Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Exploiting many-body localization for scalable variational quantum simulation

Published 26 Apr 2024 in quant-ph | (2404.17560v2)

Abstract: Variational quantum algorithms have emerged as a promising approach to achieving practical quantum advantages using near-term quantum devices. Despite their potential, the scalability of these algorithms poses a significant challenge. This is largely attributed to the "barren plateau" phenomenon, which persists even in the absence of noise. In this work, we explore the many-body localization (MBL)-thermalization phase transitions within a framework of Floquet-initialized variational quantum circuits and investigate how MBL could be used to avoid barren plateaus. The phase transitions are observed through calculations of the inverse participation ratio, the entanglement entropy, and a metric termed low-weight stabilizer R\'enyi entropy. By initializing the circuit in the MBL phase and employing an easily preparable initial state, we find it is possible to prevent the formation of a unitary 2-design, resulting in an output state with entanglement that follows an area- rather than a volume-law, and which circumvents barren plateaus throughout the optimization. Utilizing this methodology, we successfully determine the ground states of various model Hamiltonians across different phases and show that the resources required for the optimization are significantly reduced. We have further validated the MBL approach through experiments carried out on the 127-qubit $ibm_brisbane$ quantum processor. These experiments confirm that the gradients needed to carry out variational calculations are restored in the MBL phase of a Heisenberg model subject to random unitary "kicks". These results provide new insights into the interplay between MBL and quantum computing, and suggest that the role of MBL states should be considered in the design of quantum algorithms.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (39)
  1. J. Preskill, Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
  2. D. Wecker, M. B. Hastings, and M. Troyer, Phys. Rev. A 92, 042303 (2015).
  3. E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, and S. Gutmann, A quantum approximate optimization algorithm (2014), arXiv:1411.4028 [quant-ph] .
  4. D. Gross, S. T. Flammia, and J. Eisert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 190501 (2009).
  5. C. Ortiz Marrero, M. Kieferová, and N. Wiebe, PRX Quantum 2, 040316 (2021).
  6. C.-Y. Park and N. Killoran, Quantum 8, 1239 (2024).
  7. P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958).
  8. D. Basko, I. Aleiner, and B. Altshuler, Annals of Physics 321, 1126 (2006).
  9. R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 6, 15 (2015).
  10. J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277 (2010).
  11. K. Su and M. J. Lawler, Phys. Rev. B 106, 214310 (2022).
  12. A. Lazarides, A. Das, and R. Moessner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 030402 (2015).
  13. D. A. Abanin, W. De Roeck, and F. Huveneers, Annals of Physics 372, 1 (2016).
  14. D. R. Hartree, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 24, 89–110 (1928a).
  15. D. R. Hartree, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 24, 111–132 (1928b).
  16. F. Verstraete, V. Murg, and J. Cirac, Advances in Physics 57, 143 (2008).
  17. U. Schollwöck, Annals of Physics 326, 96 (2011), january 2011 Special Issue.
  18. D. Gross, K. Audenaert, and J. Eisert, Journal of Mathematical Physics 48, 10.1063/1.2716992 (2007), 052104.
  19. A. D. Luca and A. Scardicchio, Europhysics Letters 101, 37003 (2013).
  20. S. Sim, P. D. Johnson, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Advanced Quantum Technologies 2, 1900070 (2019).
  21. A. W. Harrow, The church of the symmetric subspace (2013), arXiv:1308.6595 [quant-ph] .
  22. A. Pal and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. B 82, 174411 (2010).
  23. L. Leone, S. F. E. Oliviero, and A. Hamma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 050402 (2022).
  24. N. P. Breuckmann and J. N. Eberhardt, PRX Quantum 2, 040101 (2021).
  25. D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1291 (1993).
  26. S. K. Foong and S. Kanno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1148 (1994).
  27. M. B. Hastings, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2007, P08024 (2007).
  28. S. Aubry and G. André, Ann. Israel Phys. Soc 3, 18 (1980).
  29. P. Jordan and E. Wigner, Zeitschrift für Physik 47, 631 (1928).
  30. R. Orús, Nature Reviews Physics 1, 538 (2019).
  31. G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 040502 (2004).
  32. C. Zoufal, A. Lucchi, and S. Woerner, npj Quantum Information 5, 103 (2019).
  33. S.-J. Ran, Phys. Rev. A 101, 032310 (2020).
  34. C. Cao, H. Yano, and Y. O. Nakagawa, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013205 (2024).
  35. C.-Y. Park, M. Kang, and J. Huh, Hardware-efficient ansatz without barren plateaus in any depth (2024), arXiv:2403.04844 [quant-ph] .
  36. R. R. Tucci, An introduction to cartan’s kak decomposition for qc programmers (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0507171 [quant-ph] .
  37. A. Y. Kitaev, Russian Mathematical Surveys 52, 1191 (1997).
  38. S. Datta, S. Howard, and D. Cochran, Linear Algebra and Its Applications 437, 2455 (2012).
  39. R. N. Youngworth, B. B. Gallagher, and B. L. Stamper, in Optical Manufacturing and Testing VI, Vol. 5869, edited by H. P. Stahl, International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE, 2005) p. 58690U.
Citations (5)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 3 likes about this paper.