Data-Driven Newton Raphson Controller Based on Koopman Operator Theory
Abstract: Newton-Raphson controller is a powerful prediction-based variable gain integral controller. Basically, the classical model-based Newton-Raphson controller requires two elements: the prediction of the system output and the derivative of the predicted output with respect to the control input. In real applications, the model may not be known and it is infeasible to predict the system sometime ahead and calculate the derivative by finite difference method as done in simulation. To solve these problems, in this work, we utilize the Koopman operator framework to reconstruct a linear model of the original nonlinear dynamical system and then utilize the output of the new linear system as the predictor of the Newton-Raphson controller. This method is only based on collected data within some time instant thus more practical. Three examples related to highly nonlinear systems are provided to verify the effectiveness of our proposed method.
- Y. Wardi, C. Seatzu, and M. Egerstedt, “Tracking control via variable-gain integrator and lookahead simulation: Application to leader-follower multiagent networks,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 51, no. 16, pp. 217–222, 2018, 6th IFAC Conference on Analysis and Design of Hybrid Systems ADHS 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405896318311534
- T. Faulwasser, B. Kern, and R. Findeisen, “Model predictive path-following for constrained nonlinear systems,” 12 2009, pp. 8642–8647.
- H. Lee, “Trajectory tracking control of multirotors from modelling to experiments: A survey,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 15, 12 2016.
- Z. Bingul and K. Gul, “Intelligent-pid with pd feedforward trajectory tracking control of an autonomous underwater vehicle,” Machines, vol. 11, no. 2, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1702/11/2/300
- A. Isidori and C. Byrnes, “Output regulation of nonlinear systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 131–140, 1990.
- J. Bettega and D. Richiedei, “Trajectory tracking in an underactuated, non-minimum phase two-link multibody system through model predictive control with embedded reference dynamics,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 180, p. 105165, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094114X22004104
- Y. Wardi, C. Seatzu, M. Egerstedt, and I. Buckley, “Performance regulation and tracking via lookahead simulation: Preliminary results and validation,” in 2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 2017, pp. 6462–6468.
- Y. Wardi, C. Seatzu, J. Cortés, M. Egerstedt, S. Shivam, and I. Buckley, “Tracking control by the newton-raphson method with output prediction and controller speedup,” arXiv: Optimization and Control, 2019.
- Y. Wardi, C. Seatzu, and S. Shivam, “Application of an output tracking technique to formation control,” in 2021 29th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED), 2021, pp. 898–903.
- S. Shivam, A. Kanellopoulos, K. G. Vamvoudakis, and Y. Wardi, “A predictive deep learning approach to output regulation: The case of collaborative pursuit evasion,” in 2019 IEEE 58th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 2019, pp. 853–859.
- K. Niu, Y. Wardi, C. T. Abdallah, and M. Hayajneh, “A model-free tracking controller based on the newton-raphson method and feedforward neural networks,” in 2022 American Control Conference (ACC), 2022, pp. 3254–3259.
- S. L. Brunton, “Notes on koopman operator theory,” 2019.
- D. Bruder, X. Fu, B. Gillespie, C. Remy, and R. Vasudevan, “Koopman-based control of a soft continuum manipulator under variable loading conditions,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. PP, pp. 1–1, 07 2021.
- A. Krolicki, D. Tellez-Castro, and U. Vaidya, “Nonlinear dual-mode model predictive control using koopman eigenfunctions,” in 2022 IEEE 61st Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 2022, pp. 3074–3079.
- S. Servadio, R. Armellin, and R. Linares, “A koopman-operator control optimization for relative motion in space,” 2022.
- M. Williams, I. Kevrekidis, and C. Rowley, “A data-driven approximation of the koopman operator: Extending dynamic mode decomposition,” Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 25, 08 2014.
- M. Zhou, N. Sun, H. Chen, and Y. Fang, “A novel sliding mode control method for underactuated overhead cranes,” in 2017 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), 2017, pp. 4548–4552.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper.