Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 71 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 17 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 111 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 161 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 412 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 35 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Testing beyond-Kerr spacetimes with GWTC-3 (2403.17718v1)

Published 26 Mar 2024 in gr-qc

Abstract: The Kerr spacetime is a fundamental solution of general relativity (GR), describing the gravitational field around a rotating, uncharged black hole (BH). Kerr spacetime has been crucial in modern astrophysics and it serves as a foundation for the study of gravitational waves (GWs). Possible deviations in Kerr geometry may indicate deviations from GR predictions. In this work, we consider the Johannsen-Psaltis metric, which is a beyond-Kerr metric characterized by a single free parameter, and then we probe this theory framework using several GWs observations from the third Gravitational-wave Transient Catalog (GWTC-3). We find that, for most of the events analyzed, there are no significant deviations from the null hypothesis, i.e. the Kerr metric. Our main findings demonstrate alignment and certain enhancements when compared to previous estimates documented in the literature.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (21)
  1. C. M. Will, Living Reviews in Relativity 17 (2014), 10.12942/lrr-2014-4.
  2. S. G. Turyshev, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 58, 207 (2008).
  3. M. Ishak, Living Rev. Rel. 22, 1 (2019), arXiv:1806.10122 [astro-ph.CO] .
  4. L. Heisenberg, Physics Reports 796, 1 (2019).
  5. E. N. Saridakis et al. (CANTATA),   (2021), arXiv:2105.12582 [gr-qc] .
  6. N. Yunes and F. Pretorius, Physical Review D 80 (2009), 10.1103/physrevd.80.122003.
  7. Z. Carson and K. Yagi, Physical Review D 101 (2020a), 10.1103/physrevd.101.044047.
  8. T. L. S. Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration,  and the KAGRA Collaboration, “Tests of general relativity with gwtc-3,”  (2021b), arXiv:2112.06861 [gr-qc] .
  9. R. A. et al, Physical Review D 103 (2021), 10.1103/physrevd.103.122002.
  10. R. P. Kerr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 237 (1963).
  11. J. Gair and N. Yunes, Physical Review D 84 (2011), 10.1103/physrevd.84.064016.
  12. Z. Carson and K. Yagi, arXiv: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology  (2020b), 10.1103/physrevd.101.084050.
  13. A. Hussain and A. Zimmerman, Physical Review D 106 (2022), 10.1103/physrevd.106.104018.
  14. K. Glampedakis and G. Pappas, Physical Review D 104 (2021), 10.1103/physrevd.104.l081503.
  15. S. H. Völkel and E. Barausse, Physical Review D 102 (2020), 10.1103/physrevd.102.084025.
  16. S. Shashank and C. Bambi, Phys. Rev. D 105, 104004 (2022).
  17. T. Johannsen and D. Psaltis, Physical Review D 83 (2011), 10.1103/physrevd.83.124015.
  18. S. Tahura and K. Yagi, Physical Review D 98 (2018), 10.1103/physrevd.98.084042.
  19. Z. Ahmed, S. Kastha,  and A. B. Nielsen, “Constraining parametric deviation from kerr using black hole ringdown of gw150914 and gw190521,”  (2024), arXiv:2401.06049 [gr-qc] .
  20. A. Nishizawa, Physical Review D 97 (2018), 10.1103/physrevd.97.104037.
  21. R. D’Agostino and R. C. Nunes, Physical Review D 100 (2019), 10.1103/physrevd.100.044041.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 post and received 0 likes.