Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Motility and pair-wise interactions of chemically active droplets in 1-D confinement

Published 20 Jan 2024 in cond-mat.soft | (2401.11154v1)

Abstract: Self-propelled droplets serve as ideal model systems to delve deeper into understanding of the motion of biological micro-swimmers by simulating their motility. Biological microorganisms are renowned for showcasing a diverse array of dynamic swimming behaviors when confronted with physical constraints. This study aims to elucidate the impact of physical constraints on swimming characteristics of biological microorganisms. To achieve this, we present observations on the individual and pair-wise behavior of micellar solubilized self-propelled 4-Cyano-4'-pentyl-biphenyl (5CB) oil droplets in a square capillary channel filled with a surfactant trimethyl ammonium bromide (TTAB) aqueous solution. To explore the effect of the underlying P\'eclet ($Pe$) number of the swimming droplets, the study is also performed in the presence of additives such as high molecular weight polymer Polyethylene oxide (PEO) and molecular solute glycerol. The capillary confinement restricts droplet to predominantly one-dimensional (1D) motion, albeit with noticeable differences in their motion across the three scenarios. Through a characterization of the chemical and hydrodynamic flow fields surrounding the droplets, we illustrate that the modification of the droplets' chemical field due to confinement varies significantly based on the underlying differences in the P\'eclet number ($Pe$) in these cases. This alteration in the chemical field distribution notably affects the individual droplets' motion. Moreover, these distinct chemical field interactions between the droplets also lead to variations in their pair-wise motion, ranging from behaviors like chasing to scattering.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (19)
  1. E. M. Purcell, American journal of physics 45, 3 (1977).
  2. A. Zöttl and J. M. Yeomans, Nature Physics 15, 554 (2019).
  3. W. Gao and J. Wang, Acs Nano 8, 3170 (2014).
  4. B. Jurado-Sánchez and A. Escarpa, Electroanalysis 29, 14 (2017).
  5. A. Würger, Physical review letters 115, 188304 (2015).
  6. H.-R. Jiang, N. Yoshinaga, and M. Sano, Physical review letters 105, 268302 (2010).
  7. D. J. P. Kumar, C. Borkar, and P. Dayal, Langmuir 37, 12586 (2021).
  8. M. Morozov and S. Michelin, The Journal of chemical physics 150 (2019).
  9. C. Jin, C. Krüger, and C. C. Maass, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, 5089 (2017).
  10. B. Liu, K. S. Breuer, and T. R. Powers, Physics of Fluids 26 (2014).
  11. A. Acemoglu and S. Yesilyurt, Biophysical journal 106, 1537 (2014).
  12. Y. Ibrahim and T. B. Liverpool, The European Physical Journal Special Topics 225, 1843 (2016).
  13. N. Desai and S. Michelin, Bulletin of the American Physical Society  (2022).
  14. N. Desai and S. Michelin, Physical Review Fluids 6, 114103 (2021).
  15. K. Son, D. R. Brumley, and R. Stocker, Nature Reviews Microbiology 13, 761 (2015).
  16. W. Thielicke and R. Sonntag, Journal of Open Research Software 9 (2021).
  17. P. Dwivedi, D. Pillai, and R. Mangal, Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science , 101614 (2022).
  18. G.-J. Li and A. M. Ardekani, Physical Review E 90, 013010 (2014).
  19. K. Lippera, M. Benzaquen, and S. Michelin, Physical Review Fluids 5, 032201 (2020b).
Citations (1)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 7 likes about this paper.