Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Designing Multispecies Worlds for Robots, Cats, and Humans

Published 23 Feb 2024 in cs.HC and cs.RO | (2402.15431v1)

Abstract: We reflect on the design of a multispecies world centred around a bespoke enclosure in which three cats and a robot arm coexist for six hours a day during a twelve-day installation as part of an artist-led project. In this paper, we present the project's design process, encompassing various interconnected components, including the cats, the robot and its autonomous systems, the custom end-effectors and robot attachments, the diverse roles of the humans-in-the-loop, and the custom-designed enclosure. Subsequently, we provide a detailed account of key moments during the deployment and discuss the design implications for future multispecies systems. Specifically, we argue that designing the technology and its interactions is not sufficient, but that it is equally important to consider the design of the `world' in which the technology operates. Finally, we highlight the necessity of human involvement in areas such as breakdown recovery, animal welfare, and their role as audience.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (57)
  1. Mixed-initiative interaction. IEEE Intelligent Systems and their Applications 14, 5 (1999), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/5254.796083
  2. Disruptive Improvisations: Making Use of Non-Deterministic Art Practices in HCI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI EA ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3170630
  3. The Greeting Machine: An Abstract Robotic Object for Opening Encounters. In 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). 595–602. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2018.8525516
  4. Oliver Bendel. 2017. LADYBIRD: The animal-friendly robot vacuum cleaner. In 2017 AAAI Spring Symposium Series.
  5. Performance-Led Research in the Wild. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 20, 3, Article 14 (jul 2013), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2491500.2491502
  6. Uncomfortable Interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2005–2014. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208347
  7. Crafting Interactive Decoration. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 24, 4, Article 26 (aug 2017), 39 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3058552
  8. Charting Ethical Tensions in Multispecies Technology Research through Beneficiary-Epistemology Space. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.
  9. Infrastructures for Virtual Volunteering at Online Music Festivals. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 7, CSCW1 (2023), 1–26.
  10. Prajna Bhat and Yuhang Zhao. 2022. ”I Was Confused by It; It Was Confused by Me:” Exploring the Experiences of People with Visual Impairments around Mobile Service Robots. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, CSCW2, Article 481 (nov 2022), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555582
  11. ’A Farmer, a Place and at Least 20 Members’: The Development of Artifact Ecologies in Volunteer-Based Communities. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (San Francisco, California, USA) (CSCW ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1142–1156. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820029
  12. John WS Bradshaw. 2012. The behaviour of the domestic cat. Cabi.
  13. Stewart Brand. 1995. How buildings learn: What happens after they’re built. Penguin.
  14. Catit. 2023. Catit Senses Super Circuit. https://catit.co.uk/products/catit-senses-super-circuit
  15. Nourishing the Ground for Sustainable HCI: Considerations from Ecologically Engaged Art. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518763
  16. Pups Dream. 2023. FunBox® interactive Cat Toy. https://pupsdream.com/products/funbox
  17. Ernest A Edmonds. 2014. Human computer interaction, art and experience. In Interactive experience in the digital age: evaluating new art practice. Springer, 11–23.
  18. Jacklyn J. Ellis. 2022. Beyond ”Doing Better”: Ordinal Rating Scales to Monitor Behavioural Indicators of Well-Being in Cats. Animals 12, 21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12212897
  19. What are you or who are you? The emergence of social interaction between dog and an unidentified moving object (UMO). PloS one 8, 8 (2013), e72727.
  20. Christopher Getschmann and Florian Echtler. 2021. Seedmarkers: Embeddable Markers for Physical Objects. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Salzburg, Austria) (TEI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 26, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3430524.3440645
  21. Celia Haddon and Daniel Mills. 2023. Being Your Cat: What’s Really Going on in Your Feline’s Mind. Animal Welfare 32 (2023), e37. https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2023.31
  22. Stacey Higginbotham. 2019. Remaking the world for robots [Opinion]. IEEE Spectrum 56, 8 (2019), 20–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.2019.8784117
  23. From Entry to Access: How Shareability Comes About. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (Helsinki, Finland) (DPPI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1145/1314161.1314191
  24. Diligent Robotics Inc. 2023. Care is a team effort. https://www.diligentrobots.com/moxi
  25. Future Market Insights. 2023. Cat Toys Market Outlook (2023 to 2033). https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/cat-toys-market
  26. Fribo: A Social Networking Robot for Increasing Social Connectedness through Sharing Daily Home Activities from Living Noise Data. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Chicago, IL, USA) (HRI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171254
  27. A Social Robot in a Human-Animal Relationship at Home: A Field Study. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction (Bielefeld, Germany) (HAI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1145/3125739.3125759
  28. M R Kessler and D C Turner. 1997. Stress and Adaptation of Cats (Felis Silvestris Catus) Housed Singly, in Pairs and in Groups in Boarding Catteries. Animal Welfare 6, 3 (1997), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962728600019837
  29. Animal-Robot Interaction for pet caring. In 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation - (CIRA). 159–164. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIRA.2009.5423214
