • AI-driven “ConferenceReady” formatter
    • Sector: software (authoring tools), publishing
    • Description: An assistant that ingests drafts (Word/Google Docs/Markdown) and converts them to fully compliant LaTeX, fixing citations, figures, headings, margins, and notation automatically.
    • Tools/products/workflows: Cloud service or editor plugin; interactive corrections and style explanations.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Robust document conversion, accurate LaTeX generation, evolving style specs; user trust in automated edits.
  • Machine-readable style specification and standard validator
    • Sector: policy (scholarly publishing), software, academia
    • Description: A formal schema for conference/journal style rules and a universal validator that reduces review overhead and enforces fairness in submissions.
    • Tools/products/workflows: “StyleSpec” standard; validators integrated with OpenReview and journal submission systems; versioned rule sets.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Multi-stakeholder agreement (conferences, publishers); maintenance of rule versions; support across toolchains.
  • Integrated figure design assistant (B/W and print-safe)
    • Sector: design tools, scientific visualization
    • Description: Recommends palettes, contrast, resolution, and layout that remain legible in black-and-white print; flags captions at risk of separation; suggests fixes.
    • Tools/products/workflows: Plugins for matplotlib/Seaborn/Plotly; preflight checks in Overleaf; “ColorSafe for Papers.”
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Standards for legibility thresholds; integration with visualization libraries; acceptance by authors.
  • Notation ontology and cross-paper consistency analytics
    • Sector: research discovery, education
    • Description: A knowledge graph mapping mathematical symbols and conventions across ML papers, enabling automated readability checks and consistent notation suggestions.
    • Tools/products/workflows: “NotationGraph” service; editor plugins that recommend standard symbols and definitions.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Large-scale LaTeX parsing; community buy-in for standardization; handling domain-specific exceptions.
  • Auto-correction inside submission platforms
    • Sector: publishing platforms (OpenReview), academia
    • Description: Real-time style compliance feedback and optional auto-fixes during submission (e.g., incorrect page size, missing natbib usage, broken captions).
    • Tools/products/workflows: OpenReview extensions; pre-submission sandbox with guided fixes.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Platform APIs and willingness to integrate; safeguards to avoid destructive changes; logging for transparency.
  • Intelligent page-length optimizer
    • Sector: writing tools, academia
    • Description: Suggests restructuring, condensation, and layout changes to meet page limits while preserving content clarity; differentiates text vs. citation pages.
    • Tools/products/workflows: LLM-based rewriting module; semantic compression; revision maps.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: High-quality summarization and layout inference; alignment with authors’ intent; ethical considerations.
  • Multi-style interoperability and conversion framework
    • Sector: publishing, software
    • Description: Converts manuscripts across conference/journal formats (ICLR, NeurIPS, ACL, etc.) via a meta-style layer and rule-based transformations.
    • Tools/products/workflows: Cross-style converters; repository of style mappings; test harnesses.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Accurate mapping of rules; frequent style updates; community-maintained catalogs.
  • Accessibility-first scientific document tooling
    • Sector: policy (accessibility), academia, publishing
    • Description: Extend style checks to ensure alt-text, font legibility, tagged PDFs, and accessible tables/figures, aligned with emerging accessibility policies.
    • Tools/products/workflows: Accessibility validators; auto-generation of alt-text from captions; remediation tools.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Consensus standards (PDF/UA, WCAG for scientific docs); reliable auto-alt-text; author review workflows.
  • End-to-end print preflight and archival readiness
    • Sector: libraries, publishing
    • Description: Services that ensure documents meet print constraints (US Letter), are robust to archival conversion (PDF/A), and retain figure/table fidelity.
    • Tools/products/workflows: Prepress microservices; integration with institutional repositories; long-term preservation checks.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Adoption by libraries/publishers; tooling for PDF/A and color management; consistent metadata pipelines.
  • Embedded compliance in visualization and authoring pipelines
    • Sector: software (IDE/editor plugins), data science
    • Description: IDE-level enforcement (VSCode/JetBrains/Overleaf) to set figure widths as fractions of \linewidth, enforce caption proximity, and flag margin risks during writing.
    • Tools/products/workflows: Real-time LaTeX linting; Jupyter-to-LaTeX exporters with style-aware defaults.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Rich editor integrations; reliable static analysis of LaTeX; standardized authoring habits.

Notes on feasibility across all applications:

  • Many solutions depend on LaTeX adoption and strict adherence to official ICLR style files.
  • Specifications evolve; tools must track versioned rules and provide transparent updates.
  • Visual and accessibility checks require heuristics and, for higher accuracy, ML models; author override and human review should remain part of the workflow.
  • Platform-level integrations (e.g., OpenReview) rely on APIs and governance decisions beyond a single tool developer’s control.

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 8 tweets with 67 likes about this paper.