Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Few-Shot Scenario Testing for Autonomous Vehicles Based on Neighborhood Coverage and Similarity

Published 2 Feb 2024 in eess.SY, cs.LG, cs.SY, cs.RO, and cs.SE | (2402.01795v2)

Abstract: Testing and evaluating the safety performance of autonomous vehicles (AVs) is essential before the large-scale deployment. Practically, the number of testing scenarios permissible for a specific AV is severely limited by tight constraints on testing budgets and time. With the restrictions imposed by strictly restricted numbers of tests, existing testing methods often lead to significant uncertainty or difficulty to quantifying evaluation results. In this paper, we formulate this problem for the first time the "few-shot testing" (FST) problem and propose a systematic framework to address this challenge. To alleviate the considerable uncertainty inherent in a small testing scenario set, we frame the FST problem as an optimization problem and search for the testing scenario set based on neighborhood coverage and similarity. Specifically, under the guidance of better generalization ability of the testing scenario set on AVs, we dynamically adjust this set and the contribution of each testing scenario to the evaluation result based on coverage, leveraging the prior information of surrogate models (SMs). With certain hypotheses on SMs, a theoretical upper bound of evaluation error is established to verify the sufficiency of evaluation accuracy within the given limited number of tests. The experiment results on cut-in scenarios demonstrate a notable reduction in evaluation error and variance of our method compared to conventional testing methods, especially for situations with a strict limit on the number of scenarios.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (24)
  1. S. Riedmaier, T. Ponn, D. Ludwig, B. Schick, and F. Diermeyer, “Survey on scenario-based safety assessment of automated vehicles,” IEEE access, vol. 8, pp. 87 456–87 477, 2020.
  2. H. X. Liu and S. Feng, “‘curse of rarity’ for autonomous vehicles,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.02749, 2022.
  3. N. Webb, D. Smith, C. Ludwick, T. Victor, Q. Hommes, F. Favaro, G. Ivanov, and T. Daniel, “Waymo’s safety methodologies and safety readiness determinations,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.00054, 2020.
  4. X. Zhang, J. Tao, K. Tan, M. Törngren, J. M. G. Sanchez, M. R. Ramli, X. Tao, M. Gyllenhammar, F. Wotawa, N. Mohan et al., “Finding critical scenarios for automated driving systems: A systematic mapping study,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 991–1026, 2022.
  5. G. Bagschik, T. Menzel, and M. Maurer, “Ontology based scene creation for the development of automated vehicles,” in 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).   IEEE, 2018, pp. 1813–1820.
  6. F. Kruber, J. Wurst, and M. Botsch, “An unsupervised random forest clustering technique for automatic traffic scenario categorization,” in 2018 21st International conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC).   IEEE, 2018, pp. 2811–2818.
  7. F. Kruber, J. Wurst, E. S. Morales, S. Chakraborty, and M. Botsch, “Unsupervised and supervised learning with the random forest algorithm for traffic scenario clustering and classification,” in 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).   IEEE, 2019, pp. 2463–2470.
  8. P. Weissensteiner, G. Stettinger, S. Khastgir, and D. Watzenig, “Operational design domain-driven coverage for the safety argumentation of automated vehicles,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 12 263–12 284, 2023.
  9. J. Duan, F. Gao, and Y. He, “Test scenario generation and optimization technology for intelligent driving systems,” IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 115–127, 2020.
  10. M. Klischat and M. Althoff, “Generating critical test scenarios for automated vehicles with evolutionary algorithms,” in 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).   IEEE, 2019, pp. 2352–2358.
  11. A. Li, S. Chen, L. Sun, N. Zheng, M. Tomizuka, and W. Zhan, “Scegene: Bio-inspired traffic scenario generation for autonomous driving testing,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 14 859–14 874, 2021.
  12. L. Li, W.-L. Huang, Y. Liu, N.-N. Zheng, and F.-Y. Wang, “Intelligence testing for autonomous vehicles: A new approach,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 158–166, 2016.
  13. J. Ge, J. Zhang, C. Chang, Y. Zhang, D. Yao, and L. Li, “Task-driven controllable scenario generation framework based on aog,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2024.
  14. S. Zhang, H. Peng, D. Zhao, and H. E. Tseng, “Accelerated evaluation of autonomous vehicles in the lane change scenario based on subset simulation technique,” in 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).   IEEE, 2018, pp. 3935–3940.
  15. S. Feng, Y. Feng, C. Yu, Y. Zhang, and H. X. Liu, “Testing scenario library generation for connected and automated vehicles, part i: Methodology,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1573–1582, 2020.
  16. S. Feng, X. Yan, H. Sun, Y. Feng, and H. X. Liu, “Intelligent driving intelligence test for autonomous vehicles with naturalistic and adversarial environment,” Nature communications, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 748, 2021.
  17. D. Zhao, H. Lam, H. Peng, S. Bao, D. J. LeBlanc, K. Nobukawa, and C. S. Pan, “Accelerated evaluation of automated vehicles safety in lane-change scenarios based on importance sampling techniques,” IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 595–607, 2016.
  18. D. Zhao, X. Huang, H. Peng, H. Lam, and D. J. LeBlanc, “Accelerated evaluation of automated vehicles in car-following maneuvers,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 733–744, 2017.
  19. C. Finn, P. Abbeel, and S. Levine, “Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks,” in International conference on machine learning.   PMLR, 2017, pp. 1126–1135.
  20. G. Koch, R. Zemel, R. Salakhutdinov et al., “Siamese neural networks for one-shot image recognition,” in ICML deep learning workshop, vol. 2, no. 1.   Lille, 2015.
  21. C. Amersbach and H. Winner, “Defining required and feasible test coverage for scenario-based validation of highly automated vehicles,” in 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC).   IEEE, 2019, pp. 425–430.
  22. Z. Tahir and R. Alexander, “Coverage based testing for v&v and safety assurance of self-driving autonomous vehicles: A systematic literature review,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference On Artificial Intelligence Testing (AITest).   IEEE, 2020, pp. 23–30.
  23. T. Zhao, E. Yurtsever, J. Paulson, and G. Rizzoni, “Automated vehicle safety guarantee, verification and certification: A survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.02818, 2022.
  24. S. Feng, Y. Feng, H. Sun, S. Bao, Y. Zhang, and H. X. Liu, “Testing scenario library generation for connected and automated vehicles, part ii: Case studies,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 5635–5647, 2020.
Citations (3)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.