  30. Problematising Upstream Technology through Speculative Design: The Case of Quantified Cats and Dogs. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2663–2672. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702260
  31. What’s in an Ecology? A Review of Artifact, Communicative, Device and Information Ecologies. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society (Tallinn, Estonia) (NordiCHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 88, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420185
  32. Clara Mancini. 2011. Animal-Computer Interaction: A Manifesto. Interactions 18, 4 (jul 2011), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978822.1978836
  33. Clara Mancini. 2013. Animal-Computer Interaction (ACI): Changing Perspective on HCI, Participation and Sustainability. In CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI EA ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2227–2236. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468744
  34. Clara Mancini. 2017. Towards an animal-centred ethics for Animal–Computer Interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 98 (2017), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.04.008
  35. Paul E Miller and F Lights. 2001. Vision in animals-What do dogs and cats see. In The 25th Annual Waltham/OSU Symposium. Small Animal Ophthalmology. 27–28.
  36. Frank Noz and Jinsoo An. 2011. Cat Cat Revolution: An Interspecies Gaming Experience. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2661–2664. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979331
  37. Petlibro. 2023. Pixie Mouse Interactive Toy. https://uk.petlibro.com/products/pixie-mouse-interactive-cat-toy
  38. Developing a Depth-Based Tracking System for Interactive Playful Environments with Animals. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (Iskandar, Malaysia) (ACE ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 59, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2832932.2837007
  39. Towards Future Interactive Intelligent Systems for Animals: Study and Recognition of Embodied Interactions. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Limassol, Cyprus) (IUI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025171.3025175
  40. Luis C. Populin and Tom C. T. Yin. 1998. Behavioral Studies of Sound Localization in the Cat. Journal of Neuroscience 18, 6 (1998), 2147–2160. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-06-02147.1998 arXiv:https://www.jneurosci.org/content/18/6/2147.full.pdf
  41. What is a digital ecology? Theoretical foundations and a unified definition. Australian Journal of Intelligent Information Processing Systems 13, 4 (2014), 5.
  42. Wildlife conservation at a garden level: The effect of robotic lawn mowers on European hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus). Animals 11, 5 (2021), 1191.
  43. Tom Rodden and Steve Benford. 2003. The evolution of buildings and implications for the design of ubiquitous domestic environments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 9–16.
  44. The Purr-suit of Happiness: A Tale of Three Kittens: Robots, Humans, Cats, and AI. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boulder, CO, USA) (HRI ’24 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610978.364079
  45. Cat Royale. Interactions 31, 1 (jan 2024), 64. https://doi.org/10.1145/3636499
  46. TAS for Cats: An Artist-Led Exploration of Trustworthy Autonomous Systems for Companion Animals. In Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems (Edinburgh, United Kingdom) (TAS ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 36, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3597512.3597517
  47. Non-Dyadic Interaction: A Literature Review of 15 Years of Human-Robot Interaction Conference Publications. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. 11, 2, Article 13 (feb 2022), 32 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3488242
  48. Domestic Robots and the Dream of Automation: Understanding Human Interaction and Intervention. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 241, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445629
  49. Phoebe Sengers and Bill Gaver. 2006. Staying Open to Interpretation: Engaging Multiple Meanings in Design and Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (University Park, PA, USA) (DIS ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1145/1142405.1142422
  50. Happy-Poppy Pet Shop. 2023. Purr-fect Playmate. https://happy-poppy.uk/products/purr-fect-playmate
  51. Bernd Carsten Stahl. 2022. From computer ethics and the ethics of AI towards an ethics of digital ecosystems. AI and Ethics 2, 1 (2022), 65–77.
  52. Blast Theory. 2022. Cat Royale. https://www.blasttheory.co.uk/projects/cat-royale/
  53. Investigating Human-Robot Cooperation in a Hospital Environment: Scrutinising Visions and Actual Realisation of Mobile Robots in Service Work. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021 (Virtual Event, USA) (DIS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462101
  54. Humans and robots coping with crisis – Starship, Covid-19 and urban robotics in an unpredictable world. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). 2596–2601. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC52423.2021.9658581
  55. Guri B. Verne. 2020. Adapting to a Robot: Adapting Gardening and the Garden to Fit a Robot Lawn Mower. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (HRI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3380738
  56. Ron Wakkary. 2021. Things we could design: For more than human-centered worlds. MIT press.
  57. Michelle Westerlaken and Stefano Gualeni. 2014. Grounded Zoomorphism: An Evaluation Methodology for ACI Design. In Proceedings of the 2014 Workshops on Advances in Computer Entertainment Conference (Funchal, Portugal) (ACE ’14 Workshops). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 5, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2693787.2693796
Citations (5)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that adaptive robotic systems can facilitate over 500 engaging multispecies interactions in a controlled artistic installation.
  • Researchers detail a holistic design methodology that integrates animal welfare, spatial dynamics, and human oversight in multispecies environments.
  • The study highlights challenges with full automation due to unpredictable animal behavior, underscoring the necessity for human-in-the-loop interventions.

Designing Multispecies Worlds for Robots, Cats, and Humans

The paper "Designing Multispecies Worlds for Robots, Cats, and Humans" by Schneiders et al. details an innovative exploration into the design of environments where multiple species coexist with a robotic autonomous system. The project, titled Cat Royale, is an artist-led initiative that lays out an experimental foray into creating an engaging and enriching environment for cats facilitated by robotic interaction. This initiative serves as a testament to the emerging field of multispecies interaction in human-computer interaction (HCI) and presents a critical analytical reflection on both the practical and theoretical implications of such immersive multispecies systems.

Conceptual Framework and Design Methodology

Cat Royale is positioned as an experimental setting, where three cats interact with a robot designed to enrich their environment through play. The design process reflects a keen awareness of managing multiple components: it includes the selection of the cats, the development of an autonomous robotic system, the design of cat-toy interactions, and the crafting of an enclosure accommodating both the technological apparatus and the animal participants. This intricately balanced ecosystem reflects a convergence of technology, space design, and animal welfare—all orchestrated over a 12-day artistic installation.

Key Findings and Observations

The study elucidates various success factors and challenges. A primary outcome is the illustration of successful multispecies engagement facilitated by robotic technology—over 500 interactions were recorded, showcasing diverse play activities targeted at enhancing each cat's individual preferences. A notable aspect of this system is the decision engine, which personalizes interactions based on the animals' responses, thus demonstrating the potential of adaptive systems in multispecies contexts.

While the research reveals potential, it also highlights the limitations and complications inherent in such installations. For instance, human oversight was crucial for handling system errors and ensuring safety, emphasizing a reliance on human-in-the-loop processes despite the autonomous design aspirations. Instances of manual intervention reveal challenges in managing unpredictable animal behaviors and adapting robot functionalities in real-time—a reminder of the complexity in engineering seamless multispecies interactions.

Implications for Future Development

The implications of this research are significant for the progression of Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), especially with regard to integrating non-human species into technological ecosystems. The authors propose that effective multispecies systems require a holistic approach that encompasses not just the technological capabilities of robots but also the environmental and welfare considerations of the animal participants. This extends to considering how interiors are designed to safely and comfortably accommodate interactions between animals and robots.

Additionally, the research calls for a nuanced exploration of how humans are embedded within such ecosystems. In Cat Royale, humans were not only facilitators of robotic operation but were essential to interpreting and managing the interactions between cats and technology. This highlights a critical need for future systems to consider human roles in both operational and ethical contexts.

Future Directions

The presented research raises pertinent questions about the scalability and transferability of these findings to more practical, everyday scenarios. In particular, further exploration could refine how adaptive technologies can reliably predict and enhance animal engagement over longer terms, beyond the confines of an artistic installation. Moreover, it positions a pathway for developing mixed-initiative systems where combined human-robot collaboration might better serve the well-being and agency of animal users.

In conclusion, Schneiders et al. provide a substantial contribution to the discourse on multispecies worlds, illustrating that the design of environments shared by robots, humans, and other species must be delicately balanced to genuinely enrich all involved. Moving forward, the refinement and application of such systems can steer towards enhancing multispecies cooperation, fostering greater synergy between technological advancements and ecological empathy.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 5 tweets with 38 likes about this paper.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up for Free