Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Lexicographic optimization-based approaches to learning a representative model for multi-criteria sorting with non-monotonic criteria

Published 3 Sep 2024 in cs.AI and cs.LG | (2409.01612v1)

Abstract: Deriving a representative model using value function-based methods from the perspective of preference disaggregation has emerged as a prominent and growing topic in multi-criteria sorting (MCS) problems. A noteworthy observation is that many existing approaches to learning a representative model for MCS problems traditionally assume the monotonicity of criteria, which may not always align with the complexities found in real-world MCS scenarios. Consequently, this paper proposes some approaches to learning a representative model for MCS problems with non-monotonic criteria through the integration of the threshold-based value-driven sorting procedure. To do so, we first define some transformation functions to map the marginal values and category thresholds into a UTA-like functional space. Subsequently, we construct constraint sets to model non-monotonic criteria in MCS problems and develop optimization models to check and rectify the inconsistency of the decision maker's assignment example preference information. By simultaneously considering the complexity and discriminative power of the models, two distinct lexicographic optimization-based approaches are developed to derive a representative model for MCS problems with non-monotonic criteria. Eventually, we offer an illustrative example and conduct comprehensive simulation experiments to elaborate the feasibility and validity of the proposed approaches.

Authors (3)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (56)
  1. Electre Tri-C: A multiple criteria sorting method based on characteristic reference actions. European Journal of Operational Research, 204, 565–580.
  2. Inducing a probability distribution in Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis. Omega, 123, 102969.
  3. Coopetition for innovation - the more, the better? an empirical study based on preference disaggregation analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 297, 695–708.
  4. Multiple criteria sorting models and methods—Part I: survey of the literature. 4OR, 21, 1–46.
  5. Multiple criteria sorting models and methods. Part II: theoretical results and general issues. 4OR, 21, 181–204.
  6. Ranking with multiple reference points: Efficient SAT-based learning procedures. Computers & Operations Research, 150, 106054.
  7. Multiple-criteria sorting using case-based distance models with an application in water resources management. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 37, 680–691.
  8. A case-based distance model for multiple criteria ABC analysis. Computers & Operations Research, 35, 776–796.
  9. Recommending multiple criteria decision analysis methods with a new taxonomy-based decision support system. European Journal of Operational Research, 302, 633–651.
  10. Robust ordinal regression in preference learning and ranking. Machine Learning, 93, 381–422.
  11. A robust TOPSIS method for decision making problems with hierarchical and non-monotonic criteria. Expert Systems with Applications, 214, 119045.
  12. Rough set approach to multiple criteria classification with imprecise evaluations and assignments. European Journal of Operational Research, 198, 626–636.
  13. Building additive utilities in the presence of non-monotonic preferences. In Advances in Multicriteria Analysis (pp. 101–114). Boston, MA: Springer.
  14. UTADIS: Une méthode de construction de fonctions d′utilité additives rendant compte de jugements globaux. In European Working Group on Multicriteria Decision Aid, Bochum. volume 94.
  15. A multi-criteria approach to sort and rank policies based on Delphi qualitative assessments and ELECTRE TRI: The case of smart grids in Brazil. Omega, 76, 100–111.
  16. Doumpos, M. (2012). Learning non-monotonic additive value functions for multicriteria decision making. OR Spectrum, 34, 89–106.
  17. Multicriteria preference disaggregation for classification problems with an application to global investing risk. Decision Sciences, 32, 333–386.
  18. Multicriteria Decision Aid Classification Methods. Springer New York, NY.
  19. Inferring robust decision models in multicriteria classification problems: An experimental analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 236, 601–611.
  20. Preprocessing algorithm for handling non-monotone attributes in the UTA method. In Preference Learning: Problems and Applications in AI (pp. 28–32). Montpellier, France.
  21. Incorporating uncovered structural patterns in value functions construction. Omega, 99, 102203.
  22. Understanding the impact of brand colour on brand image: A preference disaggregation approach. Pattern Recognition Letters, 67, 11–18.
  23. A linear programming approach for learning non-monotonic additive value functions in multiple criteria decision aiding. European Journal of Operational Research, 259, 1073–1084.
  24. Selection of a representative value function in robust multiple criteria sorting. Computers & Operations Research, 38, 1620–1637.
  25. Multiple criteria sorting with a set of additive value functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 207, 1455–1470.
  26. A progressive sorting approach for multiple criteria decision aiding in the presence of non-monotonic preferences. Expert Systems with Applications, 123, 1–17.
  27. Consumer preference analysis: A data-driven multiple criteria approach integrating online information. Omega, 96, 102074.
  28. Preference disaggregation: 20 years of MCDA experience. European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 233–245.
  29. Integrated framework for preference modeling and robustness analysis for outranking-based multiple criteria sorting with ELECTRE and PROMETHEE. Information Sciences, 352-353, 167–187.
  30. Active learning strategies for interactive elicitation of assignment examples for threshold-based multiple criteria sorting. European Journal of Operational Research, 293, 658–680.
  31. Modeling assignment-based pairwise comparisons within integrated framework for value-driven multiple criteria sorting. European Journal of Operational Research, 241, 830–841.
  32. Expressiveness and robustness measures for the evaluation of an additive value function in multiple criteria preference disaggregation methods: An experimental analysis. Computers & Operations Research, 87, 146–164.
  33. Preference disaggregation for multiple criteria sorting with partial monotonicity constraints: Application to exposure management of nanomaterials. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 117, 60–80.
  34. Preference disaggregation method for value-based multi-decision sorting problems with a real-world application in nanotechnology. Knowledge-Based Systems, 218, 106879.
  35. Robustness analysis for decision under uncertainty with rule-based preference model. Information Sciences, 328, 321–339.
  36. Learning the parameters of an outranking-based sorting model with characteristic class profiles from large sets of assignment examples. Applied Soft Computing, 116, 108312.
  37. Stochastic ordinal regression for multiple criteria sorting problems. Decision Support Systems, 55, 55–66.
  38. Kliegr, T. (2009). UTA-NM: Explaining stated preferences with additive non-monotonic utility functions. In Proceedings of the Preference Learning ECML/PKDD-2009 workshop (pp. 56–68).
  39. Threshold-based value-driven method to support consensus reaching in multicriteria group sorting problems: A minimum adjustment perspective. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 11, 1230–1243.
  40. Consensus reaching for ordinal classification-based group decision making with heterogeneous preference information. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 75, 224–245.
  41. Sorting with TOPSIS through boundary and characteristic profiles. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 141, 106328.
  42. Data-driven preference learning methods for value-driven multiple criteria sorting with interacting criteria. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 33, 586–606.
  43. A preference learning framework for multiple criteria sorting with diverse additive value models and valued assignment examples. European Journal of Operational Research, 286, 963–985.
  44. Preference disaggregation within the regularization framework for sorting problems with multiple potentially non-monotonic criteria. European Journal of Operational Research, 276, 1071–1089.
  45. A group decision-making approach based on evidential reasoning for multiple criteria sorting problem with uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 246, 858–873.
  46. A classification approach based on the outranking model for multiple criteria ABC analysis. Omega, 61, 19–34.
  47. Deep preference learning for multiple criteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 305, 781–805.
  48. Inferring a hierarchical majority-rule sorting model. Computers & Operations Research, 146, 105888.
  49. SMAA-Choquet-FlowSort: A novel user-preference-driven Choquet classifier applied to supplier evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications, 207, 117898.
  50. Context-dependent DEASort: A multiple criteria sorting method for ecological risk assessment problems. Information Sciences, 572, 88–108.
  51. Rezaei, J. (2018). Piecewise linear value functions for multi-criteria decision-making. Expert Systems with Applications, 98, 43–56.
  52. Probabilistic ordinal regression methods for multiple criteria sorting admitting certain and uncertain preferences. European Journal of Operational Research, 311, 596–616.
  53. UTA-poly and UTA-splines: Additive value functions with polynomial marginals. European Journal of Operational Research, 264, 405–418.
  54. Emosor: Evolutionary multiple objective optimization guided by interactive stochastic ordinal regression. Computers & Operations Research, 108, 134–154.
  55. Consensus-based TOPSIS-Sort-B for multi-criteria sorting in the context of group decision-making. Annals of Operations Research, 325, 911–938.
  56. A preference disaggregation decision support system for financial classification problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 402–413.
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.