Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Using Graph Neural Networks to Predict Local Culture

Published 27 Feb 2024 in cs.LG, cs.CY, and cs.SI | (2402.17905v3)

Abstract: Urban research has long recognized that neighbourhoods are dynamic and relational. However, lack of data, methodologies, and computer processing power have hampered a formal quantitative examination of neighbourhood relational dynamics. To make progress on this issue, this study proposes a graph neural network (GNN) approach that permits combining and evaluating multiple sources of information about internal characteristics of neighbourhoods, their past characteristics, and flows of groups among them, potentially providing greater expressive power in predictive models. By exploring a public large-scale dataset from Yelp, we show the potential of our approach for considering structural connectedness in predicting neighbourhood attributes, specifically to predict local culture. Results are promising from a substantive and methodologically point of view. Substantively, we find that either local area information (e.g. area demographics) or group profiles (tastes of Yelp reviewers) give the best results in predicting local culture, and they are nearly equivalent in all studied cases. Methodologically, exploring group profiles could be a helpful alternative where finding local information for specific areas is challenging, since they can be extracted automatically from many forms of online data. Thus, our approach could empower researchers and policy-makers to use a range of data sources when other local area information is lacking.

Authors (2)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (93)
  1. Abbott A (2017) Department and discipline: Chicago sociology at one hundred. University of Chicago Press.
  2. Journal of Urban Affairs 43(1): 77–92. 10.1080/07352166.2019.1662726.
  3. Arribas-Bel D, Kourtit K and Nijkamp P (2016) The sociocultural sources of urban buzz. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 34(1): 188–204.
  4. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(46): e2026160118.
  5. Blei DM, Ng AY and Jordan MI (2003) Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3(Jan): 993–1022.
  6. Brazil N (2022) Environmental inequality in the neighborhood networks of urban mobility in US cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119(17). 10.1073/pnas.2117776119.
  7. Brown-Saracino J and Parker JN (2017) ‘what is up with my sisters? where are you?’the origins and consequences of lesbian-friendly place reputations for lbq migrants. Sexualities 20(7): 835–874.
  8. American Journal of Sociology 122(6): 1939–1988.
  9. Annual Review of Sociology 46(1): 623–648. 10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054848.
  10. Urban Studies 58(15): 3095–3117. 10.1177/0042098020978965.
  11. Chen M, Arribas-Bel D and Singleton A (2019) Understanding the dynamics of urban areas of interest through volunteered geographic information. Journal of Geographical Systems 21: 89–109.
  12. Chen T and Guestrin C (2016) Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. pp. 785–794.
  13. Chen Z and Park J (2021) Analyzing Cultural Assimilation through the Lens of Yelp Restaurant Reviews. In: 2021 IEEE 8th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA). IEEE. 10.1109/dsaa53316.2021.9564170.
  14. Daepp MIG (2021) Small-area moving ratios and the spatial connectivity of neighborhoods: Insights from consumer credit data. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 49(3): 1129–1146. 10.1177/23998083211051742.
  15. Delmelle EC and Rey SJ (2021) Neighborhood effects and neighborhood dynamics. Geographical Analysis 53(2): 167–169.
  16. Dias F and Silver D (2021) Neighborhood dynamics with unharmonized longitudinal data. Geographical Analysis 53(2): 170–191.
  17. Doering J, Silver D and Taylor Z (2021) The spatial articulation of urban political cleavages. Urban Affairs Review 57(4): 911–951.
  18. Dong L, Ratti C and Zheng S (2019) Predicting neighborhoods’ socioeconomic attributes using restaurant data. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences 116(31): 15447–15452.
  19. Routledge.
  20. Durkheim E (2014) The division of labor in society. Simon and Schuster.
  21. Ferreira AP, Silva TH and Loureiro AA (2020) Uncovering spatiotemporal and semantic aspects of tourists mobility using social sensing. Computer Communications 160: 240 – 252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2020.06.005.
  22. Fox MS, Silver D and Adler P (2022a) Towards a model of urban evolution: Part ii: Formal model. Urban Science 6(4): 88.
  23. Urban Science 6(4): 86.
  24. Ghaziani A (2016) There goes the gayborhood? Princeton University Press.
  25. SSRN Electronic Journal 10.2139/ssrn.3911354.
  26. Glaeser EL, Kim H and Luca M (2018) Nowcasting Gentrification: Using Yelp Data to Quantify Neighborhood Change. SSRN Electronic Journal 10.2139/ssrn.3123733.
  27. Justice Quarterly 38(2): 344–374. 10.1080/07418825.2019.1602160.
  28. Greenlee AJ (2019) Assessing the intersection of neighborhood change and residential mobility pathways for the chicago metropolitan area (2006–2015). Housing Policy Debate 29(1): 186–212.
  29. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 22(2): 1138–1149.
  30. Hamilton WL (2020) Graph representation learning. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning 14(3): 1–159.
  31. Sage.
  32. In: Challenging Criminological Theory. Routledge, pp. 275–298.
  33. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 87: 101619.
  34. Ilic L, Sawada M and Zarzelli A (2019) Deep mapping gentrification in a large Canadian city using deep learning and Google Street View. PLOS ONE 14(3): e0212814. 10.1371/journal.pone.0212814.
  35. Inglehart R (2007) 223 Postmaterialist Values and the Shift from Survival to Self‐Expression Values. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.003.0012. URL https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.003.0012.
  36. Kipf TN and Welling M (2017) Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In: International Conference on Learning Representations.
  37. SocArXiv .
  38. Levy BL, Phillips NE and Sampson RJ (2020) Triple disadvantage: Neighborhood networks of everyday urban mobility and violence in us cities. American Sociological Review 85(6): 925–956.
  39. Science Advances 8(7): eabl3825.
  40. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.07739 .
  41. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 35(12): 2489–2516.
  42. Li M and Zhu Z (2021) Spatial-temporal fusion graph neural networks for traffic flow forecasting. In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 35. pp. 4189–4196.
  43. In: Proc. of Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Edinburgh, UK, pp. 262–272.
  44. Neal ZP (2012) The connected city: How networks are shaping the modern metropolis. Routledge.
  45. Noh SC and Park JH (2021) Café and Restaurant under My Home: Predicting Urban Commercialization through Machine Learning. Sustainability 13(10): 5699. 10.3390/su13105699.
  46. Cities 110: 103045.
  47. Geographical Analysis 53(2): 192–212.
  48. Palafox L and Ortiz-Monasterio P (2020) Predicting Gentrification in Mexico City using Neural Networks. In: 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE. 10.1109/ijcnn48605.2020.9207685.
  49. Papachristos AV and Bastomski S (2018) Connected in crime: The enduring effect of neighborhood networks on the spatial patterning of violence. American Journal of Sociology 124(2): 517–568.
  50. In: IGARSS 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IEEE. 10.1109/igarss.2019.8900330.
  51. Sociological Methods & Research 50(3): 1110–1149. 10.1177/0049124119852386.
  52. Sociological Methods & Research 50(3): 1110–1149.
  53. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 19(2): 197–215. 10.1080/13658810410001713416.
  54. Urban Geography 43(7): 960–983. 10.1080/02723638.2021.1888016.
  55. Rahimi S, Andris C and Liu X (2017) Using yelp to find romance in the city: A case of restaurants in four cities. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Smart Cities and Urban Analytics. pp. 1–8.
  56. Rahimi S and Bose M (2018) Social class and taste in the context of US cities. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Geospatial Humanities. ACM. 10.1145/3282933.3282938.
  57. Rahimi S, Mottahedi S and Liu X (2018) The Geography of Taste: Using Yelp to Study Urban Culture. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 7(9): 376. 10.3390/ijgi7090376.
  58. Health Affairs 35(4): 697–705.
  59. Reades J, De Souza J and Hubbard P (2018) Understanding urban gentrification through machine learning. Urban Studies 56(5): 922–942. 10.1177/0042098018789054.
  60. In: Proc. of the 20th ACM International Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems. Miami, USA.
  61. Sampson RJ (2012) Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. University of Chicago Press.
  62. Planning Practice & Research 35(5): 510–525. 10.1080/02697459.2020.1767394.
  63. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). pp. 1–7. 10.1109/ICC.2018.8422972.
  64. Princeton University Press.
  65. Saxon J (2021) The local structures of human mobility in chicago. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 48(7): 1806–1821.
  66. In: Proc. of the International Conference on Social Informatics (SocInfo’20). Pisa, Italy.
  67. IEEE Access 10: 9257–9270. 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3143503.
  68. Shelton T and Poorthuis A (2019) The Nature of Neighborhoods: Using Big Data to Rethink the Geographies of Atlanta’s Neighborhood Planning Unit System. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109(5): 1341–1361. 10.1080/24694452.2019.1571895.
  69. Shelton T, Poorthuis A and Zook M (2015) Social Media and the City: Rethinking Urban Socio-Spatial Inequality Using User-Generated Geographic Information. SSRN Electronic Journal 10.2139/ssrn.2571757.
  70. Silver D (2017) Some Scenes of Urban Life. SAGE.
  71. Silver D, Adler P and Fox MS (2022a) Towards a model of urban evolution—part i: Context. Urban Science 6(4): 87.
  72. Silver D, Clark TN and Navarro Yanez CJ (2010) Scenes: Social context in an age of contingency. Social forces 88(5): 2293–2324.
  73. Silver D, Fox MS and Adler P (2022b) Towards a model of urban evolution—part iii: Rules of evolution. Urban Science 6(4): 89.
  74. Silver D, Silva T and Adler P (2022c) Changing the scene: applying four models of social evolution to the scenescape. Journal of Wuhan University Technology (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 75: 49–65. 10.14086/j.cnki.wujss.2022.05.005.
  75. Silver D and Silva TH (2021) A markov model of urban evolution: Neighbourhood change as a complex process. PLOS ONE 16(1): 1–29. 10.1371/journal.pone.0245357.
  76. Silver DA and Clark TN (2016) Scenescapes: How qualities of place shape social life. University of Chicago Press.
  77. Silver DA and Silva TH (2023) Complex causal structures of neighbourhood change: Evidence from a functionalist model and yelp data. Cities 133: 104130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104130.
  78. Somashekhar M (2021) Can we bring culture into the large-scale study of gentrification? assessing the possibilities using geodemographic marketing data. Urban Affairs Review 57(5): 1312–1342.
  79. In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 34. pp. 914–921.
  80. Suresh H and Locascio N (2015) Autodetection and classification of hidden cultural city districts from yelp reviews. arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.02527 .
  81. Tan PN, Steinbach M and Kumar V (2016) Introduction to data mining. Pearson Education India.
  82. Tarde G (2010) Gabriel Tarde on communication and social influence: Selected papers. University of Chicago Press.
  83. Cities 134: 104192.
  84. Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology 58(1): 267–288.
  85. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 32(1): 4–24.
  86. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 48(8): 2363–2384.
  87. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 36(10): 2009–2034.
  88. Yelp (2020) Yelp dataset. https://www.yelp.com/dataset.
  89. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 107: 102696.
  90. AI open 1: 57–81.
  91. GeoInformatica : 1–32.
  92. Zorbaugh HW (1983) The gold coast and the slum: A sociological study of Chicago’s near north side. University of Chicago Press.
  93. Journal of Consumer Culture 17(3): 459–479.
Citations (5)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.