Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Charting Ethical Tensions in Multispecies Technology Research through Beneficiary-Epistemology Space

Published 23 Feb 2024 in cs.HC and cs.RO | (2402.15439v1)

Abstract: While ethical challenges are widely discussed in HCI, far less is reported about the ethical processes that researchers routinely navigate. We reflect on a multispecies project that negotiated an especially complex ethical approval process. Cat Royale was an artist-led exploration of creating an artwork to engage audiences in exploring trust in autonomous systems. The artwork took the form of a robot that played with three cats. Gaining ethical approval required an extensive dialogue with three Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) covering computer science, veterinary science and animal welfare, raising tensions around the welfare of the cats, perceived benefits and appropriate methods, and reputational risk to the University. To reveal these tensions we introduce beneficiary-epistemology space, that makes explicit who benefits from research (humans or animals) and underlying epistemologies. Positioning projects and IRBs in this space can help clarify tensions and highlight opportunities to recruit additional expertise.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (66)
  1. Disruptive Improvisations: Making Use of Non-Deterministic Art Practices in HCI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI EA ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3170630
  2. ASPA. 2012. Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 Amendment Regulations 2012. www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2012/9780111530313 accessed 07.06.23.
  3. Fredrik Aspling and Oskar Juhlin. 2017. Theorizing Animal-Computer Interaction as Machinations. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 98, C (feb 2017), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.05.005
  4. Tom L Beauchamp and James F Childress. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, USA.
  5. The Ethical Implications of HCI’s Turn to the Cultural. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 22, 5, Article 24 (aug 2015), 37 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2775107
  6. Performance-Led Research in the Wild. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 20, 3, Article 14 (jul 2013), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2491500.2491502
  7. ACM Publications Board. 2021. ACM Publications Policy on Research Involving Human Participants and Subjects. (Approved August 15, 2021). https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/research-involving-human-participants-and-subjects accessed September 2023.
  8. Five Provocations for Ethical HCI Research. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 852–863. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858313
  9. A method to evaluate haptic interfaces for working dogs. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 98 (2017), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.04.004
  10. Yoram Chisik and Clara Mancini. 2020. P for Politics D for Dialogue: Reflections on Participatory Design with Children and Animals. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (Haifa, Israel) (ACI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 15, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371049.3371061
  11. Intersoft Consulting. 2016. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation). https://gdpr-info.eu accessed 12.09.23.
  12. European Council. 2010. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Official Journal of the European Union.
  13. Robert Dingwall. 2008. The ethical case against ethical regulation in humanities and social science research. Twenty-First Century Society 3, 1 (2008), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450140701749189
  14. Nourishing the Ground for Sustainable HCI: Considerations from Ecologically Engaged Art. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518763
  15. Ernest A Edmonds. 2014. Human computer interaction, art and experience. In Interactive experience in the digital age: evaluating new art practice. Springer, 11–23.
  16. Jacklyn J. Ellis. 2022. Beyond ”Doing Better”: Ordinal Rating Scales to Monitor Behavioural Indicators of Well-Being in Cats. Animals 12, 21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12212897
  17. AAFP and ISFM Feline Environmental Needs Guidelines. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 15, 3 (2013), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X13477537
  18. Ambiguity as a Resource for Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA) (CHI ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642653
  19. Eva Haifa Giraud. 2019. What comes after entanglement?: Activism, anthropocentrism, and an ethics of exclusion. Duke University Press.
  20. D Haraway. 2008. When Species Meet (Minnesota, University of Minnesota Press). (2008).
  21. Donna Haraway. 2016. ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective’. In Space, gender, knowledge: Feminist readings. Routledge, 53–72.
  22. I Hirskyj-Douglas and JC Read. 2016. The ethics of how to work with dogs in animal computer interaction. In Proceedings of the Animal Computer Interaction Symposium. Measuring Behaviour.
  23. M R Kessler and D C Turner. 1997. Stress and Adaptation of Cats (Felis Silvestris Catus) Housed Singly, in Pairs and in Groups in Boarding Catteries. Animal Welfare 6, 3 (1997), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962728600019837
  24. Eduardo Kohn. 2013. How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Univ of California Press.
  25. Recommendations for Addressing Harm–Benefit Analysis and Implementation in Ethical Evaluation – Report from the AALAS–FELASA Working Group on Harm–Benefit Analysis – Part 2. Laboratory Animals 50, 1_suppl (2016), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677216642397
  26. Bruno Latour. 2007. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oup Oxford.
  27. Problematising Upstream Technology through Speculative Design: The Case of Quantified Cats and Dogs. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2663–2672. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702260
  28. Mitch Librett and Dina Perrone. 2010. Apples and oranges: ethnography and the IRB. Qualitative Research 10, 6 (2010), 729–747.
  29. Yvonna S Lincoln and William G Tierney. 2004. Qualitative research and institutional review boards. Qualitative inquiry 10, 2 (2004), 219–234.
  30. Balancing noise sensitivity, response latency, and posture accuracy for a computer-assisted canine posture training system. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 98 (2017), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.04.010
  31. Clara Mancini. 2017. Towards an animal-centred ethics for Animal–Computer Interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 98 (2017), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.04.008
  32. Politicising Animal-Computer Interaction: an Approach to Political Engagement with Animal-Centred Design: An Approach to Political Engagement with Animal-Centred Design. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction. 1–11.
