Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 75 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 42 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 98 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 226 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 447 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

SAGAbg II: the Low-Mass Star-Forming Sequence Evolves Significantly Between 0.05<z<0.21 (2409.12221v1)

Published 18 Sep 2024 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: The redshift-dependent relation between galaxy stellar mass and star formation rate (the Star-Forming Sequence, or SFS) is a key observational yardstick for galaxy assembly. We use the SAGAbg-A sample of background galaxies from the Satellites Around Galactic Analogs (SAGA) Survey to model the low-redshift evolution of the low-mass SFS. The sample is comprised of 23258 galaxies with H$\alpha$-based star formation rates (SFRs) spanning $6<\log_{10}(\rm M_\star/[M_\odot])<10$ and $z<0.21$ ($t<2.5$ Gyr). Although it is common to bin or stack galaxies at $z \lesssim 0.2$ for galaxy population studies, the difference in lookback time between $z=0$ and $z=0.21$ is comparable to the time between $z=1$ to $z=2$. We develop a model to account for both the physical evolution of low-mass SFS and the selection function of the SAGA survey, allowing us to disentangle redshift evolution from redshift-dependent selection effects across the SAGAbg-A redshift range. Our findings indicate significant evolution in the SFS over the last 2.5 Gyr, with a rising normalization: $\langle {\rm SFR}({\rm M_\star=10{8.5} M_\odot)}\rangle(z)=1.24{+0.25}_{-0.23}\ {\rm z} -1.47{+0.03}_{-0.03}$. We also identify the redshift limit at which a static SFS is ruled out at the 95% confidence level, which is $z=0.05$ based on the precision of the SAGAbg-A sample. Comparison with cosmological hydrodynamic simulations reveals that some contemporary simulations under-predict the recent evolution of the low-mass SFS. This demonstrates that the recent evolution of the low-mass SFS can provide new constraints on the assembly of the low-mass Universe and highlights the need for improved models in this regime.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com