Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Fidelity and Overlap of Neural Quantum States: Error Bounds on the Monte Carlo Estimator

Published 24 Nov 2023 in quant-ph and cond-mat.dis-nn | (2311.14820v1)

Abstract: Overlap between two neural quantum states can be computed through Monte Carlo sampling by evaluating the unnormalized probability amplitudes on a subset of basis configurations. Due to the presence of probability amplitude ratios in the estimator, which are possibly unbounded, convergence of this quantity is not immediately obvious. Our work provides a derivation of analytical error bounds on the overlap in the Monte Carlo calculations as a function of their fidelity and the number of samples. Special case of normalized autoregressive neural quantum states is analyzed separately.

Authors (1)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (24)
  1. A. W. Sandvik, A. Avella, and F. Mancini, Computational studies of quantum spin systems, in AIP Conference Proceedings (AIP, 2010).
  2. D. Ceperley and B. Alder, Quantum monte carlo, Science 231, 555 (1986).
  3. M. Troyer and U.-J. Wiese, Computational complexity and fundamental limitations to fermionic quantum monte carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 170201 (2005).
  4. S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
  5. U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics 326, 96 (2011), january 2011 Special Issue.
  6. R. Orús, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Annals of Physics 349, 117 (2014).
  7. G. Carleo and M. Troyer, Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks, Science 355, 602 (2017).
  8. O. Sharir, A. Shashua, and G. Carleo, Neural tensor contractions and the expressive power of deep neural quantum states, Physical Review B 106, 10.1103/physrevb.106.205136 (2022).
  9. S.-H. Lin and F. Pollmann, Scaling of neural-network quantum states for time evolution, physica status solidi (b) 259, 2100172 (2022).
  10. Z. Denis, A. Sinibaldi, and G. Carleo, Comment on ”can neural quantum states learn volume-law ground states?” (2023), arXiv:2309.11534 [quant-ph] .
  11. M. Schmitt and M. Heyl, Quantum many-body dynamics in two dimensions with artificial neural networks, Physical Review Letters 125, 10.1103/physrevlett.125.100503 (2020).
  12. N. Yoshioka and R. Hamazaki, Constructing neural stationary states for open quantum many-body systems, Physical Review B 99, 10.1103/physrevb.99.214306 (2019).
  13. M. J. Hartmann and G. Carleo, Neural-network approach to dissipative quantum many-body dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 250502 (2019).
  14. M. Reh, M. Schmitt, and M. Gärttner, Time-dependent variational principle for open quantum systems with artificial neural networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 230501 (2021).
  15. H.-Q. Zhou, R. Orús, and G. Vidal, Ground state fidelity from tensor network representations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 080601 (2008).
  16. B. Damski, Fidelity approach to quantum phase transitions in quantum ising model, in Quantum Criticality in Condensed Matter (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2015).
  17. S. T. Flammia and Y.-K. Liu, Direct fidelity estimation from few Pauli measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 230501 (2011).
  18. V. Havlicek, Amplitude ratios and neural network quantum states, Quantum 7, 938 (2023).
  19. D. Wu, L. Wang, and P. Zhang, Solving statistical mechanics using variational autoregressive networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 080602 (2019).
  20. I. L. Gutiérrez and C. B. Mendl, Real time evolution with neural-network quantum states, Quantum 6, 627 (2022).
  21. M. Schmitt and M. Reh, jVMC: Versatile and performant variational Monte Carlo leveraging automated differentiation and GPU acceleration, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 2 (2022a).
  22. M. Schmitt and M. Reh, Codebase release 0.1 for jVMC, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 2 (2022b).
  23. D.-A. Clevert, T. Unterthiner, and S. Hochreiter, Fast and accurate deep network learning by exponential linear units (elus) (2016), arXiv:1511.07289 [cs.LG] .
  24. A. W. Sandvik and G. Vidal, Variational quantum monte carlo simulations with tensor-network states, Physical Review Letters 99, 10.1103/physrevlett.99.220602 (2007).
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.