Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Understanding Decoupled and Early Weight Decay

Published 27 Dec 2020 in cs.LG and stat.ML | (2012.13841v1)

Abstract: Weight decay (WD) is a traditional regularization technique in deep learning, but despite its ubiquity, its behavior is still an area of active research. Golatkar et al. have recently shown that WD only matters at the start of the training in computer vision, upending traditional wisdom. Loshchilov et al. show that for adaptive optimizers, manually decaying weights can outperform adding an $l_2$ penalty to the loss. This technique has become increasingly popular and is referred to as decoupled WD. The goal of this paper is to investigate these two recent empirical observations. We demonstrate that by applying WD only at the start, the network norm stays small throughout training. This has a regularizing effect as the effective gradient updates become larger. However, traditional generalizations metrics fail to capture this effect of WD, and we show how a simple scale-invariant metric can. We also show how the growth of network weights is heavily influenced by the dataset and its generalization properties. For decoupled WD, we perform experiments in NLP and RL where adaptive optimizers are the norm. We demonstrate that the primary issue that decoupled WD alleviates is the mixing of gradients from the objective function and the $l_2$ penalty in the buffers of Adam (which stores the estimates of the first-order moment). Adaptivity itself is not problematic and decoupled WD ensures that the gradients from the $l_2$ term cannot "drown out" the true objective, facilitating easier hyperparameter tuning.

Citations (23)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that applying weight decay early retains low weight norms, effectively amplifying gradient updates and enhancing generalization.
  • The study introduces a decoupled weight decay approach that isolates regularization from loss gradients, stabilizing hyperparameters in adaptive optimizers like Adam.
  • Experimental results across reinforcement learning and NLP tasks reveal that tailored weight decay strategies can yield computational savings and performance benefits.

Understanding Decoupled and Early Weight Decay

This essay provides an in-depth technical review of "Understanding Decoupled and Early Weight Decay" by Johan Bjorck, Kilian Weinberger, and Carla Gomes. The paper explores recent developments in the use of weight decay (WD) as a regularization technique, particularly focusing on its interaction with deep learning models and adaptive optimizers.

Overview of Weight Decay Techniques

Weight decay (WD) has been a foundational technique for regularization in neural networks, traditionally implemented as an l2l_2 penalty added to the loss function. This paper investigates two significant observations related to WD:

  1. Early Weight Decay: Recent findings suggest that applying WD only in the early training stages may suffice. The paper demonstrates that early WD ensures that the network's norms remain low, retaining a regularizing effect by making gradient updates effectively larger relative to the weights.
  2. Decoupled Weight Decay: In contrast to traditional approaches, decoupled WD manually decays weights separately from the l2l_2 penalty. This separation helps in situations where adaptive optimizers are used, such as Adam, preventing the mixing of gradients from the objective and the regularization term.

Temporal Dynamics of Weight Decay

The paper revisits the traditional usage of WD throughout training, emphasizing the benefits of applying it only during the initial training phase. This leads to enhanced generalization due to the maintenance of low weight norms, which in turn amplifies the effective learning rate. Figure 1

Figure 1: Application of WD remains effective when only used in early training, keeping weight norms low, as shown in experiments with shuffled labels and image datasets.

A pivotal contribution is the introduction of a scale-invariant metric to capture the effects of early WD on the sharpness of network minima. This measure, which is invariant to weight scaling, offers insights into the relationship between sharpness and generalization, filling gaps left by traditional sharpness metrics.

Decoupled Weight Decay in Adaptive Optimizers

The inefficacy of standard WD when used with adaptive optimizers like Adam is attributed to the interaction between gradient scaling and the l2l_2 regularization. The paper illustrates how decoupled WD sidesteps these issues by avoiding the gradient signal mix in Adam's buffers. Figure 2

Figure 2: Learning curves illustrating the improved performance of decoupled WD across various Atari games, contrasting with standard WD.

Experiments in both reinforcement learning (RL) and NLP underline the practical value of decoupled WD. The paper's findings suggest that while decoupled WD may not always offer superior absolute performance compared to finely-tuned l2l_2 regularization, it provides enhanced hyperparameter stability.

Implications and Conclusions

The paper highlights several implications for practitioners. It recommends early WD for datasets with strong generalization characteristics and endorses decoupled WD where adaptive optimization is prevalent. The consideration of dataset-specific norm growth suggests that practitioners tailor WD strategies to dataset generalization properties.

Furthermore, potential computational savings are discussed, with strategies like applying WD intermittently without performance detriment (stuttered WD), showcasing the potential for resource optimization in training large-scale models. Figure 3

Figure 3: Demonstrates savings from applying WD every 128 updates with no performance loss across multiple datasets.

The overall contributions of this paper refine our understanding of WD's role in training dynamics and offer actionable insights for effectively incorporating WD in deep learning pipelines, thereby improving both the generalization and efficiency of trained models.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.