Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 200 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 42 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 95 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 204 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 427 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Scaling LLM Inference with Optimized Sample Compute Allocation (2410.22480v1)

Published 29 Oct 2024 in cs.CL and cs.AI

Abstract: Sampling is a basic operation in many inference-time algorithms of LLMs. To scale up inference efficiently with a limited compute, it is crucial to find an optimal allocation for sample compute budgets: Which sampling configurations (model, temperature, language, etc.) do we use? How many samples do we generate in each configuration? We formulate these choices as a learning problem and propose OSCA, an algorithm that Optimizes Sample Compute Allocation by finding an optimal mix of different inference configurations. Our experiments show that with our learned mixed allocation, we can achieve accuracy better than the best single configuration with 128x less compute on code generation and 25x less compute on 4 reasoning tasks. OSCA is also shown to be effective in agentic workflows beyond single-turn tasks, achieving a better accuracy on SWE-Bench with 3x less compute than the default configuration. Our code and generations are released at https://github.com/LeiLiLab/OSCA.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (32)
  1. Large language monkeys: Scaling inference compute with repeated sampling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21787.
  2. Codet: Code generation with generated tests. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv–2207.
  3. Evaluating large language models trained on code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374.
  4. Thoughtsculpt: Reasoning with intermediate revision and search. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.05966.
  5. Learning How Hard to Think: Input-Adaptive Allocation of LM Computation.
  6. Universal transformers. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
  7. Language model cascades. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.10342.
  8. Improving factuality and reasoning in language models through multiagent debate. In Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning.
  9. Alex Graves. 2016. Adaptive computation time for recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.08983.
  10. Enhancing large language models in coding through multi-perspective self-consistency. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.17272.
  11. Livecodebench: Holistic and contamination free evaluation of large language models for code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07974.
  12. LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusion. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 14165–14178, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  13. Swe-bench: Can language models resolve real-world github issues? In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations.
  14. Hypertree proof search for neural theorem proving. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:26337–26349.
  15. Rémi Leblond et al. 2023. Alphacode 2 technical report. Technical report, DeepMind.
  16. Competition-level code generation with alphacode. Science, 378(6624):1092–1097.
  17. Self-refine: Iterative refinement with self-feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36.
  18. Stuart J Russell and Peter Norvig. 2016. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Pearson.
  19. Large language model programs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.05364.
  20. Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36.
  21. Scaling llm test-time compute optimally can be more effective than scaling model parameters.
  22. Toward self-improvement of llms via imagination, searching, and criticizing. Preprint, arXiv:2404.12253.
  23. Cost-effective hyperparameter optimization for large language model generation inference.
  24. Cost-effective hyperparameter optimization for large language model generation inference. In International Conference on Automated Machine Learning, pages 21–1. PMLR.
  25. Llm can achieve self-regulation via hyperparameter aware generation. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024, pages 6632–6646. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  26. Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations.
  27. From decoding to meta-generation: Inference-time algorithms for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.16838.
  28. Livebench: A challenging, contamination-free llm benchmark. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.19314.
  29. An empirical analysis of compute-optimal inference for problem-solving with language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.00724.
  30. Agentless: Demystifying llm-based software engineering agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.01489.
  31. Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36.
  32. Algo: Synthesizing algorithmic programs with generated oracle verifiers. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:54769–54784.
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that Osca’s hill-climbing approach significantly enhances LLM inference accuracy while reducing computational costs.
  • The methodology employs a mixed compute allocation strategy across multiple configurations to address challenges in code generation and reasoning tasks.
  • Empirical evaluations on benchmarks like LiveCodeBench reveal notable improvements in pass rates and scalability compared to standard allocation methods.

An Analytical Examination of Osca: Optimizing Sample Compute Allocation for LLM Inference

The paper "Scaling LLM Inference with Optimized Sample Compute Allocation" presents the Osca algorithm, which strategically optimizes sample compute allocation in LLM inference tasks. The primary focus is on improving accuracy while reducing computational resources, explicitly targeting issues in code generation and reasoning tasks. Through an in-depth exploration of the design and performance of Osca, this document aims to detail the critical insights and potential ramifications of this research for advanced applications in artificial intelligence.

Key Contributions and Methodological Insights

The prevalent challenge in LLM inference is the effective allocation of limited compute resources across various sampling configurations encompassing model choice, temperature settings, output language, and prompt specifications. Osca addresses this by formulating the problem as an optimization task, proposing an algorithm that leverages a hill-climbing approach to find an optimal distribution maximizing accuracy. This is particularly vital in tasks where a monolithic configuration might fall short in addressing diverse problem types effectively.

Osca's effectiveness is underscored by its demonstrated ability to outperform traditional pure and uniformly mixed compute allocations. The paper provides compelling evidence of its prowess through quantitative assessments on benchmarks like LiveCodeBench and LiveBench. For instance, it achieves a significant improvement in pass rates using a fraction of the compute resources required by standard methods.

Evaluative Metrics and Empirical Results

The experimental framework utilized in this paper revolves around comparing Osca's optimized mixed allocation against baseline configurations, such as default pure, optimal pure, and uniform mixed allocations. Results notably highlight Osca's ability to maintain superior accuracy growth with increasingly larger compute budgets. This scaling advantage is crucial for applications constrained by computational efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Critically, Osca's success is not contingent on a precise tuning of hyperparameters across diverse tasks; it broadens the exploration space by considering multiple models and temperatures, which are typically fixed in routine inference configurations. The robustness of these allocations in variable settings suggests potential adaptability across different LLM applications, promoting holistic model utilization strategies.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

Osca contributes substantively to the theoretical understanding of inference optimization in LLMs by demonstrating the benefits of flexible sampling strategies. From a practical viewpoint, its applicability extends beyond straightforward single-turn tasks. In agentic workflows for complex benchmarks such as SWE-Bench, Osca provides tangible performance enhancements, illustrating its capability to integrate seamlessly into multi-modal and multi-stage LLM frameworks.

The algorithm introduces a prospective paradigm in inference compute management where adaptive strategies replace static configurations, particularly beneficial in real-time and resource-constrained environments. Future exploration might focus on extending these principles to additional hyperparameters and investigating its impact when scaling computational limits further.

Concluding Remarks

The advancements posited by the Osca algorithm offer a nuanced perspective on LLM optimization, presenting a compelling case for the strategic allocation of compute resources. The paper convincingly argues for the necessity and efficacy of mixed allocation models, reinforcing the idea that a one-size-fits-all solution is seldom optimal in complex LLM deployments. Thus, Osca's methodology aligns with ongoing trends toward more adaptive, context-sensitive AI systems capable of nuanced decision-making and resource allocation. Researchers and practitioners within the AI community will find the insights and methodologies introduced here to be of considerable value for upcoming developments in optimizing large-scale LLMs.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

GitHub

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 7 tweets and received 122 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: