Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 89 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 98 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 424 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 164 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Bell inequality is violated in $B^0\to J/ψ\, K^{\star}(892)^0$ decays (2305.04982v2)

Published 8 May 2023 in hep-ph, hep-ex, and quant-ph

Abstract: The violation of the Bell inequality is one of the haLLMarks of quantum mechanics and can be used to rule out local deterministic alternative descriptions. We utilize the data analysis published by the LHCb collaboration on the helicity amplitudes for the decay $B0\to J/\psi \,K*(892)0$ to compute the entanglement among the polarizations of the final vector mesons and the violation of the Bell inequality that it entails. We find that quantum entanglement can be detected with a significance well above 5$\sigma$ (nominally 84$\sigma$) and Bell inequality is violated with a significance well above 5$\sigma$ (nominally 36$\sigma$) -- thereby firmly establishing these distinguishing feature of quantum mechanics at high energies in a collider setting and in the presence of strong and weak interactions. Entanglement is also present and the Bell inequality is violated in other decays of the $B$ mesons into vector mesons, but with lesser significance.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.