Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 183 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 97 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 221 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 440 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Constraints on cosmological coupling from the accretion history of supermassive black holes (2312.12344v1)

Published 19 Dec 2023 in astro-ph.CO

Abstract: Coupling of black hole mass to the cosmic expansion has been suggested as a possible path to understanding the dark energy content of the Universe. We test this hypothesis by comparing the supermassive black hole (SMBH) mass density at $z=0$ to the total mass accreted in AGN since $z=6$, to constrain how much of the SMBH mass density can arise from cosmologically-coupled growth, as opposed to growth by accretion. Using an estimate of the local SMBH mass density of $\approx 1.0\times10{6}\,$M$_{\odot}\,$Mpc${-1}$, a radiative accretion efficiency, $\eta$: $0.05<\eta<0.3$, and the observed AGN luminosity density at $z\approx 4$, we constrain the value of the coupling constant between the scale size of the Universe and the black hole mass, $k$, to lie in the range $0<k\stackrel{<}{_{\sim}}2$, below the value of $k=3$ needed for black holes to be the source term for dark energy. Initial estimates of the gravitational wave background using pulsar timing arrays, however, favor a higher SMBH mass density at $z=0$. We show that if we adopt such a mass density at $z=0$ of $\approx 7.4\times 10^{6}\,$M$_{\odot}\,$Mpc$^{-1}$, this makes $k=3$ viable even for low radiative efficiencies, and may exclude non-zero cosmological coupling. We conclude that, although current estimates of the SMBH mass density based on the black hole mass -- bulge mass relation probably exclude $k=3$, the possibility remains open that, if the GWB is due to SMBH mergers, $k\>2$ is preferred.

Citations (7)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 3 tweets and received 71 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: