Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 128 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 75 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 189 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 432 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Sharp quantitative stability of the Yamabe problem (2404.13961v2)

Published 22 Apr 2024 in math.AP

Abstract: Given a smooth closed Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$ of dimension $N \ge 3$, we derive sharp quantitative stability estimates for nonnegative functions near the solution set of the Yamabe problem on $(M,g)$. The seminal work of Struwe (1984) \cite{S} states that if $\Gamma(u) := |\Delta_g u - \frac{N-2}{4(N-1)} R_g u + u{\frac{N+2}{N-2}}|_{H{-1}(M)} \to 0$, then $|u-(u_0+\sum_{i=1}{\nu} \mathcal{V}i)|{H1(M)} \to 0$ where $u_0$ is a solution to the Yamabe problem on $(M,g)$, $\nu \in \mathbb{N} \cup {0}$, and $\mathcal{V}i$ is a bubble-like function. If $M$ is the round sphere $\mathbb{S}N$, then $u_0 \equiv 0$ and a natural candidate of $\mathcal{V}_i$ is a bubble itself. If $M$ is not conformally equivalent to $\mathbb{S}N$, then either $u_0 > 0$ or $u_0 \equiv 0$, there is no canonical choice of $\mathcal{V}_i$, and so a careful selection of $\mathcal{V}_i$ must be made to attain optimal estimates. For $3 \le N \le 5$, we construct suitable $\mathcal{V}_i$'s and then establish the inequality $|u-(u_0+\sum{i=1}{\nu} \mathcal{V}i)|{H1(M)}$ $ \le C\zeta(\Gamma(u))$ where $C > 0$ and $\zeta(t) = t$, consistent with the result of Figalli and Glaudo (2020) \cite{FG} on $\mathbb{S}N$. In the case of $N \ge 6$, we investigate the single-bubbling phenomenon $(\nu = 1)$ on generic Riemannian manifolds $(M,g)$, proving that $\zeta(t)$ is determined by $N$, $u_0$, and $g$, and can be much larger than $t$. This exhibits a striking difference from the result of Ciraolo, Figalli, and Maggi (2018) \cite{CFM} on $\mathbb{S}N$. All of the estimates presented herein are optimal.

Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.