  33. Politicising Animal-Computer Interaction: An Approach to Political Engagement with Animal-Centred Design: An Approach to Political Engagement with Animal-Centred Design. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom) (ACI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3565995.3566034
  34. Clara Mancini and Jussi Lehtonen. 2018a. The Emerging Nature of Participation in Multispecies Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 907–918. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196785
  35. Clara Mancini and Jussi Lehtonen. 2018b. The emerging nature of participation in multispecies interaction design. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 907–918.
  36. Clara Mancini and Eleonora Nannoni. 2022. Relevance, impartiality, welfare and consent: principles of an animal-centered research ethics. Frontiers in Animal Science 3 (2022), 800186.
  37. Exploring Interspecies Sensemaking: Dog Tracking Semiotics and Multispecies Ethnography. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) (UbiComp ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370239
  38. Deborah G Martin and Joshua Inwood. 2012. Subjectivity, power, and the IRB. The Professional Geographer 64, 1 (2012), 7–15.
  39. Five questions to understand epistemology and its influence on integrative marine research. Frontiers in Marine Science 8 (2021), 574158.
  40. J.H. Moore. 1906. The Universal Kinship.
  41. Jonathan Moss. 2007. If institutional review boards were declared unconstitutional, they would have to be reinvented. Nw. UL Rev. 101 (2007), 801.
  42. Situational Ethics: Re-Thinking Approaches to Formal Ethics Requirements for Human-Computer Interaction. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702481
  43. The Role of Ethological Observation for Measuring Animal Reactions to Biotelemetry Devices. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (Milton Keynes, United Kingdom) (ACI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 5, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152130.3152144
  44. Karl Popper. 2005. The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
  45. The Challenges of Using Biodata in Promotional Filmmaking. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 22, 3, Article 11 (may 2015), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2699758
  46. Blending art events and HCI research. Interactive experience in the digital age: evaluating new art practice (2014), 153–168.
  47. Consent. https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/guidance-for-applicants/research-ethics-guidance/consent/ accessed 12.09.23.
  48. Human participants in research. https://www.ukri.org/manage-your-award/good-research-resource-hub/human-research-participants/ accessed 12.09.23.
  49. Research with children and young people. https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/guidance-for-applicants/research-ethics-guidance/research-with-children-and-young-people/ accessed 12.09.23.
  50. Canine-Centered Interface Design: Supporting the Work of Diabetes Alert Dogs. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3757–3766. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557396
  51. Luisa Ruge and Clara Mancini. 2022. An Ethics Toolkit to Support Animal-Centered Research and Design. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 9 (2022), 891493.
  52. William Moy Stratton Russell and Rex Leonard Burch. 1959. The principles of humane experimental technique. Methuen.
  53. Yaara Sadetzki and Orit Hirsch-Matsioulas. 2022. Leashing the City: Dog-Leash-Human Entanglements and the Urban Space. In Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (Bloomington, IN, USA) (ACI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3493842.3493889
  54. Designing Multispecies Worlds for Robots, Cats, and Humans. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642115
  55. The Purr-suit of Happiness: A Tale of Three Kittens: Robots, Humans, Cats, and AI. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boulder, CO, USA) (HRI ’24 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610978.364079
  56. Cat Royale. Interactions 31, 1 (jan 2024), 64. https://doi.org/10.1145/3636499
  57. TAS for Cats: An Artist-Led Exploration of Trustworthy Autonomous Systems for Companion Animals. In Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems (Edinburgh, United Kingdom) (TAS ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 36, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3597512.3597517
  58. Thomas B Sheridan. 1992. Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control. MIT press.
  59. Laura Stark. 2007. Victims in our own minds? IRBs in myth and practice. Law and Society Review (2007), 777–786.
  60. Heli Väätäjä. 2014. Animal Welfare as a Design Goal in Technology Mediated Human-Animal Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2014 Workshops on Advances in Computer Entertainment Conference (Funchal, Portugal) (ACE ’14 Workshops). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 6, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2693787.2693797
  61. Heli K. Väätäjä and Emilia K. Pesonen. 2013. Ethical Issues and Guidelines When Conducting HCI Studies with Animals. In CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI EA ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2159–2168. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468736
  62. Dirk van der Linden. 2023. Animal-Centered Design Needs Dignity: A Critical Essay on ACI’s Core Concept. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom) (ACI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 2, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3565995.3566028
  63. Ron Wakkary. 2021. Things we could design: For more than human-centered worlds. MIT press.
  64. Welfare through competence: a framework for animal-centric technology design. Frontiers in veterinary science 9 (2022), 885973.
  65. Michelle Westerlaken and Stefano Gualeni. 2016. Becoming with: Towards the Inclusion of Animals as Participants in Design Processes. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (Milton Keynes, United Kingdom) (ACI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2995257.2995392
  66. Going to the Dogs: Towards an Interactive Touchscreen Interface for Working Dogs. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA) (UIST ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 497–507. https://doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647364
Citations (3)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 2 likes about this paper.