Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Complex Time Evolution in Tensor Networks

Published 18 Dec 2023 in cond-mat.str-el, cond-mat.mtrl-sci, and quant-ph | (2312.11705v1)

Abstract: Real-time calculations in tensor networks are strongly limited in time by entanglement growth, restricting the achievable frequency resolution of Green's functions, spectral functions, self-energies, and other related quantities. By extending the time evolution to contours in the complex plane, entanglement growth is curtailed, enabling numerically efficient high-precision calculations of time-dependent correlators and Green's functions with detailed frequency resolution. Various approaches to time evolution in the complex plane and the required post-processing for extracting the pure real-time and frequency information are compared. We benchmark our results on the examples of the single-impurity Anderson model using matrix-product states and of the three-band Hubbard-Kanamori and Dworin-Narath models using a tree tensor network. Our findings indicate that the proposed methods are also applicable to challenging realistic calculations of materials.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (47)
  1. S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
  2. S. R. White, Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. B 48, 10345 (1993).
  3. U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics 326, 96 (2011), january 2011 Special Issue.
  4. K. A. Hallberg, Density matrix algorithm for the calculation of dynamical properties of low dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. B 52, 9827 (1995).
  5. T. D. Kühner and S. R. White, Dynamical correlation functions using the density-matrix renormalization group, Phys. Rev. B 60, 335 (1999).
  6. E. Jeckelmann, Dynamical density-matrix renormalization-group method, Phys. Rev. B 66, 045114 (2002).
  7. A. Nocera and G. Alvarez, Spectral functions with the density matrix renormalization group: Krylov-space approach for correction vectors, Phys. Rev. E 94, 053308 (2016).
  8. A. Baiardi, A. K. Kelemen, and M. Reiher, Excited-state DMRG made simple with FEAST, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 18, 415 (2022), pMID: 34914392, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00984 .
  9. G. Vidal, Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 147902 (2003).
  10. G. Vidal, Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 040502 (2004).
  11. S. R. White and A. E. Feiguin, Real time evolution using the density matrix renormalization group, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 076401 (2004).
  12. F. Verstraete, J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, and J. I. Cirac, Matrix product density operators: simulation of finite-T𝑇Titalic_T and dissipative systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 207204 (2004).
  13. M. Zwolak and G. Vidal, Mixed-state dynamics in one-dimensional quantum lattice systems: A time-dependent superoperator renormalization algorithm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 207205 (2004).
  14. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2004, P06002 (2004).
  15. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Evolution of entanglement entropy in one-dimensional systems, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2005, P04010 (2005).
  16. J. Eisert and T. J. Osborne, General entanglement scaling laws from time evolution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 150404 (2006).
  17. S. Bravyi, Upper bounds on entangling rates of bipartite hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. A 76, 052319 (2007).
  18. T. J. Osborne, Efficient approximation of the dynamics of one-dimensional quantum spin systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 157202 (2006).
  19. A. M. Alhambra and J. I. Cirac, Locally accurate tensor networks for thermal states and time evolution, PRX Quantum 2, 040331 (2021).
  20. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement and correlation functions following a local quench: a conformal field theory approach, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2007, P10004 (2007).
  21. A. Georges and G. Kotliar, Hubbard model in infinite dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 45, 6479 (1992).
  22. K. G. Wilson, The renormalization group: Critical phenomena and the Kondo problem, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 773 (1975).
  23. H. R. Krishna-murthy, J. W. Wilkins, and K. G. Wilson, Renormalization-group approach to the Anderson model of dilute magnetic alloys. I. Static properties for the symmetric case, Phys. Rev. B 21, 1003 (1980).
  24. R. Bulla, T. A. Costi, and T. Pruschke, Numerical renormalization group method for quantum impurity systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 395 (2008).
  25. P. W. Anderson, Localized magnetic states in metals, Phys. Rev. 124, 41 (1961).
  26. C. Raas and G. S. Uhrig, Spectral densities from dynamic density-matrix renormalization, The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 45, 293 (2005).
  27. J. R. Schrieffer and P. A. Wolff, Relation between the Anderson and Kondo Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. 149, 491 (1966).
  28. I. de Vega, U. Schollwöck, and F. A. Wolf, How to discretize a quantum bath for real-time evolution, Phys. Rev. B 92, 155126 (2015).
  29. C. Karrasch, J. H. Bardarson, and J. E. Moore, Reducing the numerical effort of finite-temperature density matrix renormalization group calculations, New Journal of Physics 15, 083031 (2013).
  30. T. Barthel, Precise evaluation of thermal response functions by optimized density matrix renormalization group schemes, New Journal of Physics 15, 073010 (2013).
  31. A. Weichselbaum and J. von Delft, Sum-rule conserving spectral functions from the numerical renormalization group, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 076402 (2007).
  32. R. Peters, T. Pruschke, and F. B. Anders, Numerical renormalization group approach to green’s functions for quantum impurity models, Phys. Rev. B 74, 245114 (2006).
  33. R. Žitko and T. Pruschke, Energy resolution and discretization artifacts in the numerical renormalization group, Phys. Rev. B 79, 085106 (2009).
  34. A. Weichselbaum, Tensor networks and the numerical renormalization group, Phys. Rev. B 86, 245124 (2012a).
  35. S.-S. B. Lee, J. von Delft, and A. Weichselbaum, Doublon-holon origin of the subpeaks at the hubbard band edges, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 236402 (2017).
  36. S.-S. B. Lee and A. Weichselbaum, Adaptive broadening to improve spectral resolution in the numerical renormalization group, Phys. Rev. B 94, 235127 (2016).
  37. A. Weichselbaum, Non-abelian symmetries in tensor networks: A quantum symmetry space approach, Annals of Physics 327, 2972 (2012b).
  38. F. B. Kugler, Improved estimator for numerical renormalization group calculations of the self-energy, Phys. Rev. B 105, 245132 (2022).
  39. A. Georges, L. de Medici, and J. Mravlje, Strong correlations from Hund’s coupling, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 4, 137 (2013).
  40. D. Bauernfeind and M. Aichhorn, Time dependent variational principle for tree Tensor Networks, SciPost Phys. 8, 024 (2020).
  41. A. Horvat, R. Žitko, and J. Mravlje, Low-energy physics of three-orbital impurity model with kanamori interaction, Phys. Rev. B 94, 165140 (2016).
  42. A. Horvat, R. Žitko, and J. Mravlje, Spin-orbit coupling in three-orbital kanamori impurity model and its relevance for transition-metal oxides, Phys. Rev. B 96, 085122 (2017).
  43. F. B. Kugler and G. Kotliar, Is the orbital-selective mott phase stable against interorbital hopping?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 096403 (2022).
  44. M. Jarrell and J. E. Gubernatis, Bayesian inference and the analytic continuation of imaginary-time quantum Monte Carlo data, Physics Reports 269, 133 (1996).
  45. V. Zlatić and B. Horvatić, Series expansion for the symmetric anderson hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. B 28, 6904 (1983).
  46. K. Yamada, Perturbation Expansion for the Anderson Hamiltonian. II, Prog. Theor. Phys. 53, 970 (1975).
  47. Y. Nishikawa, D. J. G. Crow, and A. C. Hewson, Renormalized parameters and perturbation theory for an n𝑛nitalic_n-channel anderson model with hund’s rule coupling: Symmetric case, Phys. Rev. B 82, 115123 (2010).
Citations (7)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free