Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 87 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 105 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 471 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 193 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Galaxy population constraints on cosmology and star formation in the early Universe (2105.05098v1)

Published 11 May 2021 in astro-ph.CO and astro-ph.GA

Abstract: We present the first post-cosmic-microwave-background early-Universe observational constraints on $\sigma_8$, $\Omega_{\rm m}$, mean galaxy star-forming efficiency and galaxy UV magnitude scatter at redshifts $z = 4-10$. We perform a simultaneous 11-parameter cosmology and star-formation physics fit using the new code GalaxyMC, with redshift $z>4$ galaxy UV luminosity and correlation function data. Consistent with previous studies, we find evidence for redshift-independent star formation physics, regulated by halo assembly. For a flat $\Lambda$CDM universe with a low-redshift Hubble constant and a Type Ia supernovae $\Omega_{\rm m}$ prior, we constrain $\sigma_8 = 0.81 \pm 0.03$, and a mean star-forming efficiency peaking at $\log_{10} {\rm SFE} = -[(0.09 \pm 0.20) + (0.58 \pm 0.29) \times \log_{10} (1+z)]$ for halo mass $\log_{10} M_{\rm p} / h{-1} M_{\odot} = 11.48 \pm 0.09$. The suppression of star formation due to feedback is given by a double power law in halo mass with indices $\alpha = 0.56 \pm 0.08, \beta = -1.03 \pm 0.07$. The scatter in galaxy UV magnitude for fixed halo mass is $\sigma_M = 0.56 \pm 0.08$. Without a prior on $\Omega_{\rm m}$ we obtain $\sigma_8 = 0.78 \pm 0.06$, $\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.33 \pm 0.07$ and at most $1\sigma$ differences in all other parameter values. Our best-fit galaxy luminosity functions yield a reionization optical depth $\tau \approx 0.048$, consistent with the Planck 2018 value.

Citations (1)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.