Quantum Gravity, de Sitter Space, and Normalizability (2511.05417v1)
Abstract: We propose a resolution to the longstanding problem of perturbative normalizability in canonical quantum gravity of the Lorentzian Chern-Simons-Kodama (CSK) state with a positive cosmological constant in four dimensions. While the CSK state is an exact solution to the Hamiltonian constraint in the self-dual formulation and semiclassically describes de Sitter spacetime, its physical viability has been questioned due to apparent nonnormalizability and CPT asymmetry. Starting from a nonperturbative holomorphic inner product derived from the reality conditions of the self-dual Ashtekar variables, we show that the linearization, in terms of gravitons, of the CSK state is perturbatively normalizable for super-Planckian cosmological constant. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a rotation in phase space, a generalization of Thiemann's complexifier, can render the full perturbative state normalizable for all $\Lambda$ by analytically continuing the non-convergent modes in phase space. This provides the first concrete realization of a CPT-breaking, yet normalizable, gravitational vacuum state rooted in a nonperturbative quantum gravity framework. Our results establish the CSK state-long thought formal-as a viable candidate for the ground state of quantum gravity in de Sitter space.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Explain it Like I'm 14
Overview
This paper tackles a long-standing puzzle in quantum gravity: can a particular “vacuum” state of the universe, called the Chern‑Simons‑Kodama (CSK) state, be treated as physically meaningful? The CSK state is an elegant math solution that describes a universe like ours when it’s dominated by dark energy (a “de Sitter” universe). But many physicists worried it wasn’t acceptable because it seemed impossible to give it a proper probability (it looked “non‑normalizable”), and it appeared to break a fundamental symmetry called CPT. The authors show that, when you measure it the right way, the CSK state can actually be well‑behaved—and they offer a method to fix remaining problems.
Key Questions
The paper asks, in simple terms:
- Is the CSK state a valid “ground state” (lowest‑energy state) for quantum gravity in a universe with positive dark energy?
- Can we define its probability sensibly (make it normalizable) when we use the correct rules for quantum gravity?
- If it still misbehaves for some situations, is there a safe mathematical trick to fix it without breaking physics?
What They Did (Methods in Everyday Language)
To understand their approach, it helps to know a few ideas:
- Think of a quantum “state” like a description of all possible ways the universe could be. To be physically meaningful, its total probability must add up to 1. That’s what “normalizable” means.
- How you add up probabilities depends on the “inner product,” which is like the rulebook for measuring sizes of quantum states. Using the wrong rulebook can make a perfectly fine state look infinite or nonsensical.
- In this area of gravity, scientists use special variables (Ashtekar’s self‑dual variables) that make some quantities complex numbers. That’s okay, but then you must use a matching, special inner product (a “holomorphic” one) so the math reflects real, physical spacetime.
Here’s their strategy, with simple analogies:
- Use the right measuring tool: They base their work on a holomorphic inner product that comes from “reality conditions” (rules ensuring the complex math still describes a real universe). Analogy: if you wear the right glasses, a blurry picture becomes sharp.
- Test small ripples: They look at tiny waves in spacetime (gravitons) around a smooth, expanding universe (de Sitter space). Analogy: check whether small ripples on a calm lake behave well.
- Expand carefully: They “linearize” (zoom in on small fluctuations) and compute how the correct inner product weighs each ripple. This tells them if the overall probability stays finite.
- Surgical fix for problem ripples: For cases where some ripples still misbehave, they apply a “rotation in phase space” (a careful mathematical turn called Thiemann’s complexifier/Wick rotation). Analogy: rotate your coordinate grid so a tilted ellipse lines up with the axes, making it easy to handle. They only rotate the troublesome modes and leave the good ones alone.
They also draw an analogy to a standard quantum system (the harmonic oscillator with coherent states): sometimes a state looks non‑normalizable if you use a naïve measure, but becomes perfectly normal with the correct one. Same lesson here.
Main Findings and Why They Matter
- With the correct inner product, the CSK state’s small ripples (gravitons) are normalizable when the cosmological constant Λ is extremely large—bigger than the Planck scale (super‑Planckian). This shows the state can serve as a proper vacuum for quantum gravity in that regime.
- For smaller Λ, the state splits into “good” and “bad” modes: some are normalizable, some aren’t. However, the authors show that a targeted rotation in phase space (a generalization of Thiemann’s method) can flip just the problematic modes so the whole state becomes normalizable.
- This provides the first concrete example of a gravitational vacuum that:
- is rooted in a non‑perturbative (foundational) quantum gravity framework,
- is perturbatively well‑defined (the small‑ripple theory is healthy),
- can break CPT symmetry yet still be mathematically acceptable (finite norm).
Why this matters:
- The CSK state was long viewed as “beautiful but unphysical.” These results rehabilitate it as a serious candidate for the ground state of quantum gravity in a de Sitter universe.
- It offers a clear, consistent way to talk about gravitons (the quantum of gravitational waves) on a de Sitter background using canonical (Hamiltonian) methods.
Implications and Potential Impact
- A viable vacuum for quantum gravity: Having a well‑defined ground state is a cornerstone for building a complete quantum theory of gravity. This work suggests the CSK state can play that role in a universe with positive dark energy, like ours.
- New path for quantum cosmology: It strengthens approaches that use Ashtekar’s variables and holomorphic methods, encouraging fresh studies of the early universe (where Λ might have been large) and inflationary physics.
- Possible fingerprints: Because the CSK state can break CPT in a controlled way, it could hint at subtle, testable signatures—such as a difference between left‑ and right‑handed gravitational waves. While the paper doesn’t make observational claims, it motivates looking for such effects.
- Reframing a classic objection: What once seemed “non‑normalizable” was, in part, a matter of using the wrong measuring stick. With the right inner product—and, when needed, a careful phase‑space rotation—the state behaves.
In short: the paper argues that the CSK state, long dismissed, can be made mathematically sound and physically meaningful. That’s a big step toward a consistent picture of quantum gravity in an accelerating universe.
Knowledge Gaps
Knowledge gaps, limitations, and open questions
Below is a consolidated list of concrete gaps and unresolved issues that emerge from the paper’s assumptions, approximations, and scope. These are framed to be actionable for follow-up research.
- Holomorphic inner product rigor
- Provide a rigorous derivation of the nonperturbative holomorphic inner product beyond the approximation [dE] ≈ [de], including the correct Jacobian from densitization, measure factors, and a precise definition of the functional integral domain.
- Prove positivity, completeness, and uniqueness (up to unitary equivalence) of the proposed inner product, and clarify the status and impact of its non-unique integral representations given the overcomplete basis.
- Demonstrate that the inner product consistently implements the reality conditions only on the physical Hilbert space (after solving constraints), rather than by postulating them as operator identities on the full kinematic Hilbert space.
- Gauge fixing, ghosts, and determinants
- Quantify the effect of gauge fixing to the TTS sector on the functional measure: explicitly compute the Faddeev–Popov determinants (even in the abelianized linearized setting) and show they are truly field-independent and do not modify the conclusions.
- Regularize and define the functional determinants in the measure (det(∧d_{Re A})) with a clear, background-covariant prescription (e.g., heat kernel, ζ-function, or Pauli–Villars) and show scheme-independence of physical conclusions.
- Regularization dependence and the constant α
- The key quadratic measure correction depends on a divergent constant α fixed by a subtraction (α = −1/16). Assess the dependence of normalizability claims on the regularization scheme and subtraction prescription; identify scheme-invariant statements or renormalized parameters controlling the threshold for convergence.
- Completeness beyond quadratic order
- Extend the analysis beyond quadratic order in the perturbations by computing higher-order terms in the expansion of S(Re A) and including S_CS3 and higher in the wavefunctional; check whether interactions reintroduce non-normalizable behavior or modify the convergence domain.
- Verify that the perturbative series for the inner product exponent actually converges (or is Borel summable) in a controlled sense around de Sitter.
- Mode-by-mode analytic continuation (complexifier)
- Provide an explicit construction of the “mode-by-mode Wick rotation” (Thiemann’s complexifier generalization) at field-theoretic level: specify the generator, its domain, canonical properties, and its action on all modes including constraints.
- Prove that the complexifier map preserves the Hamiltonian, diffeomorphism, and Gauss constraints (i.e., maps physical to physical states) and does not introduce anomalies or violate locality or microcausality.
- Establish that the analytic continuation yields a positive, finite norm for sub-Planckian Λ robustly across regularizations and operator orderings.
- Dependence on operator ordering and sector choice
- Quantify how the normalizability depends on the EEF ordering and the choice of self-dual vs anti-self-dual (or mixed) action; explore whether other orderings or sectors change which modes are normalizable, and whether any ordering yields scheme-independent results.
- Background and slicing dependence
- Test robustness under different de Sitter slicings (global S3, static patch) and boundary conditions; address δ3(0) artifacts and large-volume limits by working in compact spatial slices with well-defined boundary terms.
- Generalize beyond de Sitter: analyze perturbations around Minkowski (Λ → 0), anti–de Sitter (Λ < 0), and slow-roll quasi–de Sitter backgrounds; determine whether the method extends and what replaces the “super-Planckian” criterion.
- IR/UV behavior of the norm
- Characterize infrared behavior near k → 0 in the combined measure × CSK quadratic form; determine whether additional IR regulators or finite-volume treatments are required and how they affect normalizability.
- Assess ultraviolet robustness of the result when higher-derivative operators or quantum gravity corrections are included in the effective action.
- Large gauge transformations and topology
- Address the known issue that the CS functional shifts under large gauge transformations; determine whether the gravitational CSK state is well-defined (or needs level quantization) on topologically nontrivial spatial manifolds and how the holomorphic inner product treats topological sectors.
- Clarify whether normalizability survives summing over topological sectors and large-gauge inequivalent configurations.
- Reality conditions and torsion
- The analysis enforces real connection perturbations (torsionless sector) to recover GR; reconcile this with the earlier assertion that quantizing S_SD naturally includes torsion fluctuations and clarify whether torsionful modes are projected out or must be integrated over in the inner product.
- Extend the inner product and normalizability analysis to include fermions, where torsion is sourced, and determine whether the conclusions persist with matter couplings.
- CPT breaking and physical consistency
- Provide a precise statement of how CPT is broken (which transformation(s) fail) in the CSK state under the proposed inner product, and ensure compatibility with general requirements of locality and unitarity in curved spacetime.
- Explore whether a CPT-symmetric alternative (e.g., superposition of CSK and its conjugate) can be constructed and normalized in the same framework; compare physical predictions.
- Physical observables and predictions
- Compute graviton two-point functions and chiral spectra derived from the normalized CSK state with the holomorphic measure; quantify parity/chirality signatures and assess observational implications (e.g., primordial GW chirality).
- Determine whether the CSK state with the new inner product reproduces the Bunch–Davies vacuum correlators (or deviates in a controlled way) and in what parameter regime.
- Constraint implementation and hermiticity
- Show explicitly that the Hamiltonian, Gauss, and diffeomorphism constraints are self-adjoint (or have appropriate adjoints) with respect to the holomorphic inner product, and that the physical Hilbert space obtained by solving them is nontrivial and complete.
- Clarify the relation between this inner product and group averaging/refined algebraic quantization; ensure no anomalies in the constraint algebra.
- Relation to LQG and Immirzi parameter
- Connect the construction to the real Ashtekar–Barbero variables and loop quantization (including the Immirzi parameter); determine whether the complexifier used here aligns with LQG complexifier flows and q-deformed structures known for the Kodama state.
- Investigate whether spin-network representations admit an analog of this holomorphic inner product and whether the CSK state can be embedded consistently in the LQG Hilbert space.
- Λ scale and physical relevance
- The “super-Planckian Λ” normalizability regime is unphysical for our universe. Quantify precisely the critical Λ (or H) for convergence, and evaluate whether the complexifier-based continuation for realistic sub-Planckian Λ is robust and unique.
- Analyze the Λ → 0 limit: does the norm remain finite or does the state become singular? Identify a well-defined flat-space limit, if any.
- Time dependence and Schrödinger picture consistency
- Ensure consistency of the time dependence (use of conformal time and time-dependent mode functions) with a Schrödinger-picture wavefunctional and a time-independent inner product; clarify how the proposed norm is preserved under evolution.
- Nonperturbative status
- Provide evidence or a strategy for a fully nonperturbative definition of the norm in the self-dual theory (e.g., via lattice/discretized approximations or constructive field theory) and determine whether the perturbative conclusions survive beyond linearization.
- Boundary terms and asymptotics
- Specify boundary conditions and treat boundary contributions to S_CS and to the inner product measure; determine whether boundary (or horizon) degrees of freedom in de Sitter affect normalizability.
- Comparison to alternative cosmological wavefunctions
- Compare quantitatively with Hartle–Hawking and tunneling proposals: identify whether the holomorphic inner product yields equivalent or distinct predictions and whether hybrid constructions (e.g., CPT-symmetric combinations) can be normalized.
These items delineate where additional derivations, proofs, generalizations, or explicit computations are needed to elevate the proposed framework from a promising perturbative construction to a robust, background- and scheme-independent quantum-gravitational vacuum proposal.
Practical Applications
Overview
Below are practical applications that can emerge from the paper’s findings on the holomorphic inner product for self-dual Ashtekar variables, the perturbative normalizability of the Chern–Simons–Kodama (CSK) state around de Sitter space, and the use of a phase-space complexifier/Wick rotation to tame divergent modes. Applications are grouped into immediate and long-term, and each item notes relevant sectors, potential tools/workflows, and key assumptions or dependencies that affect feasibility.
Immediate Applications
- Rigorous normalization workflows for wavefunctionals in overcomplete (holomorphic) representations
- Sector: academia (theoretical and mathematical physics), software
- What: Practical procedures to evaluate norms in non-self-adjoint (holomorphic) representations, avoiding naïve inner products that misdiagnose “nonnormalizability.”
- Tools/workflows:
- Software modules that implement holomorphic inner products derived from reality conditions (e.g., Python/Julia libraries, Mathematica packages).
- Templates for functional-measure construction and operator-trace evaluation (e.g., symbolic + numeric pipelines for Tr log determinants and regularization).
- Assumptions/dependencies:
- The holomorphic inner product proposed is valid and equivalent to other admissible forms that satisfy the reality conditions.
- Users are working in representations where overcompleteness is common (e.g., coherent-state/Bargmann-like settings).
- Mode-by-mode phase-space complexifier (generalized Wick rotation) for handling divergent perturbative sectors
- Sector: academia (QFT, quantum gravity, condensed matter theory), software
- What: A regularization strategy that analytically continues only non-convergent modes, preserving constraints and rendering perturbative states normalizable.
- Tools/workflows:
- Symbolic-numeric routines to identify and rotate problematic modes while keeping physical constraints intact (Gauss, diffeomorphism, Hamiltonian).
- “Selective analytic continuation” plugins for perturbation theory toolchains.
- Assumptions/dependencies:
- The rotation preserves the constraint algebra and does not introduce anomalies.
- The procedure generalizes beyond linear order for specific models of interest.
- Benchmarking and pedagogy using a tractable quantum-gravity vacuum in de Sitter
- Sector: academia (education, research training)
- What: Use the CSK state (normalizable at super-Planckian Λ and perturbatively normalizable with complexifier methods) as a testbed in courses and tutorials on canonical quantization and cosmology.
- Tools/workflows:
- Teaching modules with explicit linearization around de Sitter in Ashtekar variables (TTS gauge), code notebooks illustrating measure construction, mode expansions.
- Assumptions/dependencies:
- Educational focus; no direct physical inference about our Universe’s Λ (which is sub-Planckian).
- Cross-disciplinary cautionary principle for overcomplete bases
- Sector: industry (machine learning, signal processing), academia (applied math)
- What: Methodological guidance—norms and “divergence” assessments in overcomplete dictionaries depend on the correct measure; naïve inner products can mislead.
- Tools/workflows:
- Validation steps for norm computations in non-orthonormal bases (e.g., sparse coding, coherent-state transforms).
- Assumptions/dependencies:
- The analogy holds at the level of normalization principles; domain-specific measures must be properly specified (no direct physics-to-ML mapping without care).
- Functional determinant and trace-evaluation tooling
- Sector: software (computational physics), academia
- What: Reusable routines to compute and regularize functional determinants and traces for measures (e.g., Tr ln operators), including momentum-space kernels and TTS gauge projections.
- Tools/workflows:
- HPC-enabled libraries for operator inversion on constrained subspaces; regularization strategies (e.g., momentum cutoffs, analytic subtraction of divergences).
- Assumptions/dependencies:
- Gauge choice dependence and regularization scheme (e.g., the constant α) must be transparent and configurable.
Long-Term Applications
- Cosmological tests of CPT-breaking gravitational vacua
- Sector: academia (cosmology, astrophysics), policy (research funding and experiment prioritization), industry (instrumentation)
- What: If the CSK state is a viable gravitational vacuum with CPT asymmetry, predict and test parity-violating signatures:
- Chiral gravitational waves (left/right asymmetry), nonzero TB/EB cross-correlations in CMB polarization, parity-odd bispectra, and GW birefringence.
- Tools/workflows:
- Forecasting pipelines for experiments (LiteBIRD, CMB-S4, Simons Observatory, LISA, ground-based GW detectors) to constrain parity/CPT violation.
- End-to-end cosmological parameter estimation incorporating CPT-violating templates.
- Assumptions/dependencies:
- The phase-space rotation yields a fully normalizable CSK state at sub-Planckian Λ without breaking other constraints.
- The CPT-breaking features survive beyond perturbation theory and couple to observable sectors at detectable levels.
- Early-Universe initial-state selection for inflation and quantum cosmology
- Sector: academia (theoretical cosmology), software
- What: Use CSK-derived vacua to define initial conditions for inflationary perturbations, exploring impacts on spectra, non-Gaussianity, and mode chirality.
- Tools/workflows:
- Initial-state modules for Boltzmann codes (e.g., CLASS/CAMB extensions) that allow parity-violating graviton sectors.
- Analytical/numerical studies of mode evolution from holomorphic inner-product-based vacua.
- Assumptions/dependencies:
- Robust extension of normalizability and reality conditions to the full nonlinear theory.
- Consistent matching to standard cosmological epochs and observables.
- Quantum computing and simulation of constrained, non-Hermitian systems
- Sector: industry (quantum technologies), academia (quantum information)
- What: Translate holomorphic inner-product techniques and selective analytic continuation into quantum algorithms for simulating constrained systems with complex representations.
- Tools/products:
- Variational quantum algorithms that incorporate reality conditions as constraints to stabilize non-Hermitian circuits.
- Hybrid classical–quantum solvers for Tr ln determinant evaluations and constraint enforcement.
- Assumptions/dependencies:
- Mappability of gravity-inspired inner-product machinery to practical quantum circuits.
- Efficient encodings of constraints (Gauss/diffeomorphism/Hamiltonian-like conditions) in near-term hardware.
- Theoretical and materials insights via extension to other gauge/topological systems
- Sector: academia (condensed matter, high-energy theory), industry (advanced materials)
- What: Apply inner-product and complexifier methods to Chern–Simons-like theories in condensed matter (topological phases), potentially clarifying parity-violating responses.
- Tools/workflows:
- Model-building frameworks for topological states with nonstandard inner products; stability analyses of edge modes under analytic continuation.
- Assumptions/dependencies:
- Careful adaptation to physical (Hermitian) condensed-matter Hamiltonians; identification of appropriate analogs for reality conditions.
- Software ecosystems for canonical quantum gravity
- Sector: software, academia
- What: Persistent tools that implement Ashtekar-variable quantization, holomorphic measures, and phase-space complexifiers, enabling reproducible research.
- Tools/products:
- Open-source packages for canonical constraint solving, inner product evaluation, and perturbation theory in self-dual variables.
- Assumptions/dependencies:
- Community uptake; alignment with evolving standards in quantum gravity research.
- Potential links to baryogenesis and fundamental symmetry breaking
- Sector: academia (particle cosmology)
- What: Explore whether a CPT-breaking gravitational vacuum can seed matter–antimatter asymmetries or interact with leptogenesis mechanisms.
- Tools/workflows:
- Model-building and phenomenological analyses coupling gravity-induced CPT violation to the SM/BSM sectors.
- Assumptions/dependencies:
- A clear, consistent coupling between the gravitational CPT-breaking vacuum and particle physics degrees of freedom; compatibility with current constraints.
Notes on critical dependencies across applications:
- The proposed inner product and phase-space rotation must preserve the full constraint algebra and avoid anomalies.
- Regularization choices (e.g., value and handling of the divergent constant α) can affect quantitative predictions; transparency and consistency checks are required.
- Extension from perturbative, linearized results to the full nonperturbative theory is essential for physically testable consequences.
- Observational relevance depends on whether CPT-violating signatures are strong enough relative to experimental sensitivities and foreground/systematics.
Glossary
- 3+1 decomposition: A slicing of spacetime into three spatial dimensions plus time to formulate dynamics. "In terms of this 3+1 decomposition, the metric becomes"
- antigraviton: The mode paired with the graviton when treating certain perturbative degrees of freedom as complex; not a standard particle but a bookkeeping device in this context. "introducing independent graviton and antigraviton degrees of freedom"
- Ashtekar connection: A complex self-dual connection variable used in the canonical formulation of general relativity. "For vanishing torsion, this is the Ashtekar connection"
- Ashtekar variables: Canonical variables (self-dual connection and densitized triad) that recast general relativity into a gauge-theoretic form. "We introduce Ashtekar's variables, placing particular emphasis on the non-orthonormal eigenstates of the Ashtekar connection operator."
- Bunch-Davies vacuum: The standard choice of initial quantum state for perturbations in de Sitter or inflationary spacetimes. "The mode functions corresponding to the Bunch-Davies vacuum are"
- canonical quantization: A procedure to quantize a classical theory by promoting canonical variables to operators with commutation relations. "we outline the canonical quantization of general relativity"
- Chern-Simons functional: A topological functional of a connection whose exponential appears in certain quantum states. "Here, we have introduced the Chern-Simons functional"
- Chern-Simons-Kodama (CSK) state: An exact (formal) solution to the quantum gravity constraints in the self-dual formulation, built from the Chern-Simons functional. "The Chern-Simons-Kodama state is naïvely nonnormalizable."
- CPT symmetry: The combined symmetry of charge conjugation, parity transformation, and time reversal; its violation/asymmetry is notable in this context. "its apparent violation of CPT symmetry"
- de Sitter spacetime: A maximally symmetric spacetime with positive cosmological constant, important in cosmology. "semiclassically describes de Sitter spacetime"
- densitized triad: The momentum conjugate to the Ashtekar connection; a triad weighted by the determinant of the spatial metric. "The densitized triad is defined as"
- diffeomorphism constraint: A constraint enforcing invariance under spatial coordinate transformations in canonical gravity. "and the fourth to the diffeomorphism constraint."
- Einstein-Cartan theory: A first-order formulation of gravity including torsion via independent spin connection and tetrad. "From the first term we recover ordinary Einstein-Cartan theory"
- Einstein-Hilbert action: The standard action for general relativity expressed in terms of the metric and its curvature scalar. "Indeed, when , is proportional to the Einstein-Hilbert action"
- Faddeev-Popov ghost fields: Auxiliary fields introduced in path integrals to correctly handle gauge fixing. "necessitating the introduction of Faddeev-Popov ghost fields."
- FLRW: The Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metric form describing homogeneous and isotropic cosmologies. "consider perturbations around de Sitter space in FLRW form."
- Gauss constraint: A constraint ensuring invariance under internal gauge transformations in the Ashtekar formulation. "the third to the Gauss constraint"
- gauge covariant derivative: A derivative that includes the connection to maintain gauge covariance. "where is a gauge covariant derivative"
- graviton: The quantum of the gravitational field; in this context, perturbative spin-2 excitations. "investigating also the physical graviton states"
- Hamiltonian constraint: The constraint corresponding to time reparametrization invariance, central to the dynamics in canonical gravity. "the Hamiltonian constraint (\ref{eq:hamiltonian_constaint})"
- Holst term: An additional term in the first-order gravity action that vanishes for torsionless configurations but affects quantum theory. "the extra term is known as the Holst term"
- holomorphic inner product: An inner product appropriate for non-self-adjoint (complex) variables, enforcing reality conditions. "must employ a holomorphic inner product, one derived from enforcing the quantum analogs of the classical reality conditions."
- mode-by-mode Wick rotation: An analytic continuation applied separately to individual modes to address convergence/normalizability issues. "a generalized, mode-by-mode Wick rotation---introduced by Thiemann"
- nonperturbative holomorphic inner product: An inner product defined without reliance on perturbation theory, consistent with reality conditions. "Starting from a nonperturbative holomorphic inner product"
- path integral: A formulation of quantum theory summing over histories, here over geometries/connections (including torsionful ones in the self-dual action). "the path integral defined by includes summations over connections with nonvanishing torsion"
- phase-space Wick rotation: An analytic continuation performed in canonical variables (coordinates and momenta) to improve convergence. "the phase-space Wick rotation of Thiemann"
- polarization tensors: Tensorial generalizations of polarization vectors specifying graviton helicity states. " are the two transverse, traceless, and symmetric polarization tensors."
- reality conditions: Constraints ensuring that complex variables correspond to real classical geometries upon quantization. "derived from enforcing the quantum analogs of the classical reality conditions."
- self-dual connection: A complex connection equal to its own (Hodge) dual in internal indices, central to Ashtekar’s formalism. "is the curvature of the self-dual connection"
- spin connection: The connection associated with local Lorentz transformations acting on tetrads. "curvature two-form of the spin connection "
- superspace: The space of all spatial geometries modulo diffeomorphisms and gauge transformations. "then the space of solutions is reduced to superspace."
- tetrad (vierbein): A set of four linearly independent vectors at each spacetime point relating the metric to a local Minkowski frame. "the fundamental variables are the tetrads"
- Thiemann’s complexifier: An operator generating complex canonical transformations used to define coherent states/analytic continuations. "a rotation in phase space, a generalization of Thiemann’s complexifier"
- torsion: The antisymmetric part of the connection related to the failure of parallelograms to close; vanishes in torsionless GR. "the torsion is zero"
- transverse-traceless (TT) gauge: A gauge for gravitational waves isolating physical degrees of freedom by imposing transversality and tracelessness. "In the transverse-traceless (TT) gauge, the physical metric perturbation is written ."
- Wheeler-DeWitt equation: The quantum Hamiltonian constraint equation for the wavefunctional of the universe. "the constraint becomes the Wheeler-DeWitt equation"
- Yang–Mills measure: The standard inner-product measure used in Yang–Mills theory; used here as a (naïve) analogy. "the formal analog of the Yang--Mills measure"
